Development of point-of-care tests for urinary bladder cancer - an historic review and view to future prospectives.

Thorsten H Ecke, Johan Styrke, Kiran Jagarlamudi, Stig Linder
{"title":"Development of point-of-care tests for urinary bladder cancer - an historic review and view to future prospectives.","authors":"Thorsten H Ecke, Johan Styrke, Kiran Jagarlamudi, Stig Linder","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urine is an attractive biospecimen for noninvasive tests to facilitate bladder tumor diagnostics. Three different point-of-care (POC) tests based on lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) are currently commercially available: UBC® Rapid Test, BTA stat®, and NMP22<sup>TM</sup> BladderChek. The present review discusses these different tests based on their performance, clinical utility and the nature of the respective analytes. The level of sensitivities of UBC Rapid Test® and BTA stat® for detection of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer using urine is in the order of 80%. Estimations of performance are highly dependent on patient selection criteria. UBC® Rapid Test shows a sensitivity of approximately 85% in patients presenting with macrohematuria which is the most common initial clinical symptom. Estimations of specificity are complicated by differences in how control groups are selected in different studies and are therefore more difficult to compare between published reports. Different POC tests differ with regard to the source of the analytes that are measured. The BTA Stat® test is based on detection of plasma proteins (Factor H/Factor H-related proteins), potentially leading to a lack of specificity during conditions of renal dysfunction. A large number of analytes to be used for urine-based bladder cancer tests have been described in the literature, including cytokines and proteases implicated in tumor invasion. These proteins, although biologically relevant, are often present at very low levels in urine that may be unsuitable for development of LFAs. Release of abundant intracellular structural proteins from cells such as cytokeratins (UBC® Rapid Test) and nuclear matrix proteins (NMP22<sup>TM</sup>) may therefore be advantageous. We conclude that available data support the use of urine-based POC tests as adjuncts during the clinical work up of suspected bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urine is an attractive biospecimen for noninvasive tests to facilitate bladder tumor diagnostics. Three different point-of-care (POC) tests based on lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs) are currently commercially available: UBC® Rapid Test, BTA stat®, and NMP22TM BladderChek. The present review discusses these different tests based on their performance, clinical utility and the nature of the respective analytes. The level of sensitivities of UBC Rapid Test® and BTA stat® for detection of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer using urine is in the order of 80%. Estimations of performance are highly dependent on patient selection criteria. UBC® Rapid Test shows a sensitivity of approximately 85% in patients presenting with macrohematuria which is the most common initial clinical symptom. Estimations of specificity are complicated by differences in how control groups are selected in different studies and are therefore more difficult to compare between published reports. Different POC tests differ with regard to the source of the analytes that are measured. The BTA Stat® test is based on detection of plasma proteins (Factor H/Factor H-related proteins), potentially leading to a lack of specificity during conditions of renal dysfunction. A large number of analytes to be used for urine-based bladder cancer tests have been described in the literature, including cytokines and proteases implicated in tumor invasion. These proteins, although biologically relevant, are often present at very low levels in urine that may be unsuitable for development of LFAs. Release of abundant intracellular structural proteins from cells such as cytokeratins (UBC® Rapid Test) and nuclear matrix proteins (NMP22TM) may therefore be advantageous. We conclude that available data support the use of urine-based POC tests as adjuncts during the clinical work up of suspected bladder cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱癌即时检测技术的发展——历史回顾与未来展望
尿液是一种有吸引力的生物标本,用于无创检查,以促进膀胱肿瘤的诊断。目前市面上有三种不同的基于侧流免疫测定(LFAs)的即时检测(POC): UBC®Rapid Test、BTA stat®和NMP22TM BladderChek。目前的审查讨论这些不同的测试基于他们的性能,临床用途和各自的分析物的性质。UBC Rapid Test®和BTA stat®用于尿液检测高级别非肌性浸润性膀胱癌的敏感性水平约为80%。性能评估高度依赖于患者选择标准。UBC®快速检测显示,对于以大血尿为最常见的初始临床症状的患者,其敏感性约为85%。由于在不同的研究中如何选择对照组的差异,特异性的估计变得复杂,因此更难在已发表的报告之间进行比较。不同的POC测试根据所测分析物的来源而有所不同。BTA Stat®检测基于血浆蛋白(因子H/因子H相关蛋白)的检测,可能导致肾功能不全时缺乏特异性。大量的分析物将被用于基于尿的膀胱癌测试已经在文献中描述,包括细胞因子和蛋白酶涉及肿瘤侵袭。尽管这些蛋白具有生物学相关性,但它们在尿液中的含量通常很低,可能不适合LFAs的发展。因此,从细胞中释放丰富的细胞内结构蛋白,如细胞角蛋白(UBC®Rapid Test)和核基质蛋白(NMP22TM)可能是有利的。我们的结论是,现有数据支持在疑似膀胱癌的临床工作中使用基于尿液的POC检测作为辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Functional, oncological, regret and complications following partial gland cryo-ablation for low-risk prostate cancer associated with MPMRI targets. Cumulative smoking exposure impacts oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Impact of baseline PD-L1 status in BCG naive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer on outcomes and changes after BCG exposure. Safety and efficacy of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation for superficial recurrence following bladder-sparing therapy of muscle invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study. Reducing infectious complications and healthcare costs in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with single-dose cefmetazole and levofloxacin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1