Breast Biopsy Notification Preferences and Health Literacy.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol17.21709
Manon Fisher, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Patty L Tenofsky
{"title":"Breast Biopsy Notification Preferences and Health Literacy.","authors":"Manon Fisher, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Patty L Tenofsky","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol17.21709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Communication of breast biopsy results varies and does not always meet patient expectations. This study aimed to determine how patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer preferred to receive their biopsy results, including preferences for communication methods, the type of medical professional delivering the results, and wait time. Additionally, we evaluated how health literacy might affect these preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English-speaking female patients who had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer were surveyed at a breast surgery clinic in Wichita, Kansas. The survey included the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS), questions on how they received their biopsy results, and their preferences for receiving results. Participants were classified as having adequate or inadequate literacy based on their BHLS responses and a scoring system from previous research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 101 participants. Overall, 64% preferred in-person communication, 40% preferred to hear from their primary care physician, 36% from their surgeon, and 56% wanted results within 24 hours. There was no statistically significant difference in preferences based on health literacy, including communication method (p = 0.44), type of medical professional (p = 0.56), and wait time (p = 0.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants preferred to receive biopsy results indicating a breast cancer diagnosis in-person, regardless of their health literacy. While it may be sufficient to call a patient with benign biopsy results, it is recommended to offer an in-person discussion for cancer diagnoses, respecting the patient's preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"17 5","pages":"96-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol17.21709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Communication of breast biopsy results varies and does not always meet patient expectations. This study aimed to determine how patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer preferred to receive their biopsy results, including preferences for communication methods, the type of medical professional delivering the results, and wait time. Additionally, we evaluated how health literacy might affect these preferences.

Methods: English-speaking female patients who had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer were surveyed at a breast surgery clinic in Wichita, Kansas. The survey included the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS), questions on how they received their biopsy results, and their preferences for receiving results. Participants were classified as having adequate or inadequate literacy based on their BHLS responses and a scoring system from previous research.

Results: The study included 101 participants. Overall, 64% preferred in-person communication, 40% preferred to hear from their primary care physician, 36% from their surgeon, and 56% wanted results within 24 hours. There was no statistically significant difference in preferences based on health literacy, including communication method (p = 0.44), type of medical professional (p = 0.56), and wait time (p = 0.38).

Conclusions: Most participants preferred to receive biopsy results indicating a breast cancer diagnosis in-person, regardless of their health literacy. While it may be sufficient to call a patient with benign biopsy results, it is recommended to offer an in-person discussion for cancer diagnoses, respecting the patient's preference.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺活检通知偏好与健康素养。
乳腺活检结果的交流各不相同,并不总是符合患者的期望。本研究旨在确定先前诊断为乳腺癌的患者如何接受活检结果,包括对沟通方法的偏好、提供结果的医疗专业人员类型和等待时间。此外,我们评估了健康素养如何影响这些偏好。方法:在堪萨斯州威奇托市的一家乳房外科诊所对曾被诊断为乳腺癌的英语女性患者进行调查。该调查包括简短的健康素养筛查(BHLS),他们如何收到活检结果的问题,以及他们接受结果的偏好。根据他们的BHLS反应和先前研究的评分系统,参与者被划分为读写能力充足或不足。结果:该研究包括101名参与者。总的来说,64%的人更喜欢面对面的沟通,40%的人更喜欢从他们的初级保健医生那里听到,36%的人更喜欢从他们的外科医生那里听到,56%的人希望在24小时内得到结果。基于健康素养的偏好差异无统计学意义,包括沟通方式(p = 0.44)、医疗专业人员类型(p = 0.56)和等待时间(p = 0.38)。结论:大多数参与者更愿意接受活检结果表明乳腺癌的诊断,无论他们的健康素养如何。虽然称患者活检结果为良性可能就足够了,但建议在尊重患者偏好的情况下,与患者进行面对面的癌症诊断讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of a Mediastinal Granuloma Related to Histoplasmosis with Streptococcus dysgalactiae Subspecies equisimilis Superinfection Resulting in Abscess and Subsequent Pericarditis in a Pediatric Patient. A Diagnosis of Trichoblastic Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry. Acute Border Zone Infarcts in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome. Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Iliopsoas Corticosteriod Injection for Hip Pain. Descriptive Evaluation in Outpatient Follow-Up of Direct LDL-C in Patients with Elevated Triglycerides and Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1