Assessing the Utility of a National Conference on Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics as an Educational Tool: A Survey-based Pilot Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Rohan Shankarghatta, Sarika Grover, Julia Bahja, Zeanab Chaer, Rahim Feddag, Can Celik, Felix Karst, James Olding
{"title":"Assessing the Utility of a National Conference on Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics as an Educational Tool: A Survey-based Pilot Study.","authors":"Rohan Shankarghatta, Sarika Grover, Julia Bahja, Zeanab Chaer, Rahim Feddag, Can Celik, Felix Karst, James Olding","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-surgical facial aesthetics (NSFA) is a rapidly growing field involving the use of dermal fillers and botulinum toxin for aesthetic enhancement. The aesthetic injectables market is expanding, attracting interest from individuals seeking NSFA procedures. There has also been marked interest among healthcare professionals (HCPs) aspiring to become aesthetic practitioners. Conferences play a crucial role as educational platforms for HCPs venturing into NSFA. We used a national NSFA conference as an education tool for undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare students, assessing the utility of this conference in imparting knowledge on topics such as training pathways, regulations and complications in NSFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FACExpo conference, held in November 2022, was organized by both qualified and aspiring aesthetic practitioners. Pre- and post-conference questionnaires were administered to attendees to evaluate their interest in facial aesthetics and their knowledge before and after the conference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 delegates responded to the pre-and post-conference questionnaires. There was a statistically significant improvement in awareness of training pathways, regulations, and complications (<i>p</i><0.0001). Only 39.71 percent of delegates were aware of the NSFA regulations before the conference, which increased to 91.18 percent in the post-conference survey. Similarly, 38.24 percent of delegates were confident in their understanding of training pathways pre-conference which increased to 97.10 percent post-conference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that facial aesthetic conferences can be used as an educational tool for aspiring practitioners and highlights the existing knowledge gap among current practitioners. Further research is needed to assess the overall impact of aesthetic conferences on the education of aspiring practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"17 12","pages":"32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Non-surgical facial aesthetics (NSFA) is a rapidly growing field involving the use of dermal fillers and botulinum toxin for aesthetic enhancement. The aesthetic injectables market is expanding, attracting interest from individuals seeking NSFA procedures. There has also been marked interest among healthcare professionals (HCPs) aspiring to become aesthetic practitioners. Conferences play a crucial role as educational platforms for HCPs venturing into NSFA. We used a national NSFA conference as an education tool for undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare students, assessing the utility of this conference in imparting knowledge on topics such as training pathways, regulations and complications in NSFA.

Methods: The FACExpo conference, held in November 2022, was organized by both qualified and aspiring aesthetic practitioners. Pre- and post-conference questionnaires were administered to attendees to evaluate their interest in facial aesthetics and their knowledge before and after the conference.

Results: A total of 68 delegates responded to the pre-and post-conference questionnaires. There was a statistically significant improvement in awareness of training pathways, regulations, and complications (p<0.0001). Only 39.71 percent of delegates were aware of the NSFA regulations before the conference, which increased to 91.18 percent in the post-conference survey. Similarly, 38.24 percent of delegates were confident in their understanding of training pathways pre-conference which increased to 97.10 percent post-conference.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that facial aesthetic conferences can be used as an educational tool for aspiring practitioners and highlights the existing knowledge gap among current practitioners. Further research is needed to assess the overall impact of aesthetic conferences on the education of aspiring practitioners.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊最新文献
Phenotypic Shift during Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis with Ixekizumab. Treatment of Xanthelasma Palpebrarum Using Trichloroacetic Acid 80. Young Psoriatic Patients Respond Faster to Dimethyl Fumarate: Age-related Differences in Efficacy and Adverse Events. Nigella Sativa (Black Cumin) Oil: A Case Report and Analysis Exploring Severe Cutaneous Manifestations and Implications for Patient Care. Assessing the Utility of a National Conference on Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics as an Educational Tool: A Survey-based Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1