Selectivity in prosociality among older adults: The moderation effect of self- and other-oriented motivation.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1037/pag0000873
Hongmei Lin, Yi-Long Lu, Li Li, Jian Li, Xin Zhang, Helene H Fung
{"title":"Selectivity in prosociality among older adults: The moderation effect of self- and other-oriented motivation.","authors":"Hongmei Lin, Yi-Long Lu, Li Li, Jian Li, Xin Zhang, Helene H Fung","doi":"10.1037/pag0000873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prosociality tends to increase with age, but whether older adults (OA) are more willing than younger adults (YA) to extend their prosocial behaviors beyond close social circles remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to address this controversy and explore the underlying mechanisms of age-related differences in prosociality through the lens of social discounting and gain-and-loss framing. One hundred twenty-three younger adults and 135 older adults participated in a social discounting task (measuring prosocial tendencies toward various social relationships) with various framings (self-oriented framing, other-oriented framing, and control condition). Compared to younger adults, older adults exhibited higher overall prosociality and treated socially close and distant others more evenly, indicating lower levels of selectivity in prosociality. Notably, the interaction effect between age and framing revealed that other-oriented framing amplified the prosocial tendencies of older adults, particularly toward socially distant others but not younger adults. These findings suggest other-oriented framing specifically reduced older adults' selectivity in prosociality, highlighting their prioritization of others' welfare and aversion to others' losses. This supports the notion that older adults' prosociality may be driven by other-oriented motivation rather than self-interest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosociality tends to increase with age, but whether older adults (OA) are more willing than younger adults (YA) to extend their prosocial behaviors beyond close social circles remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to address this controversy and explore the underlying mechanisms of age-related differences in prosociality through the lens of social discounting and gain-and-loss framing. One hundred twenty-three younger adults and 135 older adults participated in a social discounting task (measuring prosocial tendencies toward various social relationships) with various framings (self-oriented framing, other-oriented framing, and control condition). Compared to younger adults, older adults exhibited higher overall prosociality and treated socially close and distant others more evenly, indicating lower levels of selectivity in prosociality. Notably, the interaction effect between age and framing revealed that other-oriented framing amplified the prosocial tendencies of older adults, particularly toward socially distant others but not younger adults. These findings suggest other-oriented framing specifically reduced older adults' selectivity in prosociality, highlighting their prioritization of others' welfare and aversion to others' losses. This supports the notion that older adults' prosociality may be driven by other-oriented motivation rather than self-interest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人亲社会行为的选择性:自我和他人导向动机的调节作用。
亲社会倾向随着年龄的增长而增加,但老年人(OA)是否比年轻人(YA)更愿意将他们的亲社会行为扩展到亲密的社交圈之外,仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在解决这一争议,并通过社会折现和得失框架的视角探讨亲社会性年龄相关差异的潜在机制。在不同的框架(自我导向框架、他人导向框架和控制条件)下,123名年轻人和135名老年人参与了社会贴现任务(测量对各种社会关系的亲社会倾向)。与年轻人相比,老年人表现出更高的整体亲社会性,对待社会亲密和疏远的人更均匀,表明亲社会性的选择性水平较低。值得注意的是,年龄和框架之间的交互作用表明,其他导向框架放大了老年人的亲社会倾向,特别是对社会疏远的其他人,而不是年轻人。这些发现表明,以他人为导向的框架特别降低了老年人亲社会的选择性,突出了他们对他人福利的优先考虑和对他人损失的厌恶。这支持了这样一种观点,即老年人的亲社会行为可能是由他人导向的动机而不是自身利益驱动的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
期刊最新文献
Can goal reminders reduce the Stroop effect in older adults? Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change. Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors. Age and sex differences in emotion perception are influenced by emotional category and communication channel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1