The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849
Priyankar K Datta, Prachee Sathe, Avishek Roy, Tanima Baronia, Anirban Bhattacharjee, Riddhi Kundu
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"Priyankar K Datta, Prachee Sathe, Avishek Roy, Tanima Baronia, Anirban Bhattacharjee, Riddhi Kundu","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Heart rate control using beta-blockers in sepsis has traditionally been avoided because of concerns with worsening cardiac index and organ perfusion. Recent studies has explored the possible beneficial effects of targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock who have tachycardia despite initial resuscitation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of heart rate control in septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock treated with targeted rate control. The literature search was done to include studies from January 2013 to December 2023. Two independent researchers independently assessed the studies and included RCTS in which adult patients (>18 years of age) with septic shock were treated with targeted heart rate control vs placebo after initial resuscitation due to persistent tachycardia. The study data was extracted by two independent researchers. A random effects model was used to present the results. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies with a pooled sample size of 807 participants were included in the analysis.Eight of the included studies with a pooled sample size of 766 reported 28-day mortality. Targeted heart rate control was associated with a trend toward lower 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.04; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 48%]. Trial sequential analysis showed the cumulative effect lying within the zone of uncertainty, with diversity-adjusted required information size of 1,756 and pooled effect size of the pooled RR 0.78 (alpha-spending adjusted 95% CI: 0.53-1.15). There was a statistically significant lower heart rate associated with rate control (MD: -16.66; 95% CI: -23.89 to -9.42; <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) but no difference in mean arterial pressure. cardiac index, lactate levels, norepinephrine (NE) requirements, and ICU length of stay (LOS) in between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock may be tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint. However, the beneficial effect on mortality is less certain than was reported in the initial studies.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Datta PK, Sathe P, Roy A, Baronia T, Bhattacharjee A, Kundu R. The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(12):1170-1179.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"28 12","pages":"1170-1179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Heart rate control using beta-blockers in sepsis has traditionally been avoided because of concerns with worsening cardiac index and organ perfusion. Recent studies has explored the possible beneficial effects of targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock who have tachycardia despite initial resuscitation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of heart rate control in septic shock patients.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies from PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock treated with targeted rate control. The literature search was done to include studies from January 2013 to December 2023. Two independent researchers independently assessed the studies and included RCTS in which adult patients (>18 years of age) with septic shock were treated with targeted heart rate control vs placebo after initial resuscitation due to persistent tachycardia. The study data was extracted by two independent researchers. A random effects model was used to present the results. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality.

Results: A total of 9 studies with a pooled sample size of 807 participants were included in the analysis.Eight of the included studies with a pooled sample size of 766 reported 28-day mortality. Targeted heart rate control was associated with a trend toward lower 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.99; p = 0.04; I 2 = 48%]. Trial sequential analysis showed the cumulative effect lying within the zone of uncertainty, with diversity-adjusted required information size of 1,756 and pooled effect size of the pooled RR 0.78 (alpha-spending adjusted 95% CI: 0.53-1.15). There was a statistically significant lower heart rate associated with rate control (MD: -16.66; 95% CI: -23.89 to -9.42; p-value < 0.001) but no difference in mean arterial pressure. cardiac index, lactate levels, norepinephrine (NE) requirements, and ICU length of stay (LOS) in between the groups.

Conclusion: Targeted heart rate control in patients with septic shock may be tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint. However, the beneficial effect on mortality is less certain than was reported in the initial studies.

How to cite this article: Datta PK, Sathe P, Roy A, Baronia T, Bhattacharjee A, Kundu R. The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(12):1170-1179.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
期刊最新文献
Prevention of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit through Nonpharmacological Interventions: An Umbrella Review. Risk Factors for Mortality after Out-of-hospital Resuscitation are More Diverse than Assumed. ARDS Ventilation, The Man Behind the Evolution. Association of Glycemic Variability with Outcomes in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Author Response: Continuous Infusion of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine should not be the First Choice to Prevent Postoperative Delirium in Patients after Hip Fracture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1