The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849
Priyankar K Datta, Prachee Sathe, Avishek Roy, Tanima Baronia, Anirban Bhattacharjee, Riddhi Kundu
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"Priyankar K Datta, Prachee Sathe, Avishek Roy, Tanima Baronia, Anirban Bhattacharjee, Riddhi Kundu","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Heart rate control using beta-blockers in sepsis has traditionally been avoided because of concerns with worsening cardiac index and organ perfusion. Recent studies has explored the possible beneficial effects of targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock who have tachycardia despite initial resuscitation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of heart rate control in septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock treated with targeted rate control. The literature search was done to include studies from January 2013 to December 2023. Two independent researchers independently assessed the studies and included RCTS in which adult patients (>18 years of age) with septic shock were treated with targeted heart rate control vs placebo after initial resuscitation due to persistent tachycardia. The study data was extracted by two independent researchers. A random effects model was used to present the results. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies with a pooled sample size of 807 participants were included in the analysis.Eight of the included studies with a pooled sample size of 766 reported 28-day mortality. Targeted heart rate control was associated with a trend toward lower 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.04; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 48%]. Trial sequential analysis showed the cumulative effect lying within the zone of uncertainty, with diversity-adjusted required information size of 1,756 and pooled effect size of the pooled RR 0.78 (alpha-spending adjusted 95% CI: 0.53-1.15). There was a statistically significant lower heart rate associated with rate control (MD: -16.66; 95% CI: -23.89 to -9.42; <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) but no difference in mean arterial pressure. cardiac index, lactate levels, norepinephrine (NE) requirements, and ICU length of stay (LOS) in between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock may be tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint. However, the beneficial effect on mortality is less certain than was reported in the initial studies.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Datta PK, Sathe P, Roy A, Baronia T, Bhattacharjee A, Kundu R. The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(12):1170-1179.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"28 12","pages":"1170-1179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Heart rate control using beta-blockers in sepsis has traditionally been avoided because of concerns with worsening cardiac index and organ perfusion. Recent studies has explored the possible beneficial effects of targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock who have tachycardia despite initial resuscitation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of heart rate control in septic shock patients.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock treated with targeted rate control. The literature search was done to include studies from January 2013 to December 2023. Two independent researchers independently assessed the studies and included RCTS in which adult patients (>18 years of age) with septic shock were treated with targeted heart rate control vs placebo after initial resuscitation due to persistent tachycardia. The study data was extracted by two independent researchers. A random effects model was used to present the results. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality.

Results: A total of 9 studies with a pooled sample size of 807 participants were included in the analysis.Eight of the included studies with a pooled sample size of 766 reported 28-day mortality. Targeted heart rate control was associated with a trend toward lower 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04; I 2 = 48%]. Trial sequential analysis showed the cumulative effect lying within the zone of uncertainty, with diversity-adjusted required information size of 1,756 and pooled effect size of the pooled RR 0.78 (alpha-spending adjusted 95% CI: 0.53-1.15). There was a statistically significant lower heart rate associated with rate control (MD: -16.66; 95% CI: -23.89 to -9.42; p-value < 0.001) but no difference in mean arterial pressure. cardiac index, lactate levels, norepinephrine (NE) requirements, and ICU length of stay (LOS) in between the groups.

Conclusion: Targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock may be tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint. However, the beneficial effect on mortality is less certain than was reported in the initial studies.

How to cite this article: Datta PK, Sathe P, Roy A, Baronia T, Bhattacharjee A, Kundu R. The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(12):1170-1179.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标心率控制在感染性休克中的临床应用:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:由于担心心脏指数和器官灌注恶化,传统上避免在败血症中使用β受体阻滞剂来控制心率。最近的研究已经探讨了目标心率控制在感染性休克患者中可能的有益作用,这些患者在最初复苏后仍有心动过速。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以探讨心率控制对感染性休克患者的影响。方法:对PubMed、Cochrane Central和Embase注册的随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较采用目标率控制治疗的败血症和感染性休克患者的死亡率。文献检索包括2013年1月至2023年12月的研究。两名独立研究人员独立评估了这些研究,并纳入了随机对照试验,在这些随机对照试验中,因持续性心动过速而首次复苏的感染性休克成年患者(bb0 - 18岁)接受了靶向心率控制治疗,而不是安慰剂。研究数据是由两位独立的研究人员提取的。采用随机效应模型来表示结果。对28天死亡率这一主要结局进行了试验序列分析(TSA)。结果:共纳入9项研究,合并样本量为807名参与者。纳入的8项研究的总样本量为766,报告了28天死亡率。目标心率控制与降低28天死亡率的趋势相关[风险比(RR): 0.78;95% ci: 0.62-0.99;P = 0.04;i2 = 48%]。试验序列分析显示,累积效应处于不确定区域,多样性调整后所需信息大小为1756,合并效应大小的合并RR为0.78 (α -花费调整后95% CI: 0.53-1.15)。与心率控制相关的心率降低具有统计学意义(MD: -16.66;95% CI: -23.89 ~ -9.42;p值< 0.001),但平均动脉压无差异。两组之间的心脏指数、乳酸水平、去甲肾上腺素(NE)需求和ICU住院时间(LOS)。结论:从血流动力学的角度来看,感染性休克患者的目标心率控制是可以耐受的。然而,对死亡率的有益影响并不像最初研究中报道的那样确定。Datta PK, Sathe P, Roy A, Baronia T, Bhattacharjee A, Kundu R.针对性心率控制在感染性休克中的临床应用:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。中华急诊医学杂志;2009;28(12):1170-1179。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
期刊最新文献
C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Inflammatory Marker for Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and/or Sepsis in Polytraumatized Patients in ICU. Diagnose Pediatric Delirium Preferentially by Psychiatric Examination, as CAPD Has Low Specificity. Enhancing Post-Code Blue Debriefing through Identification and Overcoming Barriers Encountered by Healthcare Practitioners. From Narrative to Navigation-A Translational Roadmap for AI-enabled Early Sepsis Prediction: Comment on Shanmugam et al. Prognostic Nutritional Index and Urea-albumin Ratio: Novel Mortality Predictors for Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1