[Screening in Cystic Fibrosis in the Chilean population. Pilot project for screening in newborns].

María Lina Boza Costagliola, Gabriel Lobo Sotomayor, Susana Valdebenito Alcaino, Sandra Navarro Tapia, Hortensia Barrientos Ibañez, Nicolas Johnson Garcia, Carmen Berrios Duran, Viviana Ortega Balbi
{"title":"[Screening in Cystic Fibrosis in the Chilean population. Pilot project for screening in newborns].","authors":"María Lina Boza Costagliola, Gabriel Lobo Sotomayor, Susana Valdebenito Alcaino, Sandra Navarro Tapia, Hortensia Barrientos Ibañez, Nicolas Johnson Garcia, Carmen Berrios Duran, Viviana Ortega Balbi","doi":"10.32641/andespediatr.v95i5.5124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal screening has been implemented internationally with different protocols and has become the routine method in the preclinical stage. Late diagnosis is associated with more severe symptoms with decreased survival and higher treatment costs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the incidence of cystic fibrosis; to evaluate the performance of the screening algorithms Immunoreactive Trypsinogen and Pancreatitis-Associated Protein (IRT/PAP) and the IRTxPAP product; to analyze the cut-off value for IRT, PAP, and IRTxPAP, and to establish a methodology for its ongoing evaluation; finally, to evaluate the quality of IRT and PAP measurements.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>a neonatal screening protocol was implemented using the IRT/PAP assays plus IRTXPAP product in a 7-year pilot study. Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 371,724 heel dried blood spot samples were collected in maternity and neonatology units from the public healthcare network in 17 hospitals in the Metropolitan Region (RM) and 15 in the Valparaíso Region (RV). 277,245 newborns met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>with IRT/PAP plus IRT x PAP the incidence was 1/7,109 NB. The cut-off value and percentiles were established for IRT, PAP, IRT x PAP. The best sensitivity and specificity obtained by ROC analysis gave an IRT value of 48,142 ng/mL (98.8th percentile), PAP of 1.68 ug/L and IRT x PAP of 140ug2/L. The performance of the IRT/PAP detection algorithms, the IRT x PAP product, and the quality of measurements were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results allow us to report that the IRT/PAP plus IRTxPAP protocol can be implemented in Chile, complying with international guidelines, with adequate government funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":72196,"journal":{"name":"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria","volume":"95 5","pages":"543-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andes pediatrica : revista Chilena de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v95i5.5124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal screening has been implemented internationally with different protocols and has become the routine method in the preclinical stage. Late diagnosis is associated with more severe symptoms with decreased survival and higher treatment costs.

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of cystic fibrosis; to evaluate the performance of the screening algorithms Immunoreactive Trypsinogen and Pancreatitis-Associated Protein (IRT/PAP) and the IRTxPAP product; to analyze the cut-off value for IRT, PAP, and IRTxPAP, and to establish a methodology for its ongoing evaluation; finally, to evaluate the quality of IRT and PAP measurements.

Patients and method: a neonatal screening protocol was implemented using the IRT/PAP assays plus IRTXPAP product in a 7-year pilot study. Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 371,724 heel dried blood spot samples were collected in maternity and neonatology units from the public healthcare network in 17 hospitals in the Metropolitan Region (RM) and 15 in the Valparaíso Region (RV). 277,245 newborns met the inclusion criteria.

Results: with IRT/PAP plus IRT x PAP the incidence was 1/7,109 NB. The cut-off value and percentiles were established for IRT, PAP, IRT x PAP. The best sensitivity and specificity obtained by ROC analysis gave an IRT value of 48,142 ng/mL (98.8th percentile), PAP of 1.68 ug/L and IRT x PAP of 140ug2/L. The performance of the IRT/PAP detection algorithms, the IRT x PAP product, and the quality of measurements were evaluated.

Conclusion: The results allow us to report that the IRT/PAP plus IRTxPAP protocol can be implemented in Chile, complying with international guidelines, with adequate government funding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[智利人群囊性纤维化筛查。]新生儿筛查试点项目]。
新生儿筛查已在国际上以不同的方案实施,并已成为临床前阶段的常规方法。晚期诊断与更严重的症状、更低的生存率和更高的治疗费用相关。目的:估计囊性纤维化的发生率;评估免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原和胰腺炎相关蛋白(IRT/PAP)和IRTxPAP产品筛选算法的性能;分析IRT、PAP和IRTxPAP的临界值,并为其持续评估建立方法;最后,评估IRT和PAP测量的质量。患者和方法:在一项为期7年的试点研究中,采用IRT/PAP检测和IRTXPAP产品实施新生儿筛查方案。2015年至2021年期间,从首都地区(RM)的17家医院和Valparaíso地区(RV)的15家医院的公共医疗保健网络的产科和新生儿病房共收集了371,724份足跟干血斑样本。277245名新生儿符合纳入标准。结果:IRT/PAP + IRT x PAP的发生率为1/7,109 NB。建立IRT、PAP、IRT x PAP的临界值和百分位数。ROC分析获得的最佳灵敏度和特异性为IRT值为48,142 ng/mL (98.8%), PAP为1.68 ug/L, IRT × PAP为140ug2/L。评估IRT/PAP检测算法的性能、IRT x PAP产品和测量质量。结论:结果使我们能够报告IRT/PAP加IRTxPAP方案可以在智利实施,符合国际准则,有足够的政府资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Adrenal tumors in pediatric patients treated with minimally invasive surgery]. [Beyond premature apnea pauses: congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1]. [Can CPAP prevent the progression of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome? A decade of experience in a Reference Center]. [Discovering a diverse gender in adolescence: revelation of being. Exploratory study]. [Positional plagiocephaly and neurodevelopment: a narrative review].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1