Auto-expandable metallic ureteral stents for complex ureteral stenosis: long term outcomes in a tertiary institution.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1159/000542941
Marina Mata, Inés María Laso-García, Javier Lorca-Álvaro, Gemma Duque-Ruiz, Fernando Arias-Fúnez, Manuel Hevia, Enrique López-Pérez, Francisco Burgos-Revilla
{"title":"Auto-expandable metallic ureteral stents for complex ureteral stenosis: long term outcomes in a tertiary institution.","authors":"Marina Mata, Inés María Laso-García, Javier Lorca-Álvaro, Gemma Duque-Ruiz, Fernando Arias-Fúnez, Manuel Hevia, Enrique López-Pérez, Francisco Burgos-Revilla","doi":"10.1159/000542941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Auto-expandable ureteral stents can be an alternative to percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) in refractory ureteral stenosis. Our aim is to analyse results and complications of ureteral stents in our centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of OptiMed® expandable ureteral stents placed in our centre (1996-2022). Analysis of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Kaplan-Meier curves (long-rank test) to assess stent permeability and Cox regression for associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 patients were included. Median follow-up: 36 months (11-82). Median age: 61 years (48-68). Most frequent aetiology of ureteral stenosis was malignancy in 30 cases (53.6%). The most common location of stricture was distal ureter in 44 (63.8%) ureteral strictures. Creatinine levels improved in 28(48.3%) cases. Most common acute complication was UTI in 6(3.4%) patients (Clavien-Dindo II). 20 patients presented with stent obstruction. 14(24.1%) were solved with double J stenting and 6(10.3%) cases with PCN. Mean stent survival time was 50 months (34.3-65.8). By the end of follow up, 23(39.6%) patients were alive. Of those, 9(39.1%) had a functioning stent. No association of any factor with patency of stent was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expandable ureteral stents are an alternative to PCN in fragile patients with refractory stenosis, which offers a better quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Auto-expandable ureteral stents can be an alternative to percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) in refractory ureteral stenosis. Our aim is to analyse results and complications of ureteral stents in our centre.

Methods: Retrospective review of OptiMed® expandable ureteral stents placed in our centre (1996-2022). Analysis of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). Kaplan-Meier curves (long-rank test) to assess stent permeability and Cox regression for associated factors.

Results: 58 patients were included. Median follow-up: 36 months (11-82). Median age: 61 years (48-68). Most frequent aetiology of ureteral stenosis was malignancy in 30 cases (53.6%). The most common location of stricture was distal ureter in 44 (63.8%) ureteral strictures. Creatinine levels improved in 28(48.3%) cases. Most common acute complication was UTI in 6(3.4%) patients (Clavien-Dindo II). 20 patients presented with stent obstruction. 14(24.1%) were solved with double J stenting and 6(10.3%) cases with PCN. Mean stent survival time was 50 months (34.3-65.8). By the end of follow up, 23(39.6%) patients were alive. Of those, 9(39.1%) had a functioning stent. No association of any factor with patency of stent was found.

Conclusions: Expandable ureteral stents are an alternative to PCN in fragile patients with refractory stenosis, which offers a better quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
期刊最新文献
Auto-expandable metallic ureteral stents for complex ureteral stenosis: long term outcomes in a tertiary institution. Adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma: real-world experiences from a retrospective, multi-institutional cohort. Does time matter in early radical cystectomy? Comparing outcome, clinical and pathological characteristics of immediate versus deferred radical cystectomy. Spinal anesthesia vs general anesthesia in the endoscopic management of proximal ureteral stones: A critical evaluation focusing on the total anesthesia time. Discrimination of T-stage using tumor weight and size - a potential approach to guide perioperative decision making in patients with bladder cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1