Leonardo Mendes da Silva, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira
{"title":"Ecotoxicological bioassays with terrestrial plants: a holistic view of standards, guidelines, and protocols.","authors":"Leonardo Mendes da Silva, Larissa Fonseca Andrade-Vieira","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face various chemicals that might induce acute and/or long-term harm. To assess these impacts, ecotoxicological bioassays are essential. However, bioassays using animals, particularly mammals, are costly, time-consuming, and raise ethical concerns. In this context, terrestrial plants emerge as a viable alternative to conventional assays. Thus, the aim of this review was to address the history and evolution of plant bioassays, highlighting the main regulations, guidelines, and protocols governing the use of terrestrial plants in ecotoxicological tests. Initially, plant bioassays were employed to assess the cytogenotoxic effects of chemicals, gaining prominence with the GENE-TOX program in the 80s. Subsequently, plants were used in allelopathy bioassays and in studies aimed to examine the ecotoxicity of pesticides in soil. Currently, ecotoxicological bioassays with plants are regulated by specific standards, such as ASTM E1963-22, EPA 600/3-88/029, EPS 1/RM/45, ISO 11269-1, ISO 11269-2, ISO 17126, ISO 18763, ISO 29200, ISO 22030, OECD-208, OECD-227, OCSPP 850.4100, OCSPP 850.4230, OCSPP 850.4800 and OPPTS 850.4200. The existing protocols standardize bioassays in greenhouse and lab environments, and the duration of the tests varies from hours to months. The main ecotoxicological parameters to be analyzed after exposure include germination percentage, survival rate, root length, aerial part length, fresh mass of exposed plants, and phytotoxicity symptoms. In addition, the absorption rate of substances and genotoxic and mutagenic effects might also be assessed. Therefore, data in this review demonstrate that terrestrial plants represent an important tool in the analysis of environmental risks associated with chemicals and might serve as crucial allies in modern ecotoxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-39"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2024.2440876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems face various chemicals that might induce acute and/or long-term harm. To assess these impacts, ecotoxicological bioassays are essential. However, bioassays using animals, particularly mammals, are costly, time-consuming, and raise ethical concerns. In this context, terrestrial plants emerge as a viable alternative to conventional assays. Thus, the aim of this review was to address the history and evolution of plant bioassays, highlighting the main regulations, guidelines, and protocols governing the use of terrestrial plants in ecotoxicological tests. Initially, plant bioassays were employed to assess the cytogenotoxic effects of chemicals, gaining prominence with the GENE-TOX program in the 80s. Subsequently, plants were used in allelopathy bioassays and in studies aimed to examine the ecotoxicity of pesticides in soil. Currently, ecotoxicological bioassays with plants are regulated by specific standards, such as ASTM E1963-22, EPA 600/3-88/029, EPS 1/RM/45, ISO 11269-1, ISO 11269-2, ISO 17126, ISO 18763, ISO 29200, ISO 22030, OECD-208, OECD-227, OCSPP 850.4100, OCSPP 850.4230, OCSPP 850.4800 and OPPTS 850.4200. The existing protocols standardize bioassays in greenhouse and lab environments, and the duration of the tests varies from hours to months. The main ecotoxicological parameters to be analyzed after exposure include germination percentage, survival rate, root length, aerial part length, fresh mass of exposed plants, and phytotoxicity symptoms. In addition, the absorption rate of substances and genotoxic and mutagenic effects might also be assessed. Therefore, data in this review demonstrate that terrestrial plants represent an important tool in the analysis of environmental risks associated with chemicals and might serve as crucial allies in modern ecotoxicology.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health.
Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews."
The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.