Biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on two types of commercial dermal scaffolds: An in vitro study.

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry Pub Date : 2024-08-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/japid.2024.015
Omid Moghaddas, Ehsan Seyedjafari, Donya Sadat Mahoutchi
{"title":"Biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on two types of commercial dermal scaffolds: An in vitro study.","authors":"Omid Moghaddas, Ehsan Seyedjafari, Donya Sadat Mahoutchi","doi":"10.34172/japid.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been introduced as an alternative to autogenous grafts. This study assessed the biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on two types of commercial ADM scaffolds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present in vitro study investigated the behavior of MSCs cultured on scaffold type I CenoDerm® (Tissue Regeneration Corporation) and type II Acellular Dermis (Iranian Tissue Product Co.) as the test groups and an empty well plate as the control group (n=78). Cell attachment was assessed after 12 hours of incubation using 6,4-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and methyl thiazole tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Cell proliferation was assessed using the MTT assay at 24- and 84-hour and 7-day intervals. Cell morphology was also assessed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 24 hours. MTT assay and DAPI staining were repeated for five samples in all the three groups. Mann-Whitney, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DAPI staining and MTT assay showed similar results concerning cell attachment between all the groups at 12 hours (<i>P</i>=0.4). At 24 hours, cell proliferation was significantly higher in scaffold groups (<i>P</i><0.001). At seven days, the lowest cell proliferation was noted in the scaffold II group, with a significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i>=0.01). At 24 hours, cell expansion was greater in the control group, followed by the scaffold I group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both scaffolds were similar in MSC attachment, but scaffold I appeared superior to scaffold II in terms of MSC proliferation and morphology in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"16 2","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been introduced as an alternative to autogenous grafts. This study assessed the biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on two types of commercial ADM scaffolds.

Methods: The present in vitro study investigated the behavior of MSCs cultured on scaffold type I CenoDerm® (Tissue Regeneration Corporation) and type II Acellular Dermis (Iranian Tissue Product Co.) as the test groups and an empty well plate as the control group (n=78). Cell attachment was assessed after 12 hours of incubation using 6,4-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and methyl thiazole tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Cell proliferation was assessed using the MTT assay at 24- and 84-hour and 7-day intervals. Cell morphology was also assessed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 24 hours. MTT assay and DAPI staining were repeated for five samples in all the three groups. Mann-Whitney, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The DAPI staining and MTT assay showed similar results concerning cell attachment between all the groups at 12 hours (P=0.4). At 24 hours, cell proliferation was significantly higher in scaffold groups (P<0.001). At seven days, the lowest cell proliferation was noted in the scaffold II group, with a significant difference between the groups (P=0.01). At 24 hours, cell expansion was greater in the control group, followed by the scaffold I group.

Conclusion: Both scaffolds were similar in MSC attachment, but scaffold I appeared superior to scaffold II in terms of MSC proliferation and morphology in vitro.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间充质干细胞在两种商业真皮支架上的生物学行为:体外研究。
背景:脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)已被引入作为自体移植物的替代选择。本研究评估了间充质干细胞(MSCs)在两种商用ADM支架上的生物学行为。方法:采用体外培养法,以支架I型CenoDerm®(Tissue Regeneration Corporation)和II型脱细胞真皮(Acellular Dermis,伊朗组织产品公司)为实验组,空孔板为对照组(n=78)。孵育12小时后,采用6,4-二氨基-2-苯基吲哚(DAPI)染色和甲基噻唑四唑(MTT)法评估细胞附着。采用MTT法,每隔24小时、84小时和7天评估细胞增殖情况。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察24小时细胞形态。三组各5个样品重复MTT测定和DAPI染色。采用Mann-Whitney、ANOVA和post hoc Tukey检验进行统计分析。结果:DAPI染色和MTT法在12 h各组间细胞附着情况相似(P=0.4)。24h时,支架组细胞增殖明显增高(PP=0.01)。24h时,对照组细胞扩增量最大,支架I组次之。结论:两种支架的间充质干细胞附着相似,但支架I在体外培养的间充质干细胞增殖和形态上优于支架II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond probes and charts: The AI revolution reshaping diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decision-making in periodontology. A critical review of existing peri-implantitis classification systems and a novel three-dimensional framework. Evaluation of salivary cortisol levels in peri-implant diseases: An analytical observational study. Full-mouth rehabilitation with implant-supported overdentures in a heavy smoker with multiple sclerosis: A 3-year follow-up case report. A modified anchored suturing technique for enhanced flap stability in periodontal plastic surgery: A case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1