Heparin Versus Saline: A Comparative Study to Support Practice Change Within an Organization.

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000569
Linda Denke, Meredith Allen, Folefac Atem, Kavitha Nair, Ramona Warkola, Miriam Gonzales
{"title":"Heparin Versus Saline: A Comparative Study to Support Practice Change Within an Organization.","authors":"Linda Denke, Meredith Allen, Folefac Atem, Kavitha Nair, Ramona Warkola, Miriam Gonzales","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This nurse-led research study investigates the comparative effectiveness of heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking in blood cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either heparin or 0.9% sodium chloride locking for up to 7 days. Results show no significant difference in maintaining the PICCs' patency between the 2 locking methods. Additionally, heparin was associated with more side effects, higher costs, and increased nursing time compared to 0.9% sodium chloride. These findings support adopting 0.9% sodium chloride for PICC maintenance in blood cancer patients, aiming to enhance patient safety and reduce costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This nurse-led research study investigates the comparative effectiveness of heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking in blood cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either heparin or 0.9% sodium chloride locking for up to 7 days. Results show no significant difference in maintaining the PICCs' patency between the 2 locking methods. Additionally, heparin was associated with more side effects, higher costs, and increased nursing time compared to 0.9% sodium chloride. These findings support adopting 0.9% sodium chloride for PICC maintenance in blood cancer patients, aiming to enhance patient safety and reduce costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝素与生理盐水:一项支持组织内实践变化的比较研究。
这项由护士主导的研究探讨了肝素与0.9%氯化钠锁定在外周血管中心导管(PICCs)的血癌患者中的比较效果。受试者被随机分配接受肝素或0.9%氯化钠锁定长达7天。结果显示,两种锁定方法在维持picc通畅方面无显著差异。此外,与0.9%氯化钠相比,肝素的副作用更大,费用更高,护理时间更长。这些发现支持在血癌患者中采用0.9%氯化钠维持PICC,旨在提高患者安全性并降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
期刊最新文献
A New Year and New Opportunities in Infusion Nursing. Characteristics of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Cannulation in Older Japanese Inpatients. Development and Content Validity of a Questionnaire on Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance and Knowledge of Nursing Professionals Regarding Best Practices. Development and Testing of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Evaluating Nurses in Infusion Therapy. Factors and Strategies Influencing Chemotherapy Safety Among Oncology Nurses: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1