Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8
Balcha Negese Kebede, Seid Mohammed Seid, Eyerus Gesesse Samuel
{"title":"Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023.","authors":"Balcha Negese Kebede, Seid Mohammed Seid, Eyerus Gesesse Samuel","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in the \"real world\" it is important to consider contrast sensitivity when prescribing corrective lenses. There is limited evidence on how refractive error and its correction affect contrast sensitivity in the study area. Therefore, this study is important to understand how refractive correction affects contrast sensitivity, which is important baseline information for prescribing refractive error correction.</p><p><strong>Objective of this study: </strong>This study aimed to measure the mean difference in contrast sensitivity with and without corrective lenses in patients with refractive error.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Objective and subjective refractions were done for each patient, then Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity was measured for them using computer based Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m. Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity value (Log CS) with and without corrective lenses were recorded for each study participant. The collected data were checked for completeness and analyzed using SPSS 26. Descriptive analyses, independent sample t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare CS means; the findings are presented using tables and pie charts. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two patients attending refraction clinics participated in this study with response rate 98.19% of which 51.9% were male. The mean age of the participants was 34.28 ± 12.79 (SD). The mean contrast sensitivity increased from 1.29 ± 0.35 (SD) to1.51 ± 0.28 (SD) LogCS units with refractive correction (p = 0.000). There is no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between the types of refractive errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Uncorrected refractive can affect contrast sensitivity; therefore, proper refractive correction is essential to improve visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in the "real world" it is important to consider contrast sensitivity when prescribing corrective lenses. There is limited evidence on how refractive error and its correction affect contrast sensitivity in the study area. Therefore, this study is important to understand how refractive correction affects contrast sensitivity, which is important baseline information for prescribing refractive error correction.

Objective of this study: This study aimed to measure the mean difference in contrast sensitivity with and without corrective lenses in patients with refractive error.

Methods: Objective and subjective refractions were done for each patient, then Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity was measured for them using computer based Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m. Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity value (Log CS) with and without corrective lenses were recorded for each study participant. The collected data were checked for completeness and analyzed using SPSS 26. Descriptive analyses, independent sample t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare CS means; the findings are presented using tables and pie charts. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

Results: One hundred sixty-two patients attending refraction clinics participated in this study with response rate 98.19% of which 51.9% were male. The mean age of the participants was 34.28 ± 12.79 (SD). The mean contrast sensitivity increased from 1.29 ± 0.35 (SD) to1.51 ± 0.28 (SD) LogCS units with refractive correction (p = 0.000). There is no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between the types of refractive errors.

Conclusion and recommendation: Uncorrected refractive can affect contrast sensitivity; therefore, proper refractive correction is essential to improve visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023年埃塞俄比亚希达马阿瓦萨屈光不正患者屈光不正矫正前后的对比敏感度。
背景:对比灵敏度是衡量视觉质量的重要指标。与较差的近距离和远距离视力相比,较差的对比敏感度与坠落损伤的风险密切相关。由于良好的视力并不一定与“现实世界”中的良好视觉表现相关,因此在处方矫正镜片时考虑对比灵敏度是很重要的。关于屈光不正及其矫正如何影响研究区域的对比灵敏度的证据有限。因此,这项研究对于了解屈光矫正如何影响对比敏感度具有重要意义,这是处方屈光不正矫正的重要基线信息。本研究目的:本研究旨在测量屈光不正患者配戴和不配戴矫正镜片对比敏感度的平均差异。方法:分别对患者进行客观和主观屈光检查,并在1 m处采用计算机Pelli-Robson对比敏感度测定。记录每位受试者佩戴和不佩戴矫正镜时的Pelli- Robson对比敏感度值(Log CS)。收集的数据进行完整性检查,并使用SPSS 26进行分析。采用描述性分析、独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析比较CS均值;研究结果用表格和饼状图呈现。p值≤0.05表示差异有统计学意义。结果:就诊于屈光诊所的162例患者参与了本研究,有效率为98.19%,其中男性占51.9%。参与者平均年龄为34.28±12.79 (SD)。平均对比敏感度从1.29±0.35 (SD)增加到1.51±0.28 (SD) LogCS单位(p = 0.000)。不同类型屈光不正的对比敏感度无显著差异。结论与建议:未矫正的屈光会影响对比敏感度;因此,适当的屈光矫正对于提高视力和对比敏感度至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing structural and vascular parameters between advanced pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma using optical coherence tomography angiography. Phaeoisaria sp. fungal keratitis resembling corneal rust residue: a case report. Quantitative evaluation of the wide-field fundus photographs in eyes with severe stage 3 and stage 4A retinopathy of prematurity. Incidence of ophthalmic manifestations in congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV). Increased aqueous humor levels of endothelin-1 in patients with open angle glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1