The effects of dance on maternal childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-07132-4
Luping Zhang, Ru Yue, Feng Xiao, Fulan Wang, Zhiwei Zhang
{"title":"The effects of dance on maternal childbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luping Zhang, Ru Yue, Feng Xiao, Fulan Wang, Zhiwei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-07132-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous guidelines have clearly stated that dance is safe and beneficial during pregnancy and for childbirth. However, due to the small sample size of individual studies and different interventions, there were inconsistencies about the effect of dance on maternal childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included studies evaluating the effect of dance on women in labor. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data analyses was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 RCTs comprising 1,486 pregnant women were included in the analysis. We found that the rate of natural childbirth and satisfaction with delivery were higher in the dance group than in the control group.The pain at 30 min and at 60 min after the intervention were lower in the dance group than in the control group. Meanwhile, the duration of the first stage, the second stage and the total labor duration was shorter in the dance group than in the control group.However, there were no statistically significant differences in the pain at 90 min after intervention, the duration of the third stage, and the rate of the normal 1-minute Apgar scores > 7 points between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dance during labor could reduce labor pain to an extent, shorten the duration of labor, promote natural childbirth, and improve satisfaction with labor, with no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The protocol for this review was prospectively registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42022351001.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07132-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous guidelines have clearly stated that dance is safe and beneficial during pregnancy and for childbirth. However, due to the small sample size of individual studies and different interventions, there were inconsistencies about the effect of dance on maternal childbirth.

Methods: We included studies evaluating the effect of dance on women in labor. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data analyses was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.4.

Results: A total of 12 RCTs comprising 1,486 pregnant women were included in the analysis. We found that the rate of natural childbirth and satisfaction with delivery were higher in the dance group than in the control group.The pain at 30 min and at 60 min after the intervention were lower in the dance group than in the control group. Meanwhile, the duration of the first stage, the second stage and the total labor duration was shorter in the dance group than in the control group.However, there were no statistically significant differences in the pain at 90 min after intervention, the duration of the third stage, and the rate of the normal 1-minute Apgar scores > 7 points between the two groups.

Conclusions: Dance during labor could reduce labor pain to an extent, shorten the duration of labor, promote natural childbirth, and improve satisfaction with labor, with no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes.

Trial registration: The protocol for this review was prospectively registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42022351001.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舞蹈对产妇分娩的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:以前的指南已经明确指出,在怀孕和分娩期间跳舞是安全有益的。然而,由于个体研究样本量小,干预措施不同,舞蹈对产妇分娩的影响存在不一致性。方法:我们纳入了评估舞蹈对分娩妇女影响的研究。使用修订后的随机对照试验(rct)偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。使用Review Manager软件5.4版本进行数据分析。结果:共纳入12项随机对照试验,包括1486名孕妇。我们发现舞蹈组的自然分娩率和分娩满意度高于对照组。干预后30min和60min,舞蹈组疼痛程度均低于对照组。同时,舞蹈组第一、第二产程和总产程均短于对照组。但两组在干预后90min疼痛程度、第三期持续时间、1分钟Apgar正常评分率bb0.7分差异无统计学意义。结论:产程舞蹈可在一定程度上减轻产痛,缩短产程,促进自然分娩,提高产程满意度,对新生儿结局无不良影响。试验注册:本综述的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)中前瞻性注册,注册号为CRD42022351001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Community Midwifery Care (CMC) on maternal and neonatal wellbeing in postnatal period: a qualitative study. Vaginal birth after two cesarean sections (VBAC-2) under a standardized protocol: success rates, safety, and cesarean after spontaneous labor as an alternative. Factors associated with immediate postnatal care in Lao People's Democratic Republic: an analysis of the 2017 Lao People's Democratic Republic Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Early gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes: do they differ in perinatal outcome- a retrospective analysis. Predicting down syndrome: a comparative evaluation of nasal bone length in mid-trimester pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1