Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is prevalent but not associated with mortality in patients with septic shock

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07748-2
Philippe Vignon, Cyril Charron, Annick Legras, Frédérique Musset, Michel Slama, Gwenaël Prat, Stein Silva, David Vandroux, Grégoire Müller, Bruno Levy, Florence Boissier, Bruno Evrard, Marine Goudelin, Stéfan Mankikian, Mai-Anh NAY, Julien Jabot, Béatrice Riu, Pierre Bailly, Julien Maizel, Julie Léger, Antoine Vieillard-Baron
{"title":"Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is prevalent but not associated with mortality in patients with septic shock","authors":"Philippe Vignon, Cyril Charron, Annick Legras, Frédérique Musset, Michel Slama, Gwenaël Prat, Stein Silva, David Vandroux, Grégoire Müller, Bruno Levy, Florence Boissier, Bruno Evrard, Marine Goudelin, Stéfan Mankikian, Mai-Anh NAY, Julien Jabot, Béatrice Riu, Pierre Bailly, Julien Maizel, Julie Léger, Antoine Vieillard-Baron","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07748-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in septic shock patients has not been determined using current diagnostic guidelines. We assessed the relation between LVDD during the first 3 days following intensive care unit (ICU) admission for septic shock and Day-28 mortality.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolled 402 patients (age: 63 ± 13 year; 59% male; SAPS II: 59 ± 20; SOFA: 9.4 ± 3.6; mechanical ventilation: 74%) with septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition). Patients were echocardiographically assessed within 12 h after admission (Day 1), on Day 2, Day 3, at ICU and at hospital discharge (or Day 28 whichever occurred first), using 2016 American-European guidelines.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>LVDD was present at least once between Day 1 and 3 in 304 patients (76%), and in 56% and 44% of patients at ICU discharge and on Day 28 (or hospital discharge), respectively (43% of patients with follow-up). Seventy-eight of 172 patients (45%) exhibited similar LV diastolic properties throughout the study period while 58 patients (34%) improved their LVDD at follow-up (lower grade: n = 9, regression: n = 49). Day-28 mortality was not statistically different between patients with and without LVDD (80/304 [26%] vs. 25/88 [28%]; OR: 0.900 [0.530–1.527]; p = 0.696). Similar results were obtained when adjusting the multivariate model on SAPSII or SOFA score on admission, together with fluid balance during the first three days of ICU stay (OR: 0.838 [0.471–1.491]: p = 0.547 and OR: 0.887 [0.513–1.534]: p = 0.668, respectively).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>LVDD was highly prevalent in patients with septic shock but not associated with mortality. It appeared improving in one-third of survivors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>PRODIASYS study registered on ClinicalTrials (September 27, 2016, number NCT02918214).</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07748-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in septic shock patients has not been determined using current diagnostic guidelines. We assessed the relation between LVDD during the first 3 days following intensive care unit (ICU) admission for septic shock and Day-28 mortality.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolled 402 patients (age: 63 ± 13 year; 59% male; SAPS II: 59 ± 20; SOFA: 9.4 ± 3.6; mechanical ventilation: 74%) with septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition). Patients were echocardiographically assessed within 12 h after admission (Day 1), on Day 2, Day 3, at ICU and at hospital discharge (or Day 28 whichever occurred first), using 2016 American-European guidelines.

Results

LVDD was present at least once between Day 1 and 3 in 304 patients (76%), and in 56% and 44% of patients at ICU discharge and on Day 28 (or hospital discharge), respectively (43% of patients with follow-up). Seventy-eight of 172 patients (45%) exhibited similar LV diastolic properties throughout the study period while 58 patients (34%) improved their LVDD at follow-up (lower grade: n = 9, regression: n = 49). Day-28 mortality was not statistically different between patients with and without LVDD (80/304 [26%] vs. 25/88 [28%]; OR: 0.900 [0.530–1.527]; p = 0.696). Similar results were obtained when adjusting the multivariate model on SAPSII or SOFA score on admission, together with fluid balance during the first three days of ICU stay (OR: 0.838 [0.471–1.491]: p = 0.547 and OR: 0.887 [0.513–1.534]: p = 0.668, respectively).

Conclusion

LVDD was highly prevalent in patients with septic shock but not associated with mortality. It appeared improving in one-third of survivors.

Trial registration

PRODIASYS study registered on ClinicalTrials (September 27, 2016, number NCT02918214).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左心室舒张功能不全在感染性休克患者中很普遍,但与死亡率无关
目的:目前的诊断指南尚未确定感染性休克患者左室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)对预后的影响。我们评估了感染性休克入住重症监护病房(ICU)后3天LVDD与第28天死亡率之间的关系。方法本前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究纳入402例患者(年龄:63±13岁;男性59%;sap ii: 59±20;沙发:9.4±3.6;机械通气:74%)合并脓毒症休克(脓毒症-3定义)。患者在入院后12小时(第1天)、第2天、第3天、在ICU和出院时(或第28天,以先发生者为准)进行超声心动图评估,采用2016年欧美指南。结果304例患者(76%)在第1天至第3天至少出现一次slvdd,在ICU出院和第28天(或出院)分别有56%和44%的患者(43%的随访患者)出现slvdd。172例患者中78例(45%)在整个研究期间表现出相似的左室舒张特性,58例(34%)患者在随访中LVDD改善(低级别:n = 9,回归:n = 49)。LVDD患者与非LVDD患者的第28天死亡率无统计学差异(80/304 [26%]vs. 25/88 [28%];或:0.900 [0.530-1.527];p = 0.696)。在调整入院时SAPSII评分或SOFA评分及ICU前3 d液体平衡的多变量模型时,结果相似(or: 0.838 [0.471-1.491]: p = 0.547; or: 0.887 [0.513-1.534]: p = 0.668)。结论感染性休克患者lvdd发生率高,但与死亡率无关。三分之一的幸存者似乎有所改善。prodiasys研究已在ClinicalTrials注册(2016年9月27日,编号NCT02918214)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
期刊最新文献
Supporting the bereaved child in the adult ICU: a narrative review A checklist for environmentally responsible research within the ICU Modernizing autopsy practices in the ICU to advance critical care diagnostics Correction: Position paper on the physiology and nomenclature of dual circulation during venoarterial ECMO in adults B-ICONIC vs. reality: the feasibility gap in neuro-ultrasound recommendations and achievability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1