qPCR as a Tool for the Diagnosis of Visceral and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY Acta Parasitologica Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s11686-024-00942-8
José Bryan Rihs, Mariana Teixeira Vilela, Janete Soares Coelho dos Santos, Job Alves de Souza Filho, Sérgio Caldas, Rodrigo Souza Leite, Marcos Paulo Gomes Mol
{"title":"qPCR as a Tool for the Diagnosis of Visceral and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"José Bryan Rihs,&nbsp;Mariana Teixeira Vilela,&nbsp;Janete Soares Coelho dos Santos,&nbsp;Job Alves de Souza Filho,&nbsp;Sérgio Caldas,&nbsp;Rodrigo Souza Leite,&nbsp;Marcos Paulo Gomes Mol","doi":"10.1007/s11686-024-00942-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ensuring accuracy in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis is crucial due to the myriad of potential differential diagnoses. Given the inherent limitations of serological techniques, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) emerges as a superior alternative. Furthermore, parasitological methods, conventionally regarded as the gold standard owing to their high specificity, encounter challenges concerning sensitivity and invasiveness for patients. In this context, the present study aims to assess, via meta-analysis, the performance of qPCR in diagnosing visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>This meta-analysis encompassed studies published between January 2011 and December 2022, sourced from six databases (PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Scielo, EMBASE, and Web of Science), utilizing the keywords “qPCR,” “molecular diagnosis,” and “leishmaniasis.” Epidemiological studies focusing on the efficacy of qPCR for leishmaniasis diagnosis were included. Data such as study demographics, geographic locations, sampling techniques, and the number of positive qPCR results were aggregated and analyzed to derive overall positivity rates, sensitivity, and specificity values associated with qPCR. Heterogeneity analysis was conducted on the data to select appropriate models, and the collective efficacy data of qPCR were illustrated in forest plots.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-four studies met all inclusion criteria. The positivity rates for human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis were 27.07% (95% CI: 17.81-36.33%) and 60.40% (95% CI: 30.23-90.57%), respectively. In cases of visceral leishmaniasis in dogs, cats, and wild animals, the positivity rates were 26.55% (95% CI: 21.40-31.70%), 0.92% (95% CI: 0.09-1.75%), and 28.98% (95% CI: 21.86-35.10%), respectively. Analysis of the selected studies revealed high overall sensitivity and specificity values achieved with qPCR, at 91.08% (95% CI: 81.77-100.39%) and 98.08% (95% CI: 97.13-99.03%), respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study indicates that qPCR is a highly sensitive and specific tool, adequately suitable for the diagnosis of human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis, as well as visceral leishmaniasis in animals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6932,"journal":{"name":"Acta Parasitologica","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Parasitologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11686-024-00942-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ensuring accuracy in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis is crucial due to the myriad of potential differential diagnoses. Given the inherent limitations of serological techniques, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) emerges as a superior alternative. Furthermore, parasitological methods, conventionally regarded as the gold standard owing to their high specificity, encounter challenges concerning sensitivity and invasiveness for patients. In this context, the present study aims to assess, via meta-analysis, the performance of qPCR in diagnosing visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Method

This meta-analysis encompassed studies published between January 2011 and December 2022, sourced from six databases (PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Scielo, EMBASE, and Web of Science), utilizing the keywords “qPCR,” “molecular diagnosis,” and “leishmaniasis.” Epidemiological studies focusing on the efficacy of qPCR for leishmaniasis diagnosis were included. Data such as study demographics, geographic locations, sampling techniques, and the number of positive qPCR results were aggregated and analyzed to derive overall positivity rates, sensitivity, and specificity values associated with qPCR. Heterogeneity analysis was conducted on the data to select appropriate models, and the collective efficacy data of qPCR were illustrated in forest plots.

