Cost-Effectiveness of a Polypill for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in an Underserved Population

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JAMA cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4812
Ciaran N. Kohli-Lynch, Andrew E. Moran, Dhruv S. Kazi, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Neil Jordan, Dustin French, Yiyi Zhang, Thomas J. Wang, Brandon K. Bellows
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of a Polypill for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in an Underserved Population","authors":"Ciaran N. Kohli-Lynch, Andrew E. Moran, Dhruv S. Kazi, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Neil Jordan, Dustin French, Yiyi Zhang, Thomas J. Wang, Brandon K. Bellows","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceThe Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) Polypill Trial showed that a cardiovascular polypill (a single pill containing a statin and 3 half-standard dose antihypertensive medications) effectively controls cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in a majority Black race and low-income population. The cost-effectiveness of polypill treatment in this population has not been previously studied.ObjectiveTo determine the cost-effectiveness of the cardiovascular polypill.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA discrete-event simulation version of the well-established CVD policy model simulated clinical and economic outcomes of the SCCS Polypill Trial from a health care sector perspective. A time horizon of 10 years was adopted. Polypill treatment was priced at $463 per year in the base-case analysis. Model input data were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, pooled longitudinal cohort studies, the SCCS Polypill Trial, and published literature. Two cohorts were analyzed: an SCCS Polypill Trial–representative cohort of 100 000 individuals and all trial-eligible non-Hispanic Black US adults. Study parameters and model inputs were varied extensively in 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.ExposuresPolypill treatment or usual care.Main Outcome and MeasuresPrimary outcomes were direct health care costs (US dollar 2023) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), both discounted 3% annually, and the incremental cost per QALY gained.ResultsIn the trial-representative cohort of 100 000 individuals (mean [SD] age, 56.9 [5.9] years; 61 807 female [61.8%]), polypill treatment was projected to yield a mean of 1190 (95% uncertainty interval, 287-2159) additional QALYs compared with usual care, at a cost of approximately $10 152 000. Hence, polypill treatment was estimated to cost $8560 per QALY gained compared with usual care and was high value (<$50 000 per QALY gained) in 99% of simulations. Polypill treatment was estimated to be high value when priced at $559 or less per year and cost saving when priced at $443 or less per year. In almost all sensitivity analyses, polypill treatment remained high value. In a secondary analysis of 3 602 427 trial-eligible non-Hispanic Black US adults (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [7.6] years; 2 006 597 female [55.7%]), polypill treatment was high value, with an estimated cost of $13 400 per QALY gained.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this economic evaluation suggest that polypill treatment could be a high value intervention for a low-income, majority Black population with limited access to health care services. It could additionally reduce health disparities.","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4812","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceThe Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) Polypill Trial showed that a cardiovascular polypill (a single pill containing a statin and 3 half-standard dose antihypertensive medications) effectively controls cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in a majority Black race and low-income population. The cost-effectiveness of polypill treatment in this population has not been previously studied.ObjectiveTo determine the cost-effectiveness of the cardiovascular polypill.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA discrete-event simulation version of the well-established CVD policy model simulated clinical and economic outcomes of the SCCS Polypill Trial from a health care sector perspective. A time horizon of 10 years was adopted. Polypill treatment was priced at $463 per year in the base-case analysis. Model input data were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, pooled longitudinal cohort studies, the SCCS Polypill Trial, and published literature. Two cohorts were analyzed: an SCCS Polypill Trial–representative cohort of 100 000 individuals and all trial-eligible non-Hispanic Black US adults. Study parameters and model inputs were varied extensively in 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.ExposuresPolypill treatment or usual care.Main Outcome and MeasuresPrimary outcomes were direct health care costs (US dollar 2023) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), both discounted 3% annually, and the incremental cost per QALY gained.ResultsIn the trial-representative cohort of 100 000 individuals (mean [SD] age, 56.9 [5.9] years; 61 807 female [61.8%]), polypill treatment was projected to yield a mean of 1190 (95% uncertainty interval, 287-2159) additional QALYs compared with usual care, at a cost of approximately $10 152 000. Hence, polypill treatment was estimated to cost $8560 per QALY gained compared with usual care and was high value (<$50 000 per QALY gained) in 99% of simulations. Polypill treatment was estimated to be high value when priced at $559 or less per year and cost saving when priced at $443 or less per year. In almost all sensitivity analyses, polypill treatment remained high value. In a secondary analysis of 3 602 427 trial-eligible non-Hispanic Black US adults (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [7.6] years; 2 006 597 female [55.7%]), polypill treatment was high value, with an estimated cost of $13 400 per QALY gained.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this economic evaluation suggest that polypill treatment could be a high value intervention for a low-income, majority Black population with limited access to health care services. It could additionally reduce health disparities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在服务不足人群中预防心血管疾病的一种复方药片的成本效益
南方社区队列研究(SCCS)多药片试验表明,一种心血管多药片(一种含有他汀类药物和3种半标准剂量降压药的单片)有效地控制了大多数黑人和低收入人群心血管疾病(CVD)的危险因素。在这一人群中,复方药片治疗的成本效益以前没有研究过。目的探讨心血管复方丸剂的成本-效果。设计、设置和参与者建立的心血管疾病政策模型的离散事件模拟版本从卫生保健部门的角度模拟了SCCS多药片试验的临床和经济结果。采用了10年的时间期限。在基本病例分析中,复方药片治疗的价格为每年463美元。模型输入数据来源于国家健康和营养检查调查、医疗支出小组调查、汇总纵向队列研究、SCCS多药片试验和已发表的文献。对两个队列进行了分析:一个SCCS Polypill试验的10万人代表队列和所有符合试验条件的非西班牙裔美国黑人成年人。在单向和概率敏感性分析中,研究参数和模型输入变化很大。暴露:多利匹治疗或常规护理。主要结局和测量方法主要结局是直接医疗保健成本(2023美元)和质量调整生命年(QALYs),均为每年3%的折扣率,以及每个QALY获得的增量成本。结果在100,000个体的试验代表性队列中(平均[SD]年龄56.9[5.9]岁;61,807名女性[61.8%]),与常规护理相比,预计复方制剂治疗平均可产生1190个(95%不确定区间,287-2159)额外的质量年,费用约为10 152 000美元。因此,与常规护理相比,多药片治疗估计每获得一个质量aly花费8560美元,并且在99%的模拟中是高价值的(每获得一个质量aly 50,000美元)。据估计,在每年559美元或更低的价格下,多药片治疗是高价值的,而在每年443美元或更低的价格下,多药片治疗是节省成本的。在几乎所有的敏感性分析中,多药片治疗仍然是高价值的。在一项对3602427名符合试验条件的非西班牙裔美国黑人成人的二次分析中(平均[SD]年龄55.4[7.6]岁;(2 006 597名女性[55.7%]),复方丸剂治疗价值高,每个QALY的估计成本为13 400美元。结论和相关性本经济评价的结果表明,对于获得医疗保健服务有限的低收入多数黑人人群,多药片治疗可能是一种高价值的干预措施。它还可以减少健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
期刊最新文献
Treatment Strategies to Control Blood Pressure in People With Hypertension in Tanzania and Lesotho Default Bulk Ordering and Text Messaging to Enhance Outreach for Lipid Screening Blood Pressure Control-Many Paths, 1 Goal. Yellowish Nodules on a Man Consuming a Carnivore Diet. Clinical Phenotype and Prognosis of Asymptomatic Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Infiltration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1