Is Routine Discharge Enough? Needs and Perceptions Regarding Discharge and Readmission of Palliative Care Patients and Caregivers.

Aaron A Kuntz, Victoria H Chen, Leena Ambady, Benjamin Osher, Catherine DesRoches
{"title":"Is Routine Discharge Enough? Needs and Perceptions Regarding Discharge and Readmission of Palliative Care Patients and Caregivers.","authors":"Aaron A Kuntz, Victoria H Chen, Leena Ambady, Benjamin Osher, Catherine DesRoches","doi":"10.1177/10499091241311222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The hospital discharge process is fraught for patients with serious illness and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to understand palliative care patient and caregiver concerns regarding the patient-centeredness of the hospital discharge process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 patients receiving palliative care and 4 caregivers. Caregivers were interviewed with patient or alone, for a total of 13 interviews. Interviews were focused on the patient-centeredness of the discharge process, completeness of discharge education, and readmission. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach with open coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: (i) symptoms, (ii) relationship to illness, (iii) variance in patient-provider alignment, and (iv) discharge readiness, including readmission. Physical and non-physical symptoms were common, though non-pain symptoms were more frequently concerns. Illness understanding and empowerment by the discharge process were low, with participants seeking more information. Alignment varied by provider with closer relationships with bedside nurses and outpatient providers, especially oncologists, than inpatient providers. Readmission was not perceived to be avoidable but was associated with symptom burden. Discharge readiness was mixed; common concerns included lack of clarity regarding next steps and post-discharge services. Up to 40% of participants reported incomplete education on given topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our qualitative study of patients and caregivers receiving palliative care identified unmet needs in the discharge process: non-pain symptom burden, gaps in empowerment and illness understanding, and mixed discharge readiness. Relationship to care informs subsequent engagement with care and medical decision-making. Future interventions should focus on strengthening patient and caregiver empowerment and illness understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241311222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241311222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The hospital discharge process is fraught for patients with serious illness and their caregivers.

Objectives: We sought to understand palliative care patient and caregiver concerns regarding the patient-centeredness of the hospital discharge process.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 patients receiving palliative care and 4 caregivers. Caregivers were interviewed with patient or alone, for a total of 13 interviews. Interviews were focused on the patient-centeredness of the discharge process, completeness of discharge education, and readmission. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive approach with open coding.

Results: We identified four themes: (i) symptoms, (ii) relationship to illness, (iii) variance in patient-provider alignment, and (iv) discharge readiness, including readmission. Physical and non-physical symptoms were common, though non-pain symptoms were more frequently concerns. Illness understanding and empowerment by the discharge process were low, with participants seeking more information. Alignment varied by provider with closer relationships with bedside nurses and outpatient providers, especially oncologists, than inpatient providers. Readmission was not perceived to be avoidable but was associated with symptom burden. Discharge readiness was mixed; common concerns included lack of clarity regarding next steps and post-discharge services. Up to 40% of participants reported incomplete education on given topics.

Conclusion: Our qualitative study of patients and caregivers receiving palliative care identified unmet needs in the discharge process: non-pain symptom burden, gaps in empowerment and illness understanding, and mixed discharge readiness. Relationship to care informs subsequent engagement with care and medical decision-making. Future interventions should focus on strengthening patient and caregiver empowerment and illness understanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规出院就够了吗?关于姑息治疗患者和护理人员出院和再入院的需求和看法。
背景:医院的出院过程是充满了严重疾病的患者和他们的护理人员。目的:我们试图了解姑息治疗患者和护理人员对出院过程中以患者为中心的关注。方法:对11例姑息治疗患者和4名护理人员进行半结构化访谈。护理人员与患者或单独访谈,共13次访谈。访谈的重点是出院过程中以患者为中心、出院教育的完整性和再入院情况。使用开放编码的归纳方法分析转录本。结果:我们确定了四个主题:(i)症状,(ii)与疾病的关系,(iii)患者-提供者一致性的差异,以及(iv)出院准备情况,包括再入院。身体和非身体症状很常见,尽管非疼痛症状更常见。出院过程中对疾病的理解和授权较低,参与者寻求更多信息。与住院医生相比,与床边护士和门诊医生(尤其是肿瘤科医生)关系更密切的医生的一致性各不相同。再入院被认为是不可避免的,但与症状负担有关。退役准备情况好坏参半;共同的关切包括对下一步行动和出院后服务缺乏明确性。多达40%的参与者报告说,在给定的主题上没有得到充分的教育。结论:我们对接受姑息治疗的患者和护理人员的定性研究确定了出院过程中未满足的需求:非疼痛症状负担,赋权和疾病理解的差距,以及混合出院准备。与护理的关系为后续参与护理和医疗决策提供信息。未来的干预措施应侧重于加强患者和护理人员的能力以及对疾病的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End of Life Outcomes Following Comfort Care Orders: A Single Center Experience. Trends, Sociodemographic and Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Palliative Care Utilization Among Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients. Beyond the Diagnosis: A Deep Dive Into the End Stage Liver Disease Experience From the Patient Perspective. End-Of-Life Symptoms and Symptom Management in Older Adults With Stroke Versus Cancer. Truth on ProQOL and Burnout Assessment-Development and Intercultural Validation of the Brief ProQOL-12 from the Professional Quality of Life, Version 5.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1