Impact of Suture Materials on Surgical Site Infection in Oral Oncological Surgery With Free-Flap Reconstruction: Analysis Using Propensity Scores.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004191
Takeaki Hidaka, Shimpei Miyamoto, Kiichi Furuse, Yutaka Fukunaga, Azusa Oshima, Takeshi Shinozaki, Kazuto Matsuura, Masashi Wakabayashi, Takuya Higashino
{"title":"Impact of Suture Materials on Surgical Site Infection in Oral Oncological Surgery With Free-Flap Reconstruction: Analysis Using Propensity Scores.","authors":"Takeaki Hidaka, Shimpei Miyamoto, Kiichi Furuse, Yutaka Fukunaga, Azusa Oshima, Takeshi Shinozaki, Kazuto Matsuura, Masashi Wakabayashi, Takuya Higashino","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The impact of suture materials on surgical site infections (SSIs) has been well documented in various surgical fields; however, it has not been thoroughly examined in oral oncological surgery with free-flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of oral SSIs associated with the use of monofilament and braided sutures for flap fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent oral oncological resection with free-flap reconstruction was conducted between May 2020 and April 2024. Either monofilament (4-0 PDS® II or Monodiox®) or braided (3-0 Vicryl®) suture was used for flap suturing. The primary outcome was the incidence of oral SSIs, defined according to the guidelines of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores were used to estimate the risk differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 209 eligible patients, 58 experienced oral SSIs, resulting in an incidence of 27.8%. Monofilament sutures were used in 174 patients and braided sutures in 35. The incidence of oral SSIs was higher in the braided suture group (42.9%) than in the monofilament suture group (24.7%). Analysis using propensity scores revealed a significantly higher risk of oral SSIs associated with braided sutures than with monofilament sutures, with a 18.5% risk difference (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-34.9%; P = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Braided sutures may pose an increased risk of SSIs in oral oncological surgeries with free-flap reconstructions. Monofilament sutures are recommended for reconstructions, especially of the floor of the mouth.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The impact of suture materials on surgical site infections (SSIs) has been well documented in various surgical fields; however, it has not been thoroughly examined in oral oncological surgery with free-flap reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of oral SSIs associated with the use of monofilament and braided sutures for flap fixation.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent oral oncological resection with free-flap reconstruction was conducted between May 2020 and April 2024. Either monofilament (4-0 PDS® II or Monodiox®) or braided (3-0 Vicryl®) suture was used for flap suturing. The primary outcome was the incidence of oral SSIs, defined according to the guidelines of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores were used to estimate the risk differences.

Results: Of 209 eligible patients, 58 experienced oral SSIs, resulting in an incidence of 27.8%. Monofilament sutures were used in 174 patients and braided sutures in 35. The incidence of oral SSIs was higher in the braided suture group (42.9%) than in the monofilament suture group (24.7%). Analysis using propensity scores revealed a significantly higher risk of oral SSIs associated with braided sutures than with monofilament sutures, with a 18.5% risk difference (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-34.9%; P = 0.027).

Conclusions: Braided sutures may pose an increased risk of SSIs in oral oncological surgeries with free-flap reconstructions. Monofilament sutures are recommended for reconstructions, especially of the floor of the mouth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔肿瘤游离皮瓣重建手术中缝合材料对手术部位感染的影响:使用倾向评分分析。
目的:缝合材料对手术部位感染(ssi)的影响已经在各个外科领域得到了充分的记录;然而,在口腔肿瘤手术中自由皮瓣重建尚未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在评估使用单丝和编织缝线进行皮瓣固定相关的口腔ssi发生率。方法:对2020年5月至2024年4月接受口腔肿瘤切除游离皮瓣重建的患者进行回顾性图表分析。皮瓣缝合采用单丝(4-0 PDS®II或Monodiox®)或编织(3-0 Vicryl®)缝合。主要结果是根据美国疾病控制和预防中心的指南定义的口腔ssi发生率。采用多变量logistic回归和基于倾向得分的治疗加权逆概率来估计风险差异。结果:209例符合条件的患者中,58例发生口腔ssi,发生率为27.8%。单丝缝线174例,编织缝线35例。编织缝合组口腔ssi发生率(42.9%)高于单丝缝合组(24.7%)。使用倾向评分分析显示,与单丝缝合线相比,编织缝合线发生口腔ssi的风险明显更高,风险差异为18.5%(95%置信区间,2.1%-34.9%;P = 0.027)。结论:在游离皮瓣重建的口腔肿瘤手术中,编织缝合线可能增加ssi的风险。单丝缝合线被推荐用于重建,特别是口腔底部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation. Clinical Outcomes of Gender-Affirming Surgery in Individuals With Connective Tissue Disorders. Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1