"Ashamed of being seen in an HIV clinic": a qualitative analysis of barriers to engaging in HIV care from the perspectives of patients and healthcare workers in the Daraja clinical trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-21231-z
Elialilia S Okello, Robert N Peck, Benson Issarow, Godfrey Kisigo, Kelvin Abel, Donati Malibwa, Severin Kabakama, Marco Charles, Myung Lee, Thomas Rutachunzibwa, Daniel Fitzgerald, Philip Ayieko, Heiner Grosskurth, Lisa R Metsch, Saidi Kapiga
{"title":"\"Ashamed of being seen in an HIV clinic\": a qualitative analysis of barriers to engaging in HIV care from the perspectives of patients and healthcare workers in the Daraja clinical trial.","authors":"Elialilia S Okello, Robert N Peck, Benson Issarow, Godfrey Kisigo, Kelvin Abel, Donati Malibwa, Severin Kabakama, Marco Charles, Myung Lee, Thomas Rutachunzibwa, Daniel Fitzgerald, Philip Ayieko, Heiner Grosskurth, Lisa R Metsch, Saidi Kapiga","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-21231-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is high post-hospital discharge mortality among persons with HIV who are hospitalized, and post-hospital survival is strongly associated with early HIV clinic linkage, clinic attendance, and antiretroviral therapy adherence. The Daraja intervention, a context-tailored case management strategy implemented and tested through a randomized trial in Tanzania, was associated with improved HIV clinic linkage, retention, and ART initiation and adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) in a sub-sample of 40 study participants (20 control and 20 intervention) 12 months after enrollment into the trial to gain an in-depth understanding of the barriers to HIV care engagement and the perceived mechanisms through which the Daraja intervention impacted these barriers. We also conducted IDIs with 20 health care providers. We used a thematic analysis approach to generate themes following the Gelberg-Andersen behavioral model for vulnerable population domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived stigma, coupled with the mistrust of healthcare providers, underemployment or lack of reliable income, unreliable transport, and a lack of social support, were identified as key barriers to HIV clinic attendance and ART adherence. Perceived stigma complicated not only linking to and attending an HIV clinic but also decision-making regarding the choice of the clinic's location. The Daraja intervention was reported to help normalise HIV diagnosis, plug the social support gap, increase patients' self-efficacy and their capacity of participants to navigate the HIV clinic during HIV clinic linkage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These qualitative research results identified several important barriers to engaging in HIV care and provide insights into the mechanisms through which the Daraja intervention operated to affect the perceived stigma, social support, self-efficacy, and increased capacity of participants to navigate the HIV clinic during HIV clinic linkage.</p><p><strong>Daraja trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03858998. Registered on 01 March 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21231-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is high post-hospital discharge mortality among persons with HIV who are hospitalized, and post-hospital survival is strongly associated with early HIV clinic linkage, clinic attendance, and antiretroviral therapy adherence. The Daraja intervention, a context-tailored case management strategy implemented and tested through a randomized trial in Tanzania, was associated with improved HIV clinic linkage, retention, and ART initiation and adherence.

Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) in a sub-sample of 40 study participants (20 control and 20 intervention) 12 months after enrollment into the trial to gain an in-depth understanding of the barriers to HIV care engagement and the perceived mechanisms through which the Daraja intervention impacted these barriers. We also conducted IDIs with 20 health care providers. We used a thematic analysis approach to generate themes following the Gelberg-Andersen behavioral model for vulnerable population domains.

Results: Perceived stigma, coupled with the mistrust of healthcare providers, underemployment or lack of reliable income, unreliable transport, and a lack of social support, were identified as key barriers to HIV clinic attendance and ART adherence. Perceived stigma complicated not only linking to and attending an HIV clinic but also decision-making regarding the choice of the clinic's location. The Daraja intervention was reported to help normalise HIV diagnosis, plug the social support gap, increase patients' self-efficacy and their capacity of participants to navigate the HIV clinic during HIV clinic linkage.

Conclusion: These qualitative research results identified several important barriers to engaging in HIV care and provide insights into the mechanisms through which the Daraja intervention operated to affect the perceived stigma, social support, self-efficacy, and increased capacity of participants to navigate the HIV clinic during HIV clinic linkage.

Daraja trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03858998. Registered on 01 March 2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“羞于在艾滋病毒诊所被人看到”:从Daraja临床试验中患者和医护人员的角度定性分析参与艾滋病毒护理的障碍。
背景:住院的艾滋病毒感染者出院后死亡率很高,院后生存率与早期艾滋病毒门诊联系、门诊出勤和抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性密切相关。Daraja干预措施是一项针对具体情况的病例管理策略,在坦桑尼亚通过一项随机试验实施并进行了测试。该干预措施与改善艾滋病毒诊所联系、保留以及抗逆转录病毒治疗的启动和坚持有关。方法:在入组12个月后,我们对40名研究参与者(20名对照组和20名干预组)进行了深度访谈(IDIs),以深入了解参与艾滋病毒护理的障碍以及Daraja干预影响这些障碍的感知机制。我们还与20名保健提供者进行了IDIs。我们使用主题分析方法根据Gelberg-Andersen行为模型为弱势群体领域生成主题。结果:感知到的耻辱,加上对医疗保健提供者的不信任,就业不足或缺乏可靠的收入,不可靠的交通,以及缺乏社会支持,被确定为艾滋病毒诊所就诊和抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的主要障碍。感知到的耻辱感不仅使与艾滋病毒诊所的联系和就诊变得复杂,而且使选择诊所地点的决策变得复杂。据报道,Daraja干预有助于使艾滋病毒诊断正常化,填补社会支持差距,提高患者的自我效能感和参与者在艾滋病毒诊所联系期间导航艾滋病毒诊所的能力。结论:这些定性研究结果确定了参与艾滋病毒护理的几个重要障碍,并提供了Daraja干预在艾滋病毒诊所联系期间影响感知耻辱,社会支持,自我效能和增加参与者浏览艾滋病毒诊所能力的机制。Daraja试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03858998。2019年3月1日注册
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Process evaluation of Project Daire: a food environment intervention that impacted food knowledge, wellbeing and dietary habits of primary school children. Spatio-temporal modelling of extreme low birth rates in U.S. counties. Investigating mental health disparities in rural sexual and gender minority adults: protocol for the rural exploration and approaches to LGBTQ + Mental Health (REALM) prospective cohort study. Association of ambient temperatures with suicide attempts and violence with the future projections under climate change scenarios: a nationwide time-stratified case-crossover study in South Korea. Prevalence of mental disorders and work ability among unemployed individuals in Germany: a register-based analysis of socio-medical assessments by the Federal Employment Agency between 2016 and 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1