Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BMC Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03934-y
Yan Zhang, Anke Winter, Belén Alejos Ferreras, Paola Carioni, Otto Arkossy, Michael Anger, Robert Kossmann, Len A Usvyat, Stefano Stuard, Franklin W Maddux
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of hemodialysis modalities: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yan Zhang, Anke Winter, Belén Alejos Ferreras, Paola Carioni, Otto Arkossy, Michael Anger, Robert Kossmann, Len A Usvyat, Stefano Stuard, Franklin W Maddux","doi":"10.1186/s12882-024-03934-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Results from the CONVINCE clinical trial suggest a 23% mortality risk reduction among patients receiving high-volume (> 23 L) hemodiafiltration. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of blood-based kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with hemodiafiltration vs. hemodialysis in a large, unselected patient population treated prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed pseudonymized data from 85,117 adults receiving in-center care across NephroCare clinics in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa during 2019-2022. Cox regression models with KRT modality and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status as time-varying covariates, and adjusted for multiple confounders, were used to estimate all-cause (primary) and cardiovascular (secondary) mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, dialysis vintage, COVID-19 status, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 55% of patients were receiving hemodialysis and 45% of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. Baseline characteristics were similar between baseline modalities, except that hemodiafiltration patients were a median of 2 years younger, had higher percentage of fistula access (66% vs. 47%), and had longer mean dialysis vintages (4.4 years vs. 2.6 years). Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.76-0.80), irrespective of COVID-19 infection. The pattern of a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration was consistently observed among all analyzed subgroups. Among patients receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration (mean convection volume ≥ 23 L), the risk of death was reduced by 30% (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.68-0.72]). Hemodiafiltration was also associated with a 31% reduced risk of cardiovascular death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that hemodiafiltration has a beneficial effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large, unselected patient population and across patient subgroups in real-world settings. Our study complements evidence from the CONVINCE trial and adds to the growing body of real-world evidence on hemodiafiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03934-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Results from the CONVINCE clinical trial suggest a 23% mortality risk reduction among patients receiving high-volume (> 23 L) hemodiafiltration. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of blood-based kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with hemodiafiltration vs. hemodialysis in a large, unselected patient population treated prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed pseudonymized data from 85,117 adults receiving in-center care across NephroCare clinics in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa during 2019-2022. Cox regression models with KRT modality and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status as time-varying covariates, and adjusted for multiple confounders, were used to estimate all-cause (primary) and cardiovascular (secondary) mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, dialysis vintage, COVID-19 status, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

Results: At baseline, 55% of patients were receiving hemodialysis and 45% of patients were receiving hemodiafiltration. Baseline characteristics were similar between baseline modalities, except that hemodiafiltration patients were a median of 2 years younger, had higher percentage of fistula access (66% vs. 47%), and had longer mean dialysis vintages (4.4 years vs. 2.6 years). Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.76-0.80), irrespective of COVID-19 infection. The pattern of a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration was consistently observed among all analyzed subgroups. Among patients receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration (mean convection volume ≥ 23 L), the risk of death was reduced by 30% (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.68-0.72]). Hemodiafiltration was also associated with a 31% reduced risk of cardiovascular death.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that hemodiafiltration has a beneficial effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large, unselected patient population and across patient subgroups in real-world settings. Our study complements evidence from the CONVINCE trial and adds to the growing body of real-world evidence on hemodiafiltration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液透析方式的实际有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:CONVINCE临床试验的结果表明,接受大容量(bbb23 L)血液滤过的患者死亡风险降低23%。我们评估了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间接受治疗的大量未选择的患者群体中,血液滤过血液替代疗法(KRT)与血液透析的实际有效性。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2019-2022年期间欧洲、中东和非洲肾保健诊所接受中心护理的85,117名成年人的假名数据。以KRT模式和2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)状态为时变协变量的Cox回归模型,并针对多个混杂因素进行调整,用于估计全因(原发性)和心血管(继发性)死亡率。对年龄、透析年份、COVID-19状态、糖尿病和心血管疾病进行亚组分析。结果:基线时,55%的患者接受血液透析,45%的患者接受血液滤过。基线特征在基线模式之间相似,除了血液滤过患者的中位数年轻2岁,具有更高的瘘管通路百分比(66%对47%),并且平均透析时间更长(4.4年对2.6年)。与血液透析相比,与COVID-19感染无关,血液滤过与全因死亡率的校正危险比(HR)为0.78(95%可信区间[Cl], 0.76-0.80)相关。在所有分析的亚组中都一致观察到血液滤过的有益效果。在接受大容量血液滤过(平均对流容积≥23 L)的患者中,死亡风险降低30% (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.68-0.72])。血液滤过也与心血管死亡风险降低31%相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在现实环境中,在大量未选择的患者群体和跨患者亚组中,血液滤过对全因死亡率和心血管死亡率有有益的影响。我们的研究补充了来自说服试验的证据,并增加了越来越多的关于血液滤过的真实证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
C3 mutation-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome with severe renal dysfunction and hypertensive emergency successfully treated with ravulizumab and sacubitril/valsartan: a case report. FSTIV score is essential for clinical management and predicts outcome of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Mesangial sclerosing glomerulopathy following luspatercept treatment - a case report. Influential factors of benefit finding in hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study using the social-ecological model. Predictive role of baseline serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio for renal dysfunction incidence in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1