Development of the set of resource use items to capture costs related to informal care for people with Rare Dementia for RD‐TALK

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.092682
Katherine Cullen, Emilie V Brotherhood, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Joshua Stott
{"title":"Development of the set of resource use items to capture costs related to informal care for people with Rare Dementia for RD‐TALK","authors":"Katherine Cullen, Emilie V Brotherhood, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Joshua Stott","doi":"10.1002/alz.092682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundNon‐memory‐led dementias pose additional challenges to ‘typical dementias’ including unusual symptoms and younger onset leading to particularly high neuropsychiatric comorbidities. As part of the economic evaluation supporting the RD‐talk research programme, we require the collection of participant level resource use associated with the intervention compared with usual care. The resource use measure (RUM) needs to be sufficiently comprehensive, but still focused to capture the key items of interest (e.g., main drivers of resource use and associated cost) to balance the trade‐off between precision, effort, and burden to research participant.MethodInitial discussion with carers of people with non‐memory‐led dementia and clinical experts informed a draft list of resource items to design a RUM. A modified Delphi survey was carried out with informal carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Consensus of each item, using pre‐defined levels to keep or remove items, was summarised using descriptive statistics and percentage agreement. Inter‐rater reliability between rounds was assessed using the intra‐class correlation coefficient; the stability of the raters’ responses was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultFor round one, 18 participants were recruited (11 HCPs, 9 carers), 14 participants remained for round two (7 HCPs, 7 carers). For primary/community care, general practitioner appointments, psychological interventions (such as talking therapy), and rare dementia support groups or direct calls were all highly rated by both HCPs and carers. The RUM should include time taken off work or taking early retirement due to caring for someone with rare dementia. Categories of caring tasks were listed, from personal care and physical help, to helping with paperwork, financial matters, dealing with care services and benefits, and managing challenging behaviour. All categories were highly rated by HCPs and carers.ConclusionResource use measures are mainly designed for the person with a disease or condition and focus on health and social care use. There can be a considerable burden on informal carers when someone is diagnosed with rare dementia, and it is important to capture key resource items in addition to health and social care relevant to this population when evaluating interventions in rare dementia management.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092682","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNon‐memory‐led dementias pose additional challenges to ‘typical dementias’ including unusual symptoms and younger onset leading to particularly high neuropsychiatric comorbidities. As part of the economic evaluation supporting the RD‐talk research programme, we require the collection of participant level resource use associated with the intervention compared with usual care. The resource use measure (RUM) needs to be sufficiently comprehensive, but still focused to capture the key items of interest (e.g., main drivers of resource use and associated cost) to balance the trade‐off between precision, effort, and burden to research participant.MethodInitial discussion with carers of people with non‐memory‐led dementia and clinical experts informed a draft list of resource items to design a RUM. A modified Delphi survey was carried out with informal carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Consensus of each item, using pre‐defined levels to keep or remove items, was summarised using descriptive statistics and percentage agreement. Inter‐rater reliability between rounds was assessed using the intra‐class correlation coefficient; the stability of the raters’ responses was assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultFor round one, 18 participants were recruited (11 HCPs, 9 carers), 14 participants remained for round two (7 HCPs, 7 carers). For primary/community care, general practitioner appointments, psychological interventions (such as talking therapy), and rare dementia support groups or direct calls were all highly rated by both HCPs and carers. The RUM should include time taken off work or taking early retirement due to caring for someone with rare dementia. Categories of caring tasks were listed, from personal care and physical help, to helping with paperwork, financial matters, dealing with care services and benefits, and managing challenging behaviour. All categories were highly rated by HCPs and carers.ConclusionResource use measures are mainly designed for the person with a disease or condition and focus on health and social care use. There can be a considerable burden on informal carers when someone is diagnosed with rare dementia, and it is important to capture key resource items in addition to health and social care relevant to this population when evaluating interventions in rare dementia management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为RD‐TALK开发一套资源使用项目,以记录与罕见痴呆症患者非正式护理相关的成本
背景:非记忆性痴呆对“典型痴呆”构成了额外的挑战,包括不寻常的症状和年轻的发病,导致特别高的神经精神合并症。作为支持RD‐talk研究计划的经济评估的一部分,我们需要收集与常规护理相比,与干预相关的参与者水平的资源使用情况。资源使用度量(RUM)需要足够全面,但仍然集中于捕获感兴趣的关键项目(例如,资源使用和相关成本的主要驱动因素),以平衡精确度、努力和研究参与者负担之间的权衡。方法:与非记忆性痴呆患者的护理人员和临床专家进行初步讨论,提供一份资源项目清单草案,以设计一份RUM。对非正式护理人员和卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)进行了修改后的德尔菲调查。每个项目的共识,使用预先定义的水平来保留或删除项目,使用描述性统计和百分比协议进行总结。采用类内相关系数评估轮次间的秩间信度;用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估评分者反应的稳定性。结果第一轮招募了18名参与者(11名医护人员,9名护理人员),第二轮招募了14名参与者(7名医护人员,7名护理人员)。对于初级/社区护理,全科医生预约、心理干预(如谈话治疗)和罕见的痴呆症支持小组或直接电话都得到了hcp和护理人员的高度评价。RUM应包括因照顾患有罕见痴呆症的人而请假或提前退休的时间。列出了照顾任务的类别,从个人照顾和身体帮助,到帮助处理文书工作、财务问题、处理照顾服务和福利,以及管理有挑战性的行为。所有类别都得到了医护人员和护理人员的高度评价。结论资源利用措施主要针对有疾病或状况的人,侧重于健康和社会保健的使用。当有人被诊断患有罕见痴呆症时,非正式护理人员可能会有相当大的负担,在评估罕见痴呆症管理干预措施时,除了与这一人群相关的健康和社会护理外,还必须捕获关键资源项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
AAIC Satellite Symposium slated for May 14 to 15 in Lima, Peru A multi-cohort study of longitudinal and cross-sectional Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults Malnutrition exacerbating neuropsychiatric symptoms on the Alzheimer's continuum is relevant to the cAMP signaling pathway: Human and mouse studies Compositional brain scores capture Alzheimer's disease–specific structural brain patterns along the disease continuum A neuropathology case report of a woman with Down syndrome who remained cognitively stable: Implications for resilience to neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1