Predicting 28-day all-cause mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units with pre-existing chronic heart failure using the stress hyperglycemia ratio: a machine learning-driven retrospective cohort analysis.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Diabetology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1186/s12933-025-02577-z
Xiao-Han Li, Xing-Long Yang, Bin-Bin Dong, Qi Liu
{"title":"Predicting 28-day all-cause mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units with pre-existing chronic heart failure using the stress hyperglycemia ratio: a machine learning-driven retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Xiao-Han Li, Xing-Long Yang, Bin-Bin Dong, Qi Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02577-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic heart failure (CHF) poses a significant threat to human health. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a novel metric for accurately assessing stress hyperglycemia, which has been correlated with adverse outcomes in various major diseases. However, it remains unclear whether SHR is associated with 28-day mortality in patients with pre-existing CHF who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This study retrospectively recruited patients who were admitted to ICUs with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. Characteristics were compared between the survival and non-survival groups. The relationship between SHR and 28-day all-cause mortality was analyzed using restricted cubic splines, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The importance of the potential risk factors was assessed using the Boruta algorithm. Prediction models were constructed using machine learning algorithms. A total of 913 patients were enrolled. The risk of 28-day mortality increased with higher SHR levels (P < 0.001). SHR was independently associated with 28-day all-cause mortality, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45 (P < 0.001) and an adjusted HR of 1.43 (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found that none of the potential risk factors, such as demographics, comorbidities, and drugs, affected the relationship (P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the ROC (AUC) curve for SHR was larger than those for admission blood glucose and HbA1c; the cut-off for SHR was 0.57. Patients with SHR higher than the cut-off had a significantly lower 28-day survival probability (P < 0.001). SHR was identified as one of the key factors for 28-day mortality by the Boruta algorithm. The predictive performance was verified through four machine learning algorithms, with the neural network algorithm being the best (AUC 0.801). For patients with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF, SHR was an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality. Its prognostic performance surpasses those of HbA1c and blood glucose, and prognostic models based on SHR provide clinicians with an effective tool to make therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11714879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02577-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) poses a significant threat to human health. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a novel metric for accurately assessing stress hyperglycemia, which has been correlated with adverse outcomes in various major diseases. However, it remains unclear whether SHR is associated with 28-day mortality in patients with pre-existing CHF who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This study retrospectively recruited patients who were admitted to ICUs with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. Characteristics were compared between the survival and non-survival groups. The relationship between SHR and 28-day all-cause mortality was analyzed using restricted cubic splines, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The importance of the potential risk factors was assessed using the Boruta algorithm. Prediction models were constructed using machine learning algorithms. A total of 913 patients were enrolled. The risk of 28-day mortality increased with higher SHR levels (P < 0.001). SHR was independently associated with 28-day all-cause mortality, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45 (P < 0.001) and an adjusted HR of 1.43 (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found that none of the potential risk factors, such as demographics, comorbidities, and drugs, affected the relationship (P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the ROC (AUC) curve for SHR was larger than those for admission blood glucose and HbA1c; the cut-off for SHR was 0.57. Patients with SHR higher than the cut-off had a significantly lower 28-day survival probability (P < 0.001). SHR was identified as one of the key factors for 28-day mortality by the Boruta algorithm. The predictive performance was verified through four machine learning algorithms, with the neural network algorithm being the best (AUC 0.801). For patients with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF, SHR was an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality. Its prognostic performance surpasses those of HbA1c and blood glucose, and prognostic models based on SHR provide clinicians with an effective tool to make therapeutic decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用应激性高血糖比率预测重症监护病房已有慢性心力衰竭患者28天全因死亡率:一项机器学习驱动的回顾性队列分析
慢性心力衰竭(CHF)对人类健康构成重大威胁。应激性高血糖比(SHR)是一种准确评估应激性高血糖的新指标,与多种主要疾病的不良结局相关。然而,尚不清楚SHR是否与入住重症监护病房(icu)的预先存在的CHF患者的28天死亡率相关。本研究回顾性地从重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC)数据库中招募了同时患有急性危重疾病和先前存在的CHF的icu患者。比较生存组和非生存组的特征。采用限制性三次样条、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归分析分析SHR与28天全因死亡率的关系。使用Boruta算法评估潜在危险因素的重要性。使用机器学习算法构建预测模型。共有913名患者入组。SHR水平越高,28天死亡风险越高(P < 0.05)。SHR的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)大于入院血糖和HbA1c;SHR的临界值为0.57。SHR高于临界值的患者28天生存率显著降低(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Does diabetes modify the triglyceride-glucose index associated with cardiovascular events and mortality? A meta-analysis of 50 cohorts involving 7,239,790 participants. Correlation between atherogenic index of plasma and cardiovascular disease risk across Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3: a nationwide prospective cohort study. Obesity-induced mesenteric PVAT remodelling is sexually dimorphic, but not driven by ovarian hormones : Short title: Obesity induces sex-specific responses in mesenteric PVAT. Proteinuria and the risk of Incident atrial fibrillation according to glycemic stages: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1