Randomized clinical trial: the effects of mirtazapine in functional dyspepsia patients.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241311129
Lina Cao, Gaozhong Li, Jingmei Cao, Fuxin Li, Wei Han
{"title":"Randomized clinical trial: the effects of mirtazapine in functional dyspepsia patients.","authors":"Lina Cao, Gaozhong Li, Jingmei Cao, Fuxin Li, Wei Han","doi":"10.1177/17562848241311129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders worldwide. Currently, anti-gastric drugs, gastric acid inhibitors, prokinetic drugs, and mucosal protective drugs are widely used in FD patients, however, only a small proportion of patients benefit from these drugs. Studies reported mirtazapine may improve symptoms of FD patients but the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in the treatment of FD is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in FD patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a prospective, single-randomized, two-group parallel clinical trial involving 120 FD patients with poor traditional drug treatment outcomes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualified patients identified through the screening assessments were randomly divided into two groups: mirtazapine group (<i>n</i> = 60) treated with mirtazapine 15 mg qn on top of traditional drugs, and control group (<i>n</i> = 60) who continued to be treated with traditional drugs. Subjects were evaluated for meal-related symptoms and severity, quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, and body weight before and after the 8-week intervention. Adverse reactions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of 8-week treatment, dyspeptic symptoms in the mirtazapine group were significantly relieved compared with the baseline (7.95 ± 1.86 vs 11.17 ± 2.14, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Assessment of the impact of dyspepsia on patients' quality of life from the short form-Nepean Dyspepsia Index showed that patients generally feel better in mirtazapine group than control group (24.52 ± 2.87 vs 28.64 ± 4.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mirtazapine group also showed significant weight gain and decreased visceral sensitivity index score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with control group, 8-week administration of mirtazapine significantly improved the overall severity of symptoms of dyspepsia (such as individual symptoms of postprandial fullness, early satiation, nausea, and vomiting), gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, quality of life, and increased weight in FD patients. This study provided clues to clinicians that mirtazapine may be a good choice for the treatment of FD patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese clinical trial registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, protocol No. ChiCTR2100048304).</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848241311129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241311129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders worldwide. Currently, anti-gastric drugs, gastric acid inhibitors, prokinetic drugs, and mucosal protective drugs are widely used in FD patients, however, only a small proportion of patients benefit from these drugs. Studies reported mirtazapine may improve symptoms of FD patients but the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in the treatment of FD is unclear.

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in FD patients.

Design: We performed a prospective, single-randomized, two-group parallel clinical trial involving 120 FD patients with poor traditional drug treatment outcomes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine.

Methods: Qualified patients identified through the screening assessments were randomly divided into two groups: mirtazapine group (n = 60) treated with mirtazapine 15 mg qn on top of traditional drugs, and control group (n = 60) who continued to be treated with traditional drugs. Subjects were evaluated for meal-related symptoms and severity, quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, and body weight before and after the 8-week intervention. Adverse reactions were also recorded.

Results: At the end of 8-week treatment, dyspeptic symptoms in the mirtazapine group were significantly relieved compared with the baseline (7.95 ± 1.86 vs 11.17 ± 2.14, p < 0.001). Assessment of the impact of dyspepsia on patients' quality of life from the short form-Nepean Dyspepsia Index showed that patients generally feel better in mirtazapine group than control group (24.52 ± 2.87 vs 28.64 ± 4.32, p < 0.001). Mirtazapine group also showed significant weight gain and decreased visceral sensitivity index score.

Conclusion: Compared with control group, 8-week administration of mirtazapine significantly improved the overall severity of symptoms of dyspepsia (such as individual symptoms of postprandial fullness, early satiation, nausea, and vomiting), gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, quality of life, and increased weight in FD patients. This study provided clues to clinicians that mirtazapine may be a good choice for the treatment of FD patients.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese clinical trial registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, protocol No. ChiCTR2100048304).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机临床试验:米氮平治疗功能性消化不良的疗效。
背景:功能性消化不良(FD)是世界范围内最常见的胃肠道疾病之一。目前,FD患者广泛使用抗胃药物、胃酸抑制剂、促胃动力药物和粘膜保护药物,但只有一小部分患者从这些药物中获益。研究报道米氮平可以改善FD患者的症状,但米氮平治疗FD的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。目的:探讨米氮平治疗FD患者的疗效和安全性。设计:我们进行了一项前瞻性、单随机、两组平行临床试验,纳入120例传统药物治疗效果较差的FD患者,以评估米氮平的疗效和安全性。方法:通过筛选评估筛选出符合条件的患者,随机分为米氮平组(n = 60)和对照组(n = 60),分别在传统药物治疗的基础上给予米氮平15 mg qn治疗。在8周干预前后评估受试者的饮食相关症状和严重程度、生活质量、胃肠道特异性焦虑和体重。同时记录不良反应。结果:治疗8周后,米氮平组患者消化不良症状较基线明显缓解(7.95±1.86 vs 11.17±2.14,p p)。与对照组相比,给予米氮平8周可显著改善FD患者消化不良症状(如餐后饱腹、早饱、恶心、呕吐等个体症状)、胃肠道特异性焦虑、生活质量和体重增加的总体严重程度。本研究为临床医生提供了米氮平可能是治疗FD患者的良好选择的线索。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html,方案号:ChiCTR2100048304)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Real-world safety of linaclotide in Chinese patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a multicenter, single-arm, prospective observational study. Burden of coeliac disease in Germany: real-world insights from a large retrospective health insurance claims database analysis. Efficacy of alternate mucosa-submucosa clip closure in preventing postoperative adverse events for patients with gastric mucosal lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter retrospective study. Innovative approaches in colorectal cancer screening: advances in detection methods and the role of artificial intelligence. The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1