Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31404
K A J van Beek, M J C Timmermans, L Derks, J M Cheng, A O Kraaijeveld, E K Arkenbout, C E Schotborgh, J Brouwer, B E Claessen, E Lipsic, J Polad, L X van Nunen, K Sjauw, D van Veghel, P A Tonino, K Teeuwen
{"title":"Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.","authors":"K A J van Beek, M J C Timmermans, L Derks, J M Cheng, A O Kraaijeveld, E K Arkenbout, C E Schotborgh, J Brouwer, B E Claessen, E Lipsic, J Polad, L X van Nunen, K Sjauw, D van Veghel, P A Tonino, K Teeuwen","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Post-dilatation after stenting with a non-compliant (NC) balloon can be used to improve overall percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) result. Due to lack of evidence on the effect of post-dilatation on adverse clinical endpoints there is no consensus whether post-dilatation should be used routinely. The aim of the current study was to determine the contemporary practice of post-dilatation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration who underwent PCI between the 4th quarter of 2020 and the 3rd quarter of 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-dilatation with a NC balloon. Secondary endpoints included differences in baseline and procedural characteristics of patients that received post-dilatation and patients that did not receive post-dilatation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 12,960 patients from 11 hospitals, 49.9% underwent post-dilatation. There was a variety in post-dilatation between hospitals ranging from 29.3% to 82.7% and among operators ranging from 15.9% to 90.5%. Post-dilatation was used less frequent in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or out of hospital cardiac arrest. Multivessel and left main PCI, long stent length and use of intracoronary imaging and calcium modification were associated with increased use of post-dilatation. When imaging was used, the percentage of post-dilatation was 79.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the Netherlands, stent optimization with post-dilatation using NC balloon is performed in only half of the patients undergoing PCI, with variations in frequency across centres and operators. Post-dilatation is more often used in cases of complex PCI and when intracoronary imaging or calcium modification techniques are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Post-dilatation after stenting with a non-compliant (NC) balloon can be used to improve overall percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) result. Due to lack of evidence on the effect of post-dilatation on adverse clinical endpoints there is no consensus whether post-dilatation should be used routinely. The aim of the current study was to determine the contemporary practice of post-dilatation.

Methods: This study included patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration who underwent PCI between the 4th quarter of 2020 and the 3rd quarter of 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-dilatation with a NC balloon. Secondary endpoints included differences in baseline and procedural characteristics of patients that received post-dilatation and patients that did not receive post-dilatation.

Results: Out of 12,960 patients from 11 hospitals, 49.9% underwent post-dilatation. There was a variety in post-dilatation between hospitals ranging from 29.3% to 82.7% and among operators ranging from 15.9% to 90.5%. Post-dilatation was used less frequent in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or out of hospital cardiac arrest. Multivessel and left main PCI, long stent length and use of intracoronary imaging and calcium modification were associated with increased use of post-dilatation. When imaging was used, the percentage of post-dilatation was 79.4%.

Conclusions: In the Netherlands, stent optimization with post-dilatation using NC balloon is performed in only half of the patients undergoing PCI, with variations in frequency across centres and operators. Post-dilatation is more often used in cases of complex PCI and when intracoronary imaging or calcium modification techniques are used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中支架扩张后优化的当代应用来自荷兰心脏登记的结果。
背景:非合规球囊支架置入术后扩张可改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的整体效果。由于缺乏关于扩张后对不良临床终点影响的证据,因此是否应该常规使用扩张后尚无共识。本研究的目的是确定当代扩张后的实践。方法:本研究包括来自荷兰心脏注册中心的患者,他们在2020年第四季度至2021年第三季度期间接受了PCI。主要终点是NC球囊扩张后的发生率。次要终点包括接受扩张术后患者和未接受扩张术后患者的基线和程序特征差异。结果:在11家医院的12960例患者中,49.9%的患者接受了扩张后手术。术后扩张率在医院间为29.3% ~ 82.7%,在操作者间为15.9% ~ 90.5%。在出现st段抬高型心肌梗死或院外心脏骤停的患者中,扩张术的使用频率较低。多血管和左主干PCI、较长的支架长度、冠状动脉内显像和钙修饰的使用与扩张后使用的增加有关。影像学检查时,扩张后的比例为79.4%。结论:在荷兰,只有一半接受PCI的患者使用NC球囊进行支架扩张后优化,不同中心和手术人员的频率有所不同。在复杂的PCI和冠状动脉内显像或钙修饰技术的情况下,扩张后更常被使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
INtravaScular OptIcal Frequency Domain ImaGing EvaluaTion of the Femoropopliteal Lesion With JETSTREAM Atherectomy (INSIGHT JETSTREAM). Myocardial Infarction and All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusions: A West Denmark Heart Registry Study. Issue Information Do We Need to Perform Control Angiography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Tirofiban Infusion? First Application of Combined Cutting Balloon and Rotational Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy in Old Degenerated Saphenous Venous Graft.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1