Efficient maximum iterations for swarm intelligence algorithms: a comparative study

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s10462-024-11104-7
Shen Si-Ma, Han-Ming Liu, Hong-Xiang Zhan, Zhao-Fa Liu, Gang Guo, Cong Yu, Peng-Cheng Hu
{"title":"Efficient maximum iterations for swarm intelligence algorithms: a comparative study","authors":"Shen Si-Ma,&nbsp;Han-Ming Liu,&nbsp;Hong-Xiang Zhan,&nbsp;Zhao-Fa Liu,&nbsp;Gang Guo,&nbsp;Cong Yu,&nbsp;Peng-Cheng Hu","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-11104-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A swarm intelligence algorithm usually iterates many times to approximate the optimum to obtain the solution of a problem. The maximum iteration is influenced by many factors such as the algorithm itself, problem types, as well as dimensions and search space sizes of decision variables. There are few existing studies on efficient maximum iterations, especially a large-scale study on comparison for different problem types. By dividing three CEC benchmark sets into several problem types, this study made a large-scale performance comparison of 123 common swarm intelligence algorithms from several views. The experimental results show that for low-dimensionality, wide search space, and/or simple- and medium-complex problems, about a quarter of the algorithms are concentrated in iterations of about 30 ~ 80, while most algorithms for other types of problems tend to have as many iterations as possible. By and large, for the Classical set, large iterations are beneficial for improving the performance of most algorithms, while less than half of the algorithms for CEC 2019 and CEC 2022 do so. And, the efficient iterations of excellent algorithms are about 300 on low dimensionality, wide search space and simple-complexity problems, while other types are as large as possible. In terms of algorithm speed, LSO, DE and RSA are the fastest on all the three benchmark sets, and the runtime of all algorithms is almost linearly related to the maximum iterations. Although the conclusions largely depend on the problem types, we believe that an efficient iteration is necessary to optimize algorithm performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11104-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11104-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A swarm intelligence algorithm usually iterates many times to approximate the optimum to obtain the solution of a problem. The maximum iteration is influenced by many factors such as the algorithm itself, problem types, as well as dimensions and search space sizes of decision variables. There are few existing studies on efficient maximum iterations, especially a large-scale study on comparison for different problem types. By dividing three CEC benchmark sets into several problem types, this study made a large-scale performance comparison of 123 common swarm intelligence algorithms from several views. The experimental results show that for low-dimensionality, wide search space, and/or simple- and medium-complex problems, about a quarter of the algorithms are concentrated in iterations of about 30 ~ 80, while most algorithms for other types of problems tend to have as many iterations as possible. By and large, for the Classical set, large iterations are beneficial for improving the performance of most algorithms, while less than half of the algorithms for CEC 2019 and CEC 2022 do so. And, the efficient iterations of excellent algorithms are about 300 on low dimensionality, wide search space and simple-complexity problems, while other types are as large as possible. In terms of algorithm speed, LSO, DE and RSA are the fastest on all the three benchmark sets, and the runtime of all algorithms is almost linearly related to the maximum iterations. Although the conclusions largely depend on the problem types, we believe that an efficient iteration is necessary to optimize algorithm performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群智能算法的高效最大迭代:比较研究
群体智能算法通常通过多次迭代来逼近问题的最优解。最大迭代次数受算法本身、问题类型、决策变量的维数和搜索空间大小等诸多因素的影响。关于有效最大迭代的研究很少,特别是对不同问题类型的比较的大规模研究。本研究通过将三个CEC基准集划分为几个问题类型,从多个角度对123种常见的群体智能算法进行了大规模的性能比较。实验结果表明,对于低维、宽搜索空间和/或简单和中等复杂的问题,大约四分之一的算法集中在30 ~ 80次的迭代上,而大多数其他类型问题的算法则倾向于尽可能多的迭代。总的来说,对于经典集,大迭代有利于提高大多数算法的性能,而CEC 2019和CEC 2022的算法中只有不到一半的算法这样做。在低维、宽搜索空间和简单复杂问题上,优秀算法的有效迭代数在300次左右,而其他类型的算法则尽可能地大。在算法速度方面,LSO、DE和RSA在所有三个基准集上都是最快的,并且所有算法的运行时间几乎与最大迭代次数线性相关。虽然结论在很大程度上取决于问题类型,但我们认为有效的迭代是优化算法性能所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating large language models effectiveness for flow-based intrusion detection: a comparative study with ML and DL baselines Synergizing blockchain and AI to fortify IoT security: a comprehensive review Multi-objective genetic programming-based algorithmic trading, using directional changes and a modified sharpe ratio score for identifying optimal trading strategies Multi-agent generalized cooperative optimization scheduling for multi-energy complementarity in microgrids Emerging computational intelligence based techniques for lung cancer diagnosis and classification on chest CT scan images: a comprehensive survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1