Physical performance discriminating winning and losing in UEFA Champions League: a full-season study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2025.139076
Toni Modric, Sime Versic, Igor Jukic, Damir Sekulic
{"title":"Physical performance discriminating winning and losing in UEFA Champions League: a full-season study.","authors":"Toni Modric, Sime Versic, Igor Jukic, Damir Sekulic","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2025.139076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the differences in physical performance when winning and losing in UEFA Champions League (UCL) matches. Data were collected using an optical tracking system from all UCL matches (n = 125) in the 2022/23 season. A linear mixed model was used to examine the differences in physical performance in won and lost matches while controlling for match location, team formation, opponent quality, playing time, red cards, and between-player, -team, and -match variations. The results indicated that (i) wingers and forwards covered ~ 20% greater high-intensity running distance in won compared to lost matches (Cohen's d (d) = 0.76 and 0.96, respectively), (ii) central defenders and fullbacks covered ~ 15% greater high-intensity running distance in lost compared to won matches (d = 0.59 and 0.32, respectively), (iii) offensive midfielders achieved ~ 2% greater low-intensity running distance (d = 0.59) while defensive midfielders performed ~ 2% greater total distance (d = 0.81) in won compared to lost matches. These findings suggest that winning was physically more demanding for offensive players but losing was more demanding for defensive players, while midfield players' physical demands were similar irrespective of winning and losing. Soccer coaches should consider implementing an extended period of recovery for offensive and defensive players following won and lost matches, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":"42 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2025.139076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the differences in physical performance when winning and losing in UEFA Champions League (UCL) matches. Data were collected using an optical tracking system from all UCL matches (n = 125) in the 2022/23 season. A linear mixed model was used to examine the differences in physical performance in won and lost matches while controlling for match location, team formation, opponent quality, playing time, red cards, and between-player, -team, and -match variations. The results indicated that (i) wingers and forwards covered ~ 20% greater high-intensity running distance in won compared to lost matches (Cohen's d (d) = 0.76 and 0.96, respectively), (ii) central defenders and fullbacks covered ~ 15% greater high-intensity running distance in lost compared to won matches (d = 0.59 and 0.32, respectively), (iii) offensive midfielders achieved ~ 2% greater low-intensity running distance (d = 0.59) while defensive midfielders performed ~ 2% greater total distance (d = 0.81) in won compared to lost matches. These findings suggest that winning was physically more demanding for offensive players but losing was more demanding for defensive players, while midfield players' physical demands were similar irrespective of winning and losing. Soccer coaches should consider implementing an extended period of recovery for offensive and defensive players following won and lost matches, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辨别欧洲冠军联赛胜负的体能表现:全赛季研究。
这项研究旨在检验在欧洲冠军联赛(UCL)比赛中输赢时身体表现的差异。使用光学跟踪系统收集2022/23赛季所有UCL比赛(n = 125)的数据。在控制比赛地点、球队组成、对手素质、上场时间、红牌以及球员之间、球队之间和比赛之间的变化的情况下,使用线性混合模型来检查赢球和输球比赛中身体表现的差异。结果表明:(1)边锋和前锋在输球比赛中的高强度跑动距离比输球比赛高出约20% (Cohen’s d (d)分别为0.76和0.96);(2)中卫和边后卫在输球比赛中的高强度跑动距离比输球比赛高出约15% (d = 0.59和0.32);(iii)在输球比赛中,进攻中场的低强度跑动距离(d = 0.59)比输球比赛高出约2%,防守中场的总跑动距离(d = 0.81)比输球比赛高出约2%。这些发现表明,胜利对进攻球员的体能要求更高,而失败对防守球员的体能要求更高,而中场球员的体能要求与输赢无关。足球教练应该考虑让进攻球员和防守球员分别在赢球和输球后延长恢复期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing physical fitness using recreational soccer and basketball: A parallel-controlled 8-week study involving overweight and obese individuals, with consideration of sex-related interactions. Establishing reference values for tensiomyography-derived parameters in soccer players: insights from a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme after strenuous endurance exercise in healthy young men: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Evolution of injury burden in Qatari professional football - 8 season data from the Aspetar Injury and Illness Surveillance Programme. Factors determining sports results in elite national volleyball teams between 2004 and 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1