Neurological Biomarker Profiles in Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) Pilots and Aircrew.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.3390/brainsci14121296
Shawn G Rhind, Maria Y Shiu, Oshin Vartanian, Shamus Allen, Miriam Palmer, Joel Ramirez, Fuqiang Gao, Christopher J M Scott, Meissa F Homes, Gary Gray, Sandra E Black, Joan Saary
{"title":"Neurological Biomarker Profiles in Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) Pilots and Aircrew.","authors":"Shawn G Rhind, Maria Y Shiu, Oshin Vartanian, Shamus Allen, Miriam Palmer, Joel Ramirez, Fuqiang Gao, Christopher J M Scott, Meissa F Homes, Gary Gray, Sandra E Black, Joan Saary","doi":"10.3390/brainsci14121296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Military aviators can be exposed to extreme physiological stressors, including decompression stress, G-forces, as well as intermittent hypoxia and/or hyperoxia, which may contribute to neurobiological dysfunction/damage. This study aimed to investigate the levels of neurological biomarkers in military aviators to assess the potential risk of long-term brain injury and neurodegeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 48 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) aviators and 48 non-aviator CAF controls. Plasma samples were analyzed for biomarkers of glial activation (GFAP), axonal damage (NF-L, pNF-H), oxidative stress (PRDX-6), and neurodegeneration (T-tau), along with S100b, NSE, and UCHL-1. The biomarker concentrations were quantified using multiplexed immunoassays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aviators exhibited significantly elevated levels of GFAP, NF-L, PRDX-6, and T-tau compared to the CAF controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating increased glial activation, axonal injury, and oxidative stress. Trends toward higher levels of S100b, NSE, and UCHL-1 were observed but were not statistically significant. The elevated biomarker levels suggest cumulative brain damage, raising concerns about potential long-term neurological impairments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Military aviators are at increased risk for neurobiological injury, including glial and axonal damage, oxidative stress, and early neurodegeneration. These findings emphasize the importance of proactive monitoring and further research to understand the long-term impacts of high-altitude flight on brain health and to develop strategies for mitigating cognitive decline and neurodegenerative risks in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Military aviators can be exposed to extreme physiological stressors, including decompression stress, G-forces, as well as intermittent hypoxia and/or hyperoxia, which may contribute to neurobiological dysfunction/damage. This study aimed to investigate the levels of neurological biomarkers in military aviators to assess the potential risk of long-term brain injury and neurodegeneration.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 48 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) aviators and 48 non-aviator CAF controls. Plasma samples were analyzed for biomarkers of glial activation (GFAP), axonal damage (NF-L, pNF-H), oxidative stress (PRDX-6), and neurodegeneration (T-tau), along with S100b, NSE, and UCHL-1. The biomarker concentrations were quantified using multiplexed immunoassays.

Results: The aviators exhibited significantly elevated levels of GFAP, NF-L, PRDX-6, and T-tau compared to the CAF controls (p < 0.001), indicating increased glial activation, axonal injury, and oxidative stress. Trends toward higher levels of S100b, NSE, and UCHL-1 were observed but were not statistically significant. The elevated biomarker levels suggest cumulative brain damage, raising concerns about potential long-term neurological impairments.

Conclusions: Military aviators are at increased risk for neurobiological injury, including glial and axonal damage, oxidative stress, and early neurodegeneration. These findings emphasize the importance of proactive monitoring and further research to understand the long-term impacts of high-altitude flight on brain health and to develop strategies for mitigating cognitive decline and neurodegenerative risks in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大皇家空军(RCAF)飞行员和机组人员的神经生物标志物概况。
背景/目的:军事飞行员可能暴露于极端的生理应激源,包括减压应激,重力,以及间歇性缺氧和/或高氧,这可能导致神经生物学功能障碍/损伤。本研究旨在调查军事飞行员的神经生物标志物水平,以评估长期脑损伤和神经变性的潜在风险。方法:这项横断面研究涉及48名加拿大武装部队(CAF)飞行员和48名非飞行员CAF对照组。分析血浆样本中的生物标志物,包括神经胶质活化(GFAP)、轴突损伤(NF-L、pNF-H)、氧化应激(PRDX-6)和神经退行性变(T-tau),以及S100b、NSE和UCHL-1。使用多重免疫分析法定量生物标志物浓度。结果:与CAF对照组相比,飞行员的GFAP、NF-L、PRDX-6和T-tau水平显著升高(p < 0.001),表明神经胶质活化、轴突损伤和氧化应激增加。观察到S100b、NSE和UCHL-1水平升高的趋势,但无统计学意义。升高的生物标志物水平表明累积性脑损伤,引起了对潜在的长期神经损伤的担忧。结论:军事飞行员神经生物学损伤的风险增加,包括神经胶质和轴突损伤、氧化应激和早期神经变性。这些发现强调了主动监测和进一步研究的重要性,以了解高空飞行对大脑健康的长期影响,并制定减轻这一人群认知能力下降和神经退行性风险的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
期刊最新文献
The Body as a Vessel for Trauma: The Clinical Case Study of Aisha. EEG-Based ADHD Classification Using Autoencoder Feature Extraction and ResNet with Double Augmented Attention Mechanism. Vigorous Exercise Enhances Verbal Fluency Performance in Healthy Young Adults. Gustatory-Visual Interaction in Human Brain Cortex: fNIRS Study. Exploring the Dimensions of Perfectionism in Adolescence: A Multi-Method Study on Mental Health and CBT-Based Psychoeducation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1