The Healthy Supermarket Coach: effects of a nutrition peer-education intervention in Dutch supermarkets on adolescents' food purchases.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03828-8
Marlijn Huitink, Maartje P Poelman, Jacob C Seidell, Jos W R Twisk, S Coosje Dijkstra
{"title":"The Healthy Supermarket Coach: effects of a nutrition peer-education intervention in Dutch supermarkets on adolescents' food purchases.","authors":"Marlijn Huitink, Maartje P Poelman, Jacob C Seidell, Jos W R Twisk, S Coosje Dijkstra","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03828-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dutch adolescents predominantly purchase unhealthy snacks in supermarkets, which negatively influence their health. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and longer-term effects of a nutrition peer-education intervention in supermarkets on food purchases and determinants of food purchase behaviour among adolescents of different education levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a quasi-experimental study in three supermarkets (two intervention and one comparison school) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The intervention schools received a 45-min peer-education workshop in the supermarket near their school, and the comparison school received no intervention. The workshops also included a 2-week 'healthy snacking challenge' and were led by two young supermarket employees. Measurements were performed 2 weeks before the intervention (T0) 2 weeks after (T1) and 3 months (T2) after the intervention. Cash receipts were used to examine food purchases (n = 458) and questionnaires to examine determinants of food purchase behaviour (n = 463).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nutrition peer-education intervention did not improve food purchases but did improve several determinants of food purchase behaviour. Adolescents from the intervention schools reported improved nutritional knowledge (β = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.04-0.72) at T1, more favourable attitudes (β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.00-0.42) and stronger social support (β = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.02-0.53) for healthy food purchases at T2 compared to those from the comparison schools. Adolescents with a low level of education reported more short- and longer-term improvements of determinants of food purchase behaviour compared to those with a higher level of education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While nutrition peer education in supermarkets did not improve adolescents' food purchases in the supermarket, determinants of food purchase behaviour did improve. The intervention was especially effective among adolescents with a low level of education. Nevertheless, to promote healthy food purchases of adolescents in supermarkets, more efforts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11714951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03828-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dutch adolescents predominantly purchase unhealthy snacks in supermarkets, which negatively influence their health. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and longer-term effects of a nutrition peer-education intervention in supermarkets on food purchases and determinants of food purchase behaviour among adolescents of different education levels.

Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental study in three supermarkets (two intervention and one comparison school) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The intervention schools received a 45-min peer-education workshop in the supermarket near their school, and the comparison school received no intervention. The workshops also included a 2-week 'healthy snacking challenge' and were led by two young supermarket employees. Measurements were performed 2 weeks before the intervention (T0) 2 weeks after (T1) and 3 months (T2) after the intervention. Cash receipts were used to examine food purchases (n = 458) and questionnaires to examine determinants of food purchase behaviour (n = 463).

Results: The nutrition peer-education intervention did not improve food purchases but did improve several determinants of food purchase behaviour. Adolescents from the intervention schools reported improved nutritional knowledge (β = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.04-0.72) at T1, more favourable attitudes (β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.00-0.42) and stronger social support (β = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.02-0.53) for healthy food purchases at T2 compared to those from the comparison schools. Adolescents with a low level of education reported more short- and longer-term improvements of determinants of food purchase behaviour compared to those with a higher level of education.

Conclusions: While nutrition peer education in supermarkets did not improve adolescents' food purchases in the supermarket, determinants of food purchase behaviour did improve. The intervention was especially effective among adolescents with a low level of education. Nevertheless, to promote healthy food purchases of adolescents in supermarkets, more efforts are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康超市教练:荷兰超市营养同伴教育干预对青少年食品购买的影响。
背景:荷兰青少年主要在超市购买不健康的零食,这对他们的健康产生了负面影响。本研究的目的是调查超市营养同伴教育干预对食品购买的短期和长期影响,以及不同教育水平的青少年食品购买行为的决定因素。方法:我们在荷兰阿姆斯特丹的三家超市(两家干预学校和一家比较学校)进行了一项准实验研究。干预学校在学校附近的超市接受了45分钟的同伴教育研讨会,而比较学校没有接受干预。研讨会还包括一个为期两周的“健康零食挑战”,由两名年轻的超市员工领导。测量于干预前2周(T0)、干预后2周(T1)和干预后3个月(T2)进行。现金收据用于检查食品购买(n = 458),问卷调查用于检查食品购买行为的决定因素(n = 463)。结果:营养同伴教育干预并没有改善食品购买行为,但确实改善了食品购买行为的几个决定因素。与比较学校的青少年相比,干预学校的青少年在T1时营养知识有所改善(β = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.04-0.72),在T2时对健康食品的购买态度更有利(β = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.00-0.42),社会支持更强(β = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.02-0.53)。与受教育程度较高的青少年相比,受教育程度较低的青少年报告的食品购买行为决定因素的短期和长期改善更多。结论:虽然超市的营养同伴教育并没有改善青少年在超市的食品购买行为,但食品购买行为的决定因素确实有所改善。这种干预对受教育程度低的青少年尤其有效。然而,为了促进青少年在超市购买健康食品,还需要更多的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
fMRI-guided V1-targeted rTMS improves depressive symptoms in adolescents and young adults with bipolar disorder: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Parental income in childhood and health outcomes across age groups: a register-based study from Norway. Long-term risk of offspring type 1 and type 2 diabetes following maternal gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide birth cohort study with 10-year follow-up. AI-based quality control was associated with improved fetal ultrasound image quality in low-resource settings: a real-world multicenter study from West China. Hypothesis-free evaluation of circulating metabolome provides cell-specific insights regarding the role of energy substrate availability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1