Results

Fifty-four studies met all inclusion criteria. The positivity rates for human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis were 27.07% (95% CI: 17.81-36.33%) and 60.40% (95% CI: 30.23-90.57%), respectively. In cases of visceral leishmaniasis in dogs, cats, and wild animals, the positivity rates were 26.55% (95% CI: 21.40-31.70%), 0.92% (95% CI: 0.09-1.75%), and 28.98% (95% CI: 21.86-35.10%), respectively. Analysis of the selected studies revealed high overall sensitivity and specificity values achieved with qPCR, at 91.08% (95% CI: 81.77-100.39%) and 98.08% (95% CI: 97.13-99.03%), respectively.

Conclusion

This study indicates that qPCR is a highly sensitive and specific tool, adequately suitable for the diagnosis of human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis, as well as visceral leishmaniasis in animals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
qPCR作为内脏和皮肤利什曼病的诊断工具:系统回顾和荟萃分析
由于各种潜在的鉴别诊断,确保利什曼病诊断的准确性至关重要。鉴于血清学技术的固有局限性,实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)作为一种优越的替代方案出现。此外,寄生虫学方法由于其高特异性而传统上被视为金标准,但在患者的敏感性和侵入性方面面临挑战。在此背景下,本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估qPCR在诊断内脏和皮肤利什曼病中的表现。方法本荟萃分析包括2011年1月至2022年12月期间发表的研究,来自六个数据库(PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Scielo, EMBASE和Web of Science),使用关键词“qPCR”,“分子诊断”和“利什曼病”。包括关注qPCR诊断利什曼病疗效的流行病学研究。汇总和分析研究人口统计学、地理位置、采样技术和qPCR阳性结果数量等数据,得出与qPCR相关的总体阳性率、敏感性和特异性值。对数据进行异质性分析,选择合适的模型,并对森林样地的qPCR集体功效数据进行说明。结果54项研究符合全部纳入标准。人内脏利什曼病和皮肤利什曼病阳性率分别为27.07% (95% CI: 17.81 ~ 36.33%)和60.40% (95% CI: 30.23 ~ 90.57%)。犬、猫和野生动物内脏利什曼病的阳性率分别为26.55% (95% CI: 21.40 ~ 31.70%)、0.92% (95% CI: 0.09 ~ 1.75%)和28.98% (95% CI: 21.86 ~ 35.10%)。对所选研究的分析显示,qPCR获得了较高的总体灵敏度和特异性值,分别为91.08% (95% CI: 81.77-100.39%)和98.08% (95% CI: 97.13-99.03%)。结论qPCR是一种灵敏度高、特异性强的检测工具,适用于人内脏利什曼病、皮肤利什曼病以及动物内脏利什曼病的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Parasitologica
Acta Parasitologica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Parasitologica is an international journal covering the latest advances in the subject. Acta Parasitologica publishes original papers on all aspects of parasitology and host-parasite relationships, including the latest discoveries in biochemical and molecular biology of parasites, their physiology, morphology, taxonomy and ecology, as well as original research papers on immunology, pathology, and epidemiology of parasitic diseases in the context of medical, veterinary and biological sciences. The journal also publishes short research notes, invited review articles, book reviews. The journal was founded in 1953 as "Acta Parasitologica Polonica" by the Polish Parasitological Society and since 1954 has been published by W. Stefanski Institute of Parasitology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw. Since 1992 in has appeared as Acta Parasitologica in four issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Parasite Communities of Paralonchurus Brasiliensis (Sciaenidae) in Southeastern Brazil Across a Two-Decade Interval Assessing Soil-transmitted Helminth Infections and Drug Compliance in Water Sanitation and Hygiene Communities, Ogun State, Nigeria n-Butanol Fraction of Dioscorea dumetorum Tuber Aqueous Extract Exhibited Potent Antimalarial Activity in Plasmodium berghei-infected Mice Synovial Parasitosis and Inflammatory Biomarker Profiles in Osteoarthritis: Associations with Host and Therapeutic Factors Comparing the Interactions of Trichomonas vaginalis/gallinae Legumain-Like Cysteine Protease 1 (LEGU-1) and Human Legumain (LGMN) Protein Sequences with Proton Pump Inhibitor Drugs (Lansoprazole, Omeprazole, and Esomeprazole) by Bioinformatics Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1