Risk of colorectal cancer associated with frequency of colorectal polyp diagnosis in relatives

IF 25.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.030
Yuqing Hu, Elham Kharazmi, Qunfeng Liang, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Sundquist, Mahdi Fallah
{"title":"Risk of colorectal cancer associated with frequency of colorectal polyp diagnosis in relatives","authors":"Yuqing Hu, Elham Kharazmi, Qunfeng Liang, Kristina Sundquist, Jan Sundquist, Mahdi Fallah","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3>We aimed to evaluate the association of frequency of polyp diagnosis in relatives with the risk of overall and early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC).<h3>Methods</h3>We leveraged data from nationwide Swedish family cancer datasets (1964-2018) to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for individuals with a family history of polyp by frequency of polyp diagnosis in family members.<h3>Results</h3>We followed up 11,676,043 individuals for up to 54 years. Compared with the risk in individuals without a family history of colorectal tumor (N=142,234), the risk of overall CRC was 1.4-fold in those with 1 FDR with one-time polyp diagnosis [95%CI=1.3-1.4, N=11,035; early-onset SIR: 1.4 (1.3-1.5), N=742]. The risk was significantly higher in individuals with 1 FDR with ≥2 times (frequent) polyp diagnoses [overall CRC: 1.8 (1.8-1.9); early-onset CRC=2.3 (2.0-2.6)]. A rather similar risk was observed for individuals with ≥2 FDRs with one-time polyp diagnosis [overall CRC: 1.9 (1.7-2.1); early-onset CRC: 2.2 (1.5-2.9)]. Individuals with ≥2 FDRs with frequent polyp diagnoses had a 2.4-fold overall risk (2.2-2.7) and a 3.9-fold early-onset risk (2.8-5.3). Younger age at polyp diagnosis in FDRs was associated with an increased risk of CRC. A family history of polyp in second-degree relatives was important only when there were frequent diagnoses of polyp.<h3>Conclusions</h3>A higher frequency of colorectal polyp diagnosis in relatives is associated with a greater risk of CRC, especially early-onset CRC. This risk is independent of number of affected relatives or youngest age at polyp diagnosis. These findings underscore the need for more personalized CRC screening strategies that are tailored to individuals with a family history of polyp.","PeriodicalId":12590,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.12.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

We aimed to evaluate the association of frequency of polyp diagnosis in relatives with the risk of overall and early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

We leveraged data from nationwide Swedish family cancer datasets (1964-2018) to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for individuals with a family history of polyp by frequency of polyp diagnosis in family members.

Results

We followed up 11,676,043 individuals for up to 54 years. Compared with the risk in individuals without a family history of colorectal tumor (N=142,234), the risk of overall CRC was 1.4-fold in those with 1 FDR with one-time polyp diagnosis [95%CI=1.3-1.4, N=11,035; early-onset SIR: 1.4 (1.3-1.5), N=742]. The risk was significantly higher in individuals with 1 FDR with ≥2 times (frequent) polyp diagnoses [overall CRC: 1.8 (1.8-1.9); early-onset CRC=2.3 (2.0-2.6)]. A rather similar risk was observed for individuals with ≥2 FDRs with one-time polyp diagnosis [overall CRC: 1.9 (1.7-2.1); early-onset CRC: 2.2 (1.5-2.9)]. Individuals with ≥2 FDRs with frequent polyp diagnoses had a 2.4-fold overall risk (2.2-2.7) and a 3.9-fold early-onset risk (2.8-5.3). Younger age at polyp diagnosis in FDRs was associated with an increased risk of CRC. A family history of polyp in second-degree relatives was important only when there were frequent diagnoses of polyp.

Conclusions

A higher frequency of colorectal polyp diagnosis in relatives is associated with a greater risk of CRC, especially early-onset CRC. This risk is independent of number of affected relatives or youngest age at polyp diagnosis. These findings underscore the need for more personalized CRC screening strategies that are tailored to individuals with a family history of polyp.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌风险与亲属结直肠息肉诊断频率相关
背景,目的:我们旨在评估亲属息肉诊断频率与整体和早发性结直肠癌(CRC)风险的关系。方法利用瑞典全国家庭癌症数据集(1964-2018)的数据,根据家庭成员中息肉诊断频率计算有息肉家族史个体的标准化发病率(SIRs)。结果我们对11,676,043人进行了长达54年的随访。与无结直肠肿瘤家族史的个体(N=142,234)相比,1次FDR并一次性诊断为息肉的患者发生总结直肠癌的风险为1.4倍[95%CI=1.3-1.4, N= 11035;早发性SIR: 1.4 (1.3 ~ 1.5), N=742]。1次FDR且息肉诊断次数≥2次(频繁)的个体的风险明显更高[总CRC: 1.8 (1.8-1.9);早发性CRC=2.3(2.0-2.6)]。对于fdr≥2且诊断为一次性息肉的个体,观察到相当相似的风险[总CRC: 1.9 (1.7-2.1);早发性CRC: 2.2(1.5-2.9)]。fdr≥2例且息肉诊断频繁的个体总风险为2.4倍(2.2-2.7),早发风险为3.9倍(2.8-5.3)。fdr中诊断为息肉的年龄越小,结直肠癌的风险越高。只有当息肉的诊断频繁时,二级亲属中是否有息肉家族史才显得重要。结论亲属结直肠息肉诊断率越高,发生CRC的风险越大,尤其是早发性CRC。这种风险与患病亲属的数量或息肉诊断时的最小年龄无关。这些发现强调需要针对有息肉家族史的个体制定更个性化的CRC筛查策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
4366
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology is the most prominent journal in the field of gastrointestinal disease. It is the flagship journal of the American Gastroenterological Association and delivers authoritative coverage of clinical, translational, and basic studies of all aspects of the digestive system, including the liver and pancreas, as well as nutrition. Some regular features of Gastroenterology include original research studies by leading authorities, comprehensive reviews and perspectives on important topics in adult and pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal also includes features such as editorials, correspondence, and commentaries, as well as special sections like "Mentoring, Education and Training Corner," "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in GI," "Gastro Digest," "Gastro Curbside Consult," and "Gastro Grand Rounds." Gastroenterology also provides digital media materials such as videos and "GI Rapid Reel" animations. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, Embase, Nutrition Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, PubMed/Medline, and the Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Takefuji POEM Progress and Unresolved Issues: A Decade of Expert Insights Comments on biologic ranking methodology used by the network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 ulcerative colitis guideline Burden and social determinants of health in pediatric IBD: Lessons learned from epidemiologic studies using health administrative data Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Subtyping: Addressing Limitations of L1-Penalized Estimation in Alternative Splicing Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1