Jonah M. Dimnik , Kurt H. Wilde , W. Brent Edwards
{"title":"Optimization of the density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones","authors":"Jonah M. Dimnik , Kurt H. Wilde , W. Brent Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rabbit is a popular experimental model in orthopaedic biomechanics due to the presence of natural Haversian remodeling, allowing for better translational relevance to the mechanobiology of human bone over traditional rodent models. Although rabbits are often used with computational modeling approaches such as the finite element (FE) method, a validated and widely agreed upon density–elasticity relationship, which is required to make subject-specific predictions, does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine and validate an accurate density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones using mathematical optimization. Fourteen tibiae and thirteen femora were harvested from New Zealand White Rabbits, imaged with computed tomography (CT), and cyclically loaded in uniaxial compression while strain gauge rosette data were recorded. The CT images were processed into subject-specific FE models which were used in a Nelder–Mead optimization routine to determine a density–elasticity relationship that minimized the error between experimentally measured and FE-predicted principal strains. Optimizations were performed for the tibiae and femora independently, and for both bones combined. A subset of 4 tibiae and 4 femora that were excluded from the optimization were then used to validate the derived relationships. All equations that were determined by the initial optimization exhibited a <span><math><mrow><mi>Y</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>X</mi></mrow></math></span> type of relationship with strong correlations (Tibiae: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>96</mn></mrow></math></span>; Femora: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>85</mn></mrow></math></span>; Combined: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>90</mn></mrow></math></span>) and good agreement. The validation groups yielded similar results with strong correlations (Tibiae: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>94</mn></mrow></math></span>; Femora: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>87</mn></mrow></math></span>; Combined: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>91</mn></mrow></math></span>). These findings suggest that any of the derived density–elasticity relationships are suitable for computational modeling of the rabbit hindlimb and that a single relationship could be used for the whole rabbit hindlimb in studies where greater computational efficiency is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124005149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rabbit is a popular experimental model in orthopaedic biomechanics due to the presence of natural Haversian remodeling, allowing for better translational relevance to the mechanobiology of human bone over traditional rodent models. Although rabbits are often used with computational modeling approaches such as the finite element (FE) method, a validated and widely agreed upon density–elasticity relationship, which is required to make subject-specific predictions, does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine and validate an accurate density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones using mathematical optimization. Fourteen tibiae and thirteen femora were harvested from New Zealand White Rabbits, imaged with computed tomography (CT), and cyclically loaded in uniaxial compression while strain gauge rosette data were recorded. The CT images were processed into subject-specific FE models which were used in a Nelder–Mead optimization routine to determine a density–elasticity relationship that minimized the error between experimentally measured and FE-predicted principal strains. Optimizations were performed for the tibiae and femora independently, and for both bones combined. A subset of 4 tibiae and 4 femora that were excluded from the optimization were then used to validate the derived relationships. All equations that were determined by the initial optimization exhibited a type of relationship with strong correlations (Tibiae: ; Femora: ; Combined: ) and good agreement. The validation groups yielded similar results with strong correlations (Tibiae: ; Femora: ; Combined: ). These findings suggest that any of the derived density–elasticity relationships are suitable for computational modeling of the rabbit hindlimb and that a single relationship could be used for the whole rabbit hindlimb in studies where greater computational efficiency is necessary.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.