The Impact of Dating Twin Pregnancy by the Larger, Smaller or Mean Twin Crown-Rump Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.18065
Gillian V. Blayney, Veronica Giorgione, Amar Bhide, Basky Thilaganathan
{"title":"The Impact of Dating Twin Pregnancy by the Larger, Smaller or Mean Twin Crown-Rump Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Gillian V. Blayney,&nbsp;Veronica Giorgione,&nbsp;Amar Bhide,&nbsp;Basky Thilaganathan","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact of twin dating by ultrasound-measured crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger (CRL-L), smaller (CRL-S) or mean twin measurement (CRL-M) on the rates of preterm birth (PTB) and detection of small for gestational age (SGA) births.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>A tertiary fetal medicine centre (London, UK).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population or Sample</h3>\n \n <p>All twin pregnancies between 1998 and 2023 who underwent first trimester CRL ultrasound assessment and fetal growth assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data collection included CRL measurement, estimated fetal weight (EFW), pregnancy outcome and birthweight (BW) for each twin. Pregnancies were retrospectively re-dated by CRL-S, CRL-L and CRL-M.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>SGA &lt; 10th centile and extreme PTB rates (&lt; 28 weeks).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the 1129 twin pregnancies, median CRL-S was 61 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.0–66.0) and CRL-L was 63 mm (IQR: 58.4–68.9) with a mean discordance of 4.0%. Prenatal SGA diagnosis occurred in 19.8% and 23.1% of smaller twins when dated by CRL-S and CRL-L, respectively. When pregnancies were dated by CRL-M versus CRL-S or CRL-L, there was no difference in prenatal SGA diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.275 and <i>p</i> = 0.419); SGA at birth (<i>p</i> = 0.132 and <i>p</i> = 0.325); or extreme PTB (<i>p</i> = &gt; 0.999 and <i>p</i> = 0.765 respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dating by the smaller, larger or mean twin CRL does not significantly alter rates of extreme preterm birth, SGA detection or SGA birth. Dating by the mean twin CRL reduces stigmatisation of the smaller twin and retains the utility of accurate gestational age assessment without impacting clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 5","pages":"648-655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of twin dating by ultrasound-measured crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger (CRL-L), smaller (CRL-S) or mean twin measurement (CRL-M) on the rates of preterm birth (PTB) and detection of small for gestational age (SGA) births.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A tertiary fetal medicine centre (London, UK).

Population or Sample

All twin pregnancies between 1998 and 2023 who underwent first trimester CRL ultrasound assessment and fetal growth assessment.

Methods

Data collection included CRL measurement, estimated fetal weight (EFW), pregnancy outcome and birthweight (BW) for each twin. Pregnancies were retrospectively re-dated by CRL-S, CRL-L and CRL-M.

Main Outcome Measures

SGA < 10th centile and extreme PTB rates (< 28 weeks).

Results

In the 1129 twin pregnancies, median CRL-S was 61 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 56.0–66.0) and CRL-L was 63 mm (IQR: 58.4–68.9) with a mean discordance of 4.0%. Prenatal SGA diagnosis occurred in 19.8% and 23.1% of smaller twins when dated by CRL-S and CRL-L, respectively. When pregnancies were dated by CRL-M versus CRL-S or CRL-L, there was no difference in prenatal SGA diagnosis (p = 0.275 and p = 0.419); SGA at birth (p = 0.132 and p = 0.325); or extreme PTB (p = > 0.999 and p = 0.765 respectively).

Conclusions

Dating by the smaller, larger or mean twin CRL does not significantly alter rates of extreme preterm birth, SGA detection or SGA birth. Dating by the mean twin CRL reduces stigmatisation of the smaller twin and retains the utility of accurate gestational age assessment without impacting clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大、小或平均双胞胎冠臀长度对双胞胎怀孕的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:评价超声测量较大(CRL- l)、较小(CRL- s)或平均双胞胎测量(CRL- m)的冠臀长度(CRL)对早产(PTB)率和小胎龄(SGA)出生检出率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Pain Relief in Procedures Related to Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Author Reply. Bereavement Care Experiences of Mothers Following Stillbirth and Neonatal Death: A Latent Class Analysis. Author Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1