Prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants vs. low molecular weight heparin after urological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2024.2395202
M Ramadhan, A AlMehandi, A Al-Naseem, J Hayat, A Almarzouq
{"title":"Prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants vs. low molecular weight heparin after urological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"M Ramadhan, A AlMehandi, A Al-Naseem, J Hayat, A Almarzouq","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2395202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of using prophylactic direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after major urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were performed up to 9 November 2023, and protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024494424). The primary outcomes were post-operative incidence of VTE and bleeding. The secondary outcomes included re-admissions and transfusions needed, post-operative complications and exploring the radical cystectomy sub-group. Outcomes were reported in 30 and 90 days where feasible with sub-group analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches yielded four studies that included 856 patients and the outcomes were reported within 30 and 90 days, with sub-analysis performed for each time-interval. We found no statistically significant differences between DOAC and LWMH within neither primary nor secondary outcomes; VTE events (RR 0.36; <i>p</i> = 0.06); bleeding events (RR 0.64; <i>p</i> = 0.45); re-admissions (RR 1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.39); transfusions (RR 0.42; <i>p</i> = 0.05) within 0-90 days and post-operative complications within 30 days (RR 0.76; <i>p</i> = 0.17). Similar results were found when exploring radical cystectomy sub-group: VTE risk (RR 0.42, <i>p</i> = 0.15), bleeding risk (RR 1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.90), and re-admissions to hospital (RR 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.35). Limitations include small sample size, and difficult generalization to all urological surgery as most of the analyzed cohort underwent radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs may be a safe and possibly cost-effective alternative to LMWH as post-operative thromboprophylaxis. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations; therefore, more randomized studies are needed to ascertain our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 1","pages":"84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2395202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of using prophylactic direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after major urologic surgery.

Materials and methods: Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were performed up to 9 November 2023, and protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024494424). The primary outcomes were post-operative incidence of VTE and bleeding. The secondary outcomes included re-admissions and transfusions needed, post-operative complications and exploring the radical cystectomy sub-group. Outcomes were reported in 30 and 90 days where feasible with sub-group analysis.

Results: Searches yielded four studies that included 856 patients and the outcomes were reported within 30 and 90 days, with sub-analysis performed for each time-interval. We found no statistically significant differences between DOAC and LWMH within neither primary nor secondary outcomes; VTE events (RR 0.36; p = 0.06); bleeding events (RR 0.64; p = 0.45); re-admissions (RR 1.14; p = 0.39); transfusions (RR 0.42; p = 0.05) within 0-90 days and post-operative complications within 30 days (RR 0.76; p = 0.17). Similar results were found when exploring radical cystectomy sub-group: VTE risk (RR 0.42, p = 0.15), bleeding risk (RR 1.09; p = 0.90), and re-admissions to hospital (RR 1.18, p = 0.35). Limitations include small sample size, and difficult generalization to all urological surgery as most of the analyzed cohort underwent radical cystectomy.

Conclusion: DOACs may be a safe and possibly cost-effective alternative to LMWH as post-operative thromboprophylaxis. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations; therefore, more randomized studies are needed to ascertain our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿外科手术后预防性直接口服抗凝剂与低分子肝素的对比:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:比较预防性口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与低分子肝素(LMWH)在泌尿外科大手术后的疗效。材料和方法:截至2023年11月9日,在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane CENTRAL进行系统文献检索,协议在PROSPERO (CRD42024494424)上注册。主要结局为静脉血栓栓塞发生率和术后出血。次要结果包括再次入院和输血需要,术后并发症和探索根治性膀胱切除术亚组。在可行的情况下,在30天和90天报告结果,并进行亚组分析。结果:检索产生了四项研究,包括856名患者,结果在30天和90天内报告,并对每个时间间隔进行了亚分析。我们发现DOAC和LWMH在主要和次要结局上没有统计学上的显著差异;静脉血栓栓塞事件(RR 0.36;p = 0.06);出血事件(RR 0.64;p = 0.45);再入院率(RR 1.14;p = 0.39);输血(RR 0.42;p = 0.05),术后30天内出现并发症(RR 0.76;p = 0.17)。在探索根治性膀胱切除术亚组时也发现了类似的结果:静脉血栓栓塞风险(RR 0.42, p = 0.15),出血风险(RR 1.09;p = 0.90),再入院率(RR 1.18, p = 0.35)。局限性包括样本量小,难以推广到所有泌尿外科手术,因为大多数分析队列接受了根治性膀胱切除术。结论:DOACs可能是一种安全且可能具有成本效益的替代低分子肝素作为术后血栓预防。然而,由于局限性,这些发现应谨慎解释;因此,需要更多的随机研究来确定我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Prophylactic direct oral anticoagulants vs. low molecular weight heparin after urological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Varicocele repair for severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Scoping review of published guidelines, and systematic review of the literature. The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study. Acupuncture therapy of overactive bladder: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1