Comparison of Nurses' Workload and Multiple Organ Failure of Patients Hospitalized in the COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Units.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_374_22
Mohammad Moradi, Lilia de Souza Nogueira, Nasrin Hanifi
{"title":"Comparison of Nurses' Workload and Multiple Organ Failure of Patients Hospitalized in the COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Mohammad Moradi, Lilia de Souza Nogueira, Nasrin Hanifi","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_374_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring nurses' workload and related factors in intensive care units and reviewing their staffing is very important during COVID-19. This study aims to compare nurses' workload and multiple organ failure of patients hospitalized during the COVID-19 in intensive care units and non-COVID-19 intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted with 768 patients hospitalized in intensive care units and Zanjan City (Iran) intensive care units in 2021. The data were collected using the Nursing Activities Score and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Data analysis was performed by independent <i>t</i>-test, Chi-squared (χ<sup>2</sup>) test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The statistical significance level was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NAS in non-COVID-19 intensive care units 59.90% (10.03) was significantly higher than that of COVID-19 intensive care units 56.38% (6.67) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the SOFA score was higher in the non-COVID-19 intensive care units 6.98 (3.89) than in COVID-19 intensive care units 5.62 (3.98) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Nursing Activities Score had a positive and statistically significant relationship with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in both units, and this relationship was higher in the COVID-19 intensive care units (r = 0.71). In addition, predictors of NAS were identified as four variables, i.e. consciousness level, SOFA, length of stay, and having an artificial airway (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-COVID-19 ICUs had higher NAS and SOFA scores in the study. Further investigation is needed to identify additional workload aspects in intensive care units.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":"29 6","pages":"691-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_374_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring nurses' workload and related factors in intensive care units and reviewing their staffing is very important during COVID-19. This study aims to compare nurses' workload and multiple organ failure of patients hospitalized during the COVID-19 in intensive care units and non-COVID-19 intensive care units.

Materials and methods: An observational study was conducted with 768 patients hospitalized in intensive care units and Zanjan City (Iran) intensive care units in 2021. The data were collected using the Nursing Activities Score and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Data analysis was performed by independent t-test, Chi-squared (χ2) test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results: NAS in non-COVID-19 intensive care units 59.90% (10.03) was significantly higher than that of COVID-19 intensive care units 56.38% (6.67) (p < 0.001). In addition, the SOFA score was higher in the non-COVID-19 intensive care units 6.98 (3.89) than in COVID-19 intensive care units 5.62 (3.98) (p < 0.001). The Nursing Activities Score had a positive and statistically significant relationship with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in both units, and this relationship was higher in the COVID-19 intensive care units (r = 0.71). In addition, predictors of NAS were identified as four variables, i.e. consciousness level, SOFA, length of stay, and having an artificial airway (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Non-COVID-19 ICUs had higher NAS and SOFA scores in the study. Further investigation is needed to identify additional workload aspects in intensive care units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19重症监护病房与非COVID-19重症监护病房住院患者护士工作量及多器官功能衰竭的比较
背景:在新冠肺炎疫情期间,测量重症监护病房护士工作量及相关因素并对其人员配置进行审查是非常重要的。本研究旨在比较重症监护病房和非重症监护病房在COVID-19期间住院患者的护士工作量和多器官衰竭情况。材料和方法:对2021年在伊朗赞詹市重症监护病房和重症监护病房住院的768名患者进行了一项观察性研究。数据收集采用护理活动评分和顺序器官衰竭评估。采用独立t检验、χ2检验、Pearson相关系数(r)和多元线性回归(MLR)对数据进行分析。差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。结果:非重症监护病房NAS 59.90%(10.03)显著高于重症监护病房56.38% (6.67)(p < 0.001)。非重症监护病房的SOFA评分为6.98(3.89),高于重症监护病房的5.62 (3.98)(p < 0.001)。两个科室的护理活动评分与序贯器官衰竭评分呈正相关,且有统计学意义,在COVID-19重症监护病房,这种关系更高(r = 0.71)。此外,NAS的预测因素被确定为四个变量,即意识水平、SOFA、住院时间和是否使用人工气道(p < 0.05)。结论:研究中非covid -19 icu的NAS和SOFA评分较高。需要进一步调查以确定重症监护病房的额外工作量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Multidimensional Nursing Interventions on the Incidence of Delirium in Patients with COVID-19. The Effects of Chamomile and Flaxseed on Pelvic Pain, Dyspareunia, and Dysmenorrhea in Endometriosis: A Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. The Effects of Local Heating on Facilitating Radial Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Role of Physical Activity in COVID-19 Mortality Rate: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Fatigue and Moral Distress in Emergency Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1