Efficacy, safety and dose patterns of tranexamic acid in meningioma surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lucimário de Carvalho Barros, Clarissa Avancini, Paulo Eduardo Gonçalves, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel, Arthur Maynart Pereira Oliveira
{"title":"Efficacy, safety and dose patterns of tranexamic acid in meningioma surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Lucimário de Carvalho Barros, Clarissa Avancini, Paulo Eduardo Gonçalves, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel, Arthur Maynart Pereira Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03180-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reviewed the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in randomized trials involving patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection surgery, with special emphasis on the effects of different dosages. A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed the full texts and collected data. Efficacy outcomes analyzed included intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. The safety outcomes evaluated included postoperative complications such as seizures, thromboembolic events, and hematoma. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the dosage and timing of administration. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, covering 881 patients. Meta-analysis of the data demonstrated that the use of TXA resulted in a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (Mean Difference [MD] = -270.26 ml, 95% CI [-422.84, -117.67], p < 0.01, I² = 99%), blood transfusion rate (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.46, 0.78], p < 0.01, I² = 3%), duration of surgery (MD = -19.76 min, 95% CI: [-41.74, 2.23], p < 0.01, I² = 75%), and length of hospital stay (MD: -0.48 days, 95% CI: [-0.93, -0.04], p < 0.01, I² = 32%). No significant differences were found in the postoperative complications assessed. In the dosage analysis, the preoperative 20 mg/kg regimen, along with the intraoperative maintenance dose of 1 mg/kg/h, was more effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss in the TXA group, although not statistically significant (323.64 ml vs. 145.54 ml, p = 0.29). The administration of TXA in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection surgery showed beneficial results in all efficacy outcomes evaluated, without increasing postoperative complications. However, further studies, especially multicenter ones, are needed to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03180-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We reviewed the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in randomized trials involving patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection surgery, with special emphasis on the effects of different dosages. A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed the full texts and collected data. Efficacy outcomes analyzed included intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. The safety outcomes evaluated included postoperative complications such as seizures, thromboembolic events, and hematoma. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the dosage and timing of administration. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, covering 881 patients. Meta-analysis of the data demonstrated that the use of TXA resulted in a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (Mean Difference [MD] = -270.26 ml, 95% CI [-422.84, -117.67], p < 0.01, I² = 99%), blood transfusion rate (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.46, 0.78], p < 0.01, I² = 3%), duration of surgery (MD = -19.76 min, 95% CI: [-41.74, 2.23], p < 0.01, I² = 75%), and length of hospital stay (MD: -0.48 days, 95% CI: [-0.93, -0.04], p < 0.01, I² = 32%). No significant differences were found in the postoperative complications assessed. In the dosage analysis, the preoperative 20 mg/kg regimen, along with the intraoperative maintenance dose of 1 mg/kg/h, was more effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss in the TXA group, although not statistically significant (323.64 ml vs. 145.54 ml, p = 0.29). The administration of TXA in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection surgery showed beneficial results in all efficacy outcomes evaluated, without increasing postoperative complications. However, further studies, especially multicenter ones, are needed to confirm our results.
我们回顾了随机试验中颅内脑膜瘤切除术患者静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)的有效性和安全性,特别强调了不同剂量的影响。在以下数据库中进行了全面的搜索:Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Lilacs和Web of Science。两位审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,审阅全文并收集数据。疗效结果分析包括术中出血量、输血率、手术时间和住院时间。安全性结果评估包括术后并发症,如癫痫发作、血栓栓塞事件和血肿。根据给药剂量和给药时间进行亚组分析。纳入6项随机对照试验(rct),共881例患者。数据荟萃分析显示,使用TXA可显著减少术中出血量(Mean Difference [MD] = -270.26 ml, 95% CI [-422.84, -117.67], p
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.