Prolonged Ovarian Stimulation Does Not Worsen Neonatal Outcomes After Fresh Embryo Transfers

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.18062
Jing Wu, Ying Ju, Jie Dong, Hengde Zhang, Xifeng Xiao, Xiaohong Wang
{"title":"Prolonged Ovarian Stimulation Does Not Worsen Neonatal Outcomes After Fresh Embryo Transfers","authors":"Jing Wu,&nbsp;Ying Ju,&nbsp;Jie Dong,&nbsp;Hengde Zhang,&nbsp;Xifeng Xiao,&nbsp;Xiaohong Wang","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the relationship between prolonged ovarian stimulation and neonatal outcomes after autologous fresh embryo transfer (fET).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University-affiliated centres.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>3529 patients underwent autologous in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles between August 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022, with a live singleton birth after fET.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between prolonged ovarian stimulation and neonatal outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate independent effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Neonatal outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Multivariate regression showed no significant association between simulation duration and birthweight (adjusted <i>β</i>: 4.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −13.86 to 22.23; <i>p</i> = 0.6494) or gestational age (GA) (adjusted <i>β</i>: −0.01, 95% [CI]: −0.09 to 0.06; <i>p</i> = 0.7403) Categorical analysis of neonatal outcomes, including low birthweight (LBW) (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.94, 95% [CI]: 0.70 to 1.25; <i>p</i> = 0.6501), macrosomia (adjusted OR: 0.95, 95% [CI]: 0.78 to 1.16; <i>p</i> = 0.6294), small for gestational age (SGA) (adjusted OR: 0.95, 95% [CI]: 0.75 to 1.19; <i>p</i> = 0.6465), large for gestational age (LGA) (adjusted OR: 1.02, 95% [CI]: 0.85 to 1.21; <i>p</i> = 0.8542) and preterm (adjusted OR: 0.93, 95% [CI]: 0.77 to 1.11; <i>p</i> = 0.4191), revealed no associations with stimulation duration. PSM analysis confirmed these findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Prolonged ovarian stimulation does not appear to increase adverse neonatal outcomes in singleton newborns after autologous fET.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between prolonged ovarian stimulation and neonatal outcomes after autologous fresh embryo transfer (fET).

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting

University-affiliated centres.

Population

3529 patients underwent autologous in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles between August 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022, with a live singleton birth after fET.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between prolonged ovarian stimulation and neonatal outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate independent effects.

Main Outcome Measures

Neonatal outcomes.

Results

Multivariate regression showed no significant association between simulation duration and birthweight (adjusted β: 4.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −13.86 to 22.23; p = 0.6494) or gestational age (GA) (adjusted β: −0.01, 95% [CI]: −0.09 to 0.06; p = 0.7403) Categorical analysis of neonatal outcomes, including low birthweight (LBW) (adjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.94, 95% [CI]: 0.70 to 1.25; p = 0.6501), macrosomia (adjusted OR: 0.95, 95% [CI]: 0.78 to 1.16; p = 0.6294), small for gestational age (SGA) (adjusted OR: 0.95, 95% [CI]: 0.75 to 1.19; p = 0.6465), large for gestational age (LGA) (adjusted OR: 1.02, 95% [CI]: 0.85 to 1.21; p = 0.8542) and preterm (adjusted OR: 0.93, 95% [CI]: 0.77 to 1.11; p = 0.4191), revealed no associations with stimulation duration. PSM analysis confirmed these findings.

Conclusions

Prolonged ovarian stimulation does not appear to increase adverse neonatal outcomes in singleton newborns after autologous fET.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延长卵巢刺激不会使新鲜胚胎移植后新生儿结局恶化
探讨自体新鲜胚胎移植(fET)后卵巢刺激时间延长与新生儿结局的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Chemicals in menstrual products: Highlighting the need for further research into the effects of chemical exposure. Predicting platinum resistance and poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Menopausal hormonal therapy and cardiovascular health. Author Reply. Author Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1