Kanhai S Amin, Melissa A Davis, Amir Naderi, Howard P Forman
{"title":"Increasing patient viewership of complex imaging reports: The paradox of the Cures Act.","authors":"Kanhai S Amin, Melissa A Davis, Amir Naderi, Howard P Forman","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a result of the 21st Century Cures Act, radiology reports are immediately released to patients. We determine if readers of radiology reports, via electronic health records (EHRs), and radiology report complexity have changed post the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was used to analyze 10,000 radiology reports (equal split of CT, mammogram, MRI, X-ray, and ultrasound modalities) per year between 2013 and 2023. Readability was calculated through reading grade level indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient viewership of their radiology reports via EHRs increased from 3.3 % (95 % CI: 3.0 %-3.7 %) in 2013 to 58.2 % (95 % CI: 57.3 %-59.2 %) in 2023. Once the 21st Century Cures Act's Information Blocking Provision went into effect, there was a significant increase in viewing probability with patients having 1.71 times higher odds of viewing their reports (OR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.32, p < 0.001). This increase in patient viewership held for all modalities tested except CT (P < 0.01). Despite increased viewership, the reading grade level of radiologist dictated radiology reports was greater than the recommended level for health information across all years and modalities tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients are increasingly engaging with their radiology reports, but reports may be too complex for the typical patient. Solutions will be required to improve patient experience with their radiology reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"119 ","pages":"110398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As a result of the 21st Century Cures Act, radiology reports are immediately released to patients. We determine if readers of radiology reports, via electronic health records (EHRs), and radiology report complexity have changed post the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was used to analyze 10,000 radiology reports (equal split of CT, mammogram, MRI, X-ray, and ultrasound modalities) per year between 2013 and 2023. Readability was calculated through reading grade level indices.
Results: Patient viewership of their radiology reports via EHRs increased from 3.3 % (95 % CI: 3.0 %-3.7 %) in 2013 to 58.2 % (95 % CI: 57.3 %-59.2 %) in 2023. Once the 21st Century Cures Act's Information Blocking Provision went into effect, there was a significant increase in viewing probability with patients having 1.71 times higher odds of viewing their reports (OR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.32, p < 0.001). This increase in patient viewership held for all modalities tested except CT (P < 0.01). Despite increased viewership, the reading grade level of radiologist dictated radiology reports was greater than the recommended level for health information across all years and modalities tested.
Conclusions and relevance: Patients are increasingly engaging with their radiology reports, but reports may be too complex for the typical patient. Solutions will be required to improve patient experience with their radiology reports.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology