Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.102616
Hiroki Katayama, Takuya Kobata, Motonori Kitaoka, Shigeo Takahashi, Toru Shibata
{"title":"Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques.","authors":"Hiroki Katayama, Takuya Kobata, Motonori Kitaoka, Shigeo Takahashi, Toru Shibata","doi":"10.5603/rpor.102616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve near equal plan quality in single-isocenter multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) errors during beam delivery on the dose distribution for each technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 10-mm diameter delineation of the three targets was employed on the computed tomography images of a head phantom, and the reference plans were created using the DCAT and VMAT. We simulated the systematic opened and closed MLC errors. 10 MLC error plans with different magnitudes of errors were created in each technique. We investigated the relationship between the magnitude of MLC errors and the change in dose-volume histogram parameters of the targets and normal brain tissue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage change in the D<sub>98%</sub> (Gy) and D<sub>0.1%</sub> (Gy) of the target per millimeter of the MLC errors were 13.3% and 2.7% for the DCAT and 15.3% and 9.3% for the VMAT, respectively. The fluctuations of the maximum dose were very small for the DCAT compared to the VMAT. Changes in the V<sub>12Gy</sub> (cc) of the normal brain tissue were 47.1%/mm and 53.2%/mm for the DCAT and VMAT, respectively, which are comparable changes for both techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the impact of MLC errors on the target coverage and the normal brain tissue is comparable for both techniques, the internal dose of the targets generated by the DCAT technique is robust to the MLC errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 5","pages":"531-543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.102616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve near equal plan quality in single-isocenter multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) errors during beam delivery on the dose distribution for each technique.

Materials and methods: A 10-mm diameter delineation of the three targets was employed on the computed tomography images of a head phantom, and the reference plans were created using the DCAT and VMAT. We simulated the systematic opened and closed MLC errors. 10 MLC error plans with different magnitudes of errors were created in each technique. We investigated the relationship between the magnitude of MLC errors and the change in dose-volume histogram parameters of the targets and normal brain tissue.

Results: The percentage change in the D98% (Gy) and D0.1% (Gy) of the target per millimeter of the MLC errors were 13.3% and 2.7% for the DCAT and 15.3% and 9.3% for the VMAT, respectively. The fluctuations of the maximum dose were very small for the DCAT compared to the VMAT. Changes in the V12Gy (cc) of the normal brain tissue were 47.1%/mm and 53.2%/mm for the DCAT and VMAT, respectively, which are comparable changes for both techniques.

Conclusions: Although the impact of MLC errors on the target coverage and the normal brain tissue is comparable for both techniques, the internal dose of the targets generated by the DCAT technique is robust to the MLC errors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MLC误差对SRS治疗单等中心多发脑转移瘤剂量分布的影响:DCAT与VMAT技术的比较
背景:动态适形电弧治疗(DCAT)和体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)在脑转移的单等中心多靶点立体定向放射治疗(SRS)中可以达到接近相等的计划质量。本研究旨在探讨光束传递过程中多叶准直器(MLC)误差对每种技术剂量分布的影响。材料和方法:在头部幻影的计算机断层图像上采用直径10 mm的三个靶点的划定,并使用DCAT和VMAT创建参考平面图。模拟了系统的MLC开闭误差。每种技术创建了10个误差大小不同的MLC误差图。我们研究了MLC误差的大小与靶组织和正常脑组织剂量-体积直方图参数的变化之间的关系。结果:MLC误差的D98% (Gy)和D0.1% (Gy)的变化百分比DCAT分别为13.3%和2.7%,VMAT为15.3%和9.3%。与VMAT相比,DCAT的最大剂量波动非常小。DCAT和VMAT的正常脑组织V12Gy (cc)变化分别为47.1%/mm和53.2%/mm,这两种技术的变化具有可比性。结论:虽然两种技术的MLC误差对靶覆盖和正常脑组织的影响是相当的,但DCAT技术产生的靶内剂量对MLC误差具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
期刊最新文献
Prehabilitation approaches for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a narrative review. Reirradiation of gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: efficacy and tolerance analysis at a single center. Tracing prostate cancer - the evolution of PET-CT applications. Treatment of oropharyngeal cancer during the COVID-19 lockdown - outcomes for patients treated during the pandemic. Can the reprogrammed cancer cells serve as an alternative source of (induced) cancer stem cells?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1