Navigating complex arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: the role of the splenic artery as a viable conduit.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02709-4
Hosam Hamed, Mohamed Elshobary, Tarek Salah, Ahmad M Sultan, El-Sayed Abou El-Magd, Ahmed M Elsabbagh, Ahmed Shehta, Mohamed Abdulrazek, Waleed Elsarraf, Mohamed A Elmorshedi, Mostafa Abdelkhalek, Usama Shiha, Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek, Mohamed Abdel Wahab
{"title":"Navigating complex arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: the role of the splenic artery as a viable conduit.","authors":"Hosam Hamed, Mohamed Elshobary, Tarek Salah, Ahmad M Sultan, El-Sayed Abou El-Magd, Ahmed M Elsabbagh, Ahmed Shehta, Mohamed Abdulrazek, Waleed Elsarraf, Mohamed A Elmorshedi, Mostafa Abdelkhalek, Usama Shiha, Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek, Mohamed Abdel Wahab","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02709-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), maintaining hepatic arterial flow is critical for graft survival. Alternative methods are required when the recipient's hepatic artery is unsuitable due to extensive dissection or inadequate flow. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of splenic artery transposition (SAT) for hepatic arterial reconstruction in LDLT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 10 LDLT patients with hepatic arterial reconstruction by SAT to assess operative parameters, postoperative complications, mortality, and patency rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The splenic artery was used because of arterial dissection (70%) or inadequate arterial blood flow. Operative time ranged from 640 to 1020 min, and no splenic infarction was observed. Post-operative complications were as follows; biliary leakage (10%), pancreatitis (10%), intraabdominal hemorrhage (10%), and arterial thrombosis (10%). Mortality in this cohort was 30%, one of them was due to thrombosis of the conduit and the other two died from sepsis-related complications. With a median follow-up of 43 months, this technique was associated with a 70% survival rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The splenic artery is a viable conduit for hepatic arterial reconstruction in LDLT, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile and complication rates. This approach is recommended in cases where the recipient's hepatic artery is significantly compromised.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02709-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), maintaining hepatic arterial flow is critical for graft survival. Alternative methods are required when the recipient's hepatic artery is unsuitable due to extensive dissection or inadequate flow. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of splenic artery transposition (SAT) for hepatic arterial reconstruction in LDLT.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 10 LDLT patients with hepatic arterial reconstruction by SAT to assess operative parameters, postoperative complications, mortality, and patency rate.

Results: The splenic artery was used because of arterial dissection (70%) or inadequate arterial blood flow. Operative time ranged from 640 to 1020 min, and no splenic infarction was observed. Post-operative complications were as follows; biliary leakage (10%), pancreatitis (10%), intraabdominal hemorrhage (10%), and arterial thrombosis (10%). Mortality in this cohort was 30%, one of them was due to thrombosis of the conduit and the other two died from sepsis-related complications. With a median follow-up of 43 months, this technique was associated with a 70% survival rate.

Conclusion: The splenic artery is a viable conduit for hepatic arterial reconstruction in LDLT, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile and complication rates. This approach is recommended in cases where the recipient's hepatic artery is significantly compromised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植中复杂动脉重建导航:脾动脉作为可行导管的作用。
背景:在活体肝移植(LDLT)中,维持肝动脉血流是移植物存活的关键。当接受者的肝动脉因广泛剥离或血流不足而不适合时,需要其他方法。本研究评估脾动脉转位(SAT)在LDLT肝动脉重建中的有效性和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入10例经肝动脉重建的LDLT患者,评估手术参数、术后并发症、死亡率和通畅率。结果:脾动脉因动脉夹层或动脉血流量不足而行脾动脉手术(70%)。手术时间640 ~ 1020min,未见脾梗死。术后并发症如下:胆道渗漏(10%)、胰腺炎(10%)、腹腔出血(10%)和动脉血栓形成(10%)。该队列的死亡率为30%,其中一人死于导管血栓形成,另外两人死于败血症相关并发症。中位随访时间为43个月,该技术的生存率为70%。结论:脾动脉是LDLT肝动脉重建的可行通道,具有可接受的安全性和并发症发生率。在受体肝动脉明显受损的情况下,推荐采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on recovery following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Rapid awake airway stabilization by direct tracheal intubation through an open cervical wound in severe laryngotracheal injury: a case report. Expanded use of triclosan-coated sutures for surgical site infection prevention in oesophageal cancer surgery. Neoadjuvant or conversion therapy nullifies the prognostic impact of surgical margin width in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study. Timeframes for "early" mobilisation after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery: evidence- and consensus-based suggestions of definitions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1