Evaluation of parent reminder-recall letters to promote human papillomavirus vaccination.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Preventive Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102942
Joan M Griffin, Xuan Zhu, Wei Yi Kong, Robert M Jacobson, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Jennifer L St Sauver, Jeph Herrin, Gregory D Jenkins, Nicole L Larson, Lila J Finney Rutten
{"title":"Evaluation of parent reminder-recall letters to promote human papillomavirus vaccination.","authors":"Joan M Griffin, Xuan Zhu, Wei Yi Kong, Robert M Jacobson, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Jennifer L St Sauver, Jeph Herrin, Gregory D Jenkins, Nicole L Larson, Lila J Finney Rutten","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remains suboptimal. Our stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial found that reminder-recall letters sent to parents of age-eligible children significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to usual care. Subsequently, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the mechanisms of the letter's effectiveness. This study evaluated who remembered the letter, use of provided resources, and child vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional evaluation included data from parents (<i>n</i> = 1165) of adolescents ages 11-12 from six primary care practices who received letters about their child's HPV vaccination status. From 2018 to 2022, parents were mailed reminder-recall letters and then sent questionnaires 12-15 months after receiving the letter. Questionnaires asked if parents recalled the letter, whether their child received a vaccination and, if not, reasons for not vaccinating, and attitudes and beliefs about HPV vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1165 of 1991 questionnaires were completed (59 %). Over half (58 %) remembered the reminder-recall letter. Compared to those not remembering the letter, those who did were significantly more likely to have had their child vaccinated (56 % versus 44 %, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Of those who remembered the letter but did not vaccinate, the majority reported misperceptions about their child being too young (26 %) or concerns about vaccine safety (20 %). Of those who did not remember the letter and did not vaccinate, the primary reason was not knowing the child was due for vaccination (27 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reminder-recall letters cued the majority of parents to complete HPV vaccination; however, vaccine misperceptions remain a challenge, indicating the need for additional communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"49 ","pages":"102942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remains suboptimal. Our stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial found that reminder-recall letters sent to parents of age-eligible children significantly increased vaccine uptake compared to usual care. Subsequently, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the mechanisms of the letter's effectiveness. This study evaluated who remembered the letter, use of provided resources, and child vaccination status.

Methods: This cross-sectional evaluation included data from parents (n = 1165) of adolescents ages 11-12 from six primary care practices who received letters about their child's HPV vaccination status. From 2018 to 2022, parents were mailed reminder-recall letters and then sent questionnaires 12-15 months after receiving the letter. Questionnaires asked if parents recalled the letter, whether their child received a vaccination and, if not, reasons for not vaccinating, and attitudes and beliefs about HPV vaccination.

Results: A total of 1165 of 1991 questionnaires were completed (59 %). Over half (58 %) remembered the reminder-recall letter. Compared to those not remembering the letter, those who did were significantly more likely to have had their child vaccinated (56 % versus 44 %, p < 0.05). Of those who remembered the letter but did not vaccinate, the majority reported misperceptions about their child being too young (26 %) or concerns about vaccine safety (20 %). Of those who did not remember the letter and did not vaccinate, the primary reason was not knowing the child was due for vaccination (27 %).

Conclusions: Reminder-recall letters cued the majority of parents to complete HPV vaccination; however, vaccine misperceptions remain a challenge, indicating the need for additional communication strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的家长提醒召回信的评价。
目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的摄取仍然不够理想。我们的楔步聚类随机试验发现,与常规护理相比,向适龄儿童的父母发送提醒召回信显著增加了疫苗的吸收率。随后,我们进行了流程评估,以评估信函有效性的机制。这项研究评估了谁记住了这封信,所提供的资源的使用,以及儿童的疫苗接种状况。方法:这项横断面评估包括来自6个初级保健诊所的11-12岁青少年父母(n = 1165)的数据,这些父母收到了关于其孩子HPV疫苗接种状况的信件。从2018年到2022年,父母们收到了提醒召回信,然后在收到信的12-15个月后发送了问卷。问卷询问父母是否记得这封信,他们的孩子是否接种了疫苗,如果没有,不接种疫苗的原因,以及对HPV疫苗接种的态度和信念。结果:1991份问卷共完成1165份(59%)。超过一半(58%)的人记得这封提醒召回信。与那些不记得这封信的人相比,那些记得这封信的人更有可能让他们的孩子接种疫苗(56%对44%,p)结论:提醒召回信提示大多数父母完成HPV疫苗接种;然而,对疫苗的误解仍然是一个挑战,这表明需要制定更多的宣传战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
Changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health over 15 years in Wisconsin, United States. Smoke-free hospitality environments and cognitive health: A population-based study in the United States. The prevalence and burden of musculoskeletal disorders amongst Indigenous people in Pimicikamak, northern Manitoba, Canada: A community health survey. General practitioner-centered rural obesity management: Design, protocol and baseline data of the German HAPpEN pragmatic trial. A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1