Thorsten H Ecke, Johan Styrke, Kiran Jagarlamudi, Stig Linder
{"title":"Development of point-of-care tests for urinary bladder cancer - an historic review and view to future prospectives.","authors":"Thorsten H Ecke, Johan Styrke, Kiran Jagarlamudi, Stig Linder","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urine is an attractive biospecimen for noninvasive tests to facilitate bladder tumor diagnostics. Three different point-of-care (POC) tests based on lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) are currently commercially available: UBC® Rapid Test, BTA stat®, and NMP22<sup>TM</sup> BladderChek. The present review discusses these different tests based on their performance, clinical utility and the nature of the respective analytes. The level of sensitivities of UBC Rapid Test® and BTA stat® for detection of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer using urine is in the order of 80%. Estimations of performance are highly dependent on patient selection criteria. UBC® Rapid Test shows a sensitivity of approximately 85% in patients presenting with macrohematuria which is the most common initial clinical symptom. Estimations of specificity are complicated by differences in how control groups are selected in different studies and are therefore more difficult to compare between published reports. Different POC tests differ with regard to the source of the analytes that are measured. The BTA Stat® test is based on detection of plasma proteins (Factor H/Factor H-related proteins), potentially leading to a lack of specificity during conditions of renal dysfunction. A large number of analytes to be used for urine-based bladder cancer tests have been described in the literature, including cytokines and proteases implicated in tumor invasion. These proteins, although biologically relevant, are often present at very low levels in urine that may be unsuitable for development of LFAs. Release of abundant intracellular structural proteins from cells such as cytokeratins (UBC® Rapid Test) and nuclear matrix proteins (NMP22<sup>TM</sup>) may therefore be advantageous. We conclude that available data support the use of urine-based POC tests as adjuncts during the clinical work up of suspected bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urine is an attractive biospecimen for noninvasive tests to facilitate bladder tumor diagnostics. Three different point-of-care (POC) tests based on lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) are currently commercially available: UBC® Rapid Test, BTA stat®, and NMP22TM BladderChek. The present review discusses these different tests based on their performance, clinical utility and the nature of the respective analytes. The level of sensitivities of UBC Rapid Test® and BTA stat® for detection of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer using urine is in the order of 80%. Estimations of performance are highly dependent on patient selection criteria. UBC® Rapid Test shows a sensitivity of approximately 85% in patients presenting with macrohematuria which is the most common initial clinical symptom. Estimations of specificity are complicated by differences in how control groups are selected in different studies and are therefore more difficult to compare between published reports. Different POC tests differ with regard to the source of the analytes that are measured. The BTA Stat® test is based on detection of plasma proteins (Factor H/Factor H-related proteins), potentially leading to a lack of specificity during conditions of renal dysfunction. A large number of analytes to be used for urine-based bladder cancer tests have been described in the literature, including cytokines and proteases implicated in tumor invasion. These proteins, although biologically relevant, are often present at very low levels in urine that may be unsuitable for development of LFAs. Release of abundant intracellular structural proteins from cells such as cytokeratins (UBC® Rapid Test) and nuclear matrix proteins (NMP22TM) may therefore be advantageous. We conclude that available data support the use of urine-based POC tests as adjuncts during the clinical work up of suspected bladder cancer.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.