What Does "Palliative" Mean? Sentiment, Knowledge, and Public Perception Concerning Palliative Care on the Internet since the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0057
Joachim Peters, Maria Heckel, Eva Breindl, Christoph Ostgathe
{"title":"What Does \"Palliative\" Mean? Sentiment, Knowledge, and Public Perception Concerning Palliative Care on the Internet since the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Joachim Peters, Maria Heckel, Eva Breindl, Christoph Ostgathe","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the public perception of palliative care during and after the pandemic. Assuming that analyzing online language data has the potential to collect real-time public opinions, an analysis of large online datasets can be beneficial to guide future policymaking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the public perception of palliative care and palliative care-related misconceptions on the Internet (worldwide) through natural language processing (NLP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using large language model NLP analysis, we identified public attitudes, opinions, sentiment, and misconceptions about palliative care on the Internet, comparing a corpus of English-language web texts and X-posts (\"tweets\") (02/2020-02/2022) with similar samples before (02/2018-02/2020) and after the pandemic (03/2022-02/2024).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study is a statistical analysis of website and social media data, conducted on six large language corpora.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, palliative care situations are more often portrayed as frightening, uncertain, and stressful, misconceptions about the activities and aims of palliative care occur on average 44% more frequently, especially on the social media platform X.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public discussion on social media continues to persist even in 2024. Insights from online NLP analysis helped to determine the image of palliative care in the Internet discourse and can help find ways to react to certain trends such as the spread of negative attitudes and misconceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"512-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the public perception of palliative care during and after the pandemic. Assuming that analyzing online language data has the potential to collect real-time public opinions, an analysis of large online datasets can be beneficial to guide future policymaking.

Objectives: To identify long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the public perception of palliative care and palliative care-related misconceptions on the Internet (worldwide) through natural language processing (NLP).

Design: Using large language model NLP analysis, we identified public attitudes, opinions, sentiment, and misconceptions about palliative care on the Internet, comparing a corpus of English-language web texts and X-posts ("tweets") (02/2020-02/2022) with similar samples before (02/2018-02/2020) and after the pandemic (03/2022-02/2024).

Setting: The study is a statistical analysis of website and social media data, conducted on six large language corpora.

Results: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, palliative care situations are more often portrayed as frightening, uncertain, and stressful, misconceptions about the activities and aims of palliative care occur on average 44% more frequently, especially on the social media platform X.

Conclusions: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public discussion on social media continues to persist even in 2024. Insights from online NLP analysis helped to determine the image of palliative care in the Internet discourse and can help find ways to react to certain trends such as the spread of negative attitudes and misconceptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“缓和”是什么意思?COVID-19大流行以来互联网上关于姑息治疗的情绪、知识和公众认知
背景:在大流行期间和之后,公众对姑息治疗的看法知之甚少。假设分析在线语言数据具有收集实时民意的潜力,那么对大型在线数据集的分析可能有助于指导未来的政策制定。目的:通过自然语言处理(NLP),确定COVID-19大流行对公众对姑息治疗的认知和互联网上与姑息治疗相关的误解的长期影响。设计:使用大型语言模型NLP分析,我们确定了互联网上公众对姑息治疗的态度、观点、情绪和误解,将英语网络文本和x -post(“tweet”)语料库(2020年2月2日- 2022年2月)与大流行之前(2018年2月- 2020年2月)和之后(2022年3月- 2024年2月)的类似样本进行比较。背景:本研究是对网站和社交媒体数据的统计分析,在六个大型语言语料库上进行。结果:自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,姑息治疗情况更多地被描述为令人恐惧、不确定和有压力的,对姑息治疗活动和目标的误解平均增加了44%,尤其是在社交媒体平台x上。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行对社交媒体上公众讨论的影响即使在2024年也会持续存在。来自在线NLP分析的见解有助于确定互联网话语中姑息治疗的形象,并有助于找到应对某些趋势的方法,例如负面态度和误解的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Availability of, Barriers to Performing, and Educational Practices of Interventional Procedures for Refractory Pain in Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey of Designated Cancer Hospitals in Japan. Using Contemplative Medicine to Harness Compassion in the Palliative Care Setting: Lessons Learned. What Does "Palliative" Mean? Sentiment, Knowledge, and Public Perception Concerning Palliative Care on the Internet since the COVID-19 Pandemic. Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1