Expert Rater Agreement for Symptoms and Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in Youth.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Child Psychiatry & Human Development Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01797-w
Jarrod M Leffler, Daniel Azzopardi, Peter S Jensen, Paul E Croarkin, Kathryn R Cullen, Anne Duffy, Bonnie Klimes-Dougan, Robert M Post, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Karen Dineen Wagner, Dwight V Wolf, Cathryn A Galanter
{"title":"Expert Rater Agreement for Symptoms and Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in Youth.","authors":"Jarrod M Leffler, Daniel Azzopardi, Peter S Jensen, Paul E Croarkin, Kathryn R Cullen, Anne Duffy, Bonnie Klimes-Dougan, Robert M Post, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Karen Dineen Wagner, Dwight V Wolf, Cathryn A Galanter","doi":"10.1007/s10578-024-01797-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in young children has been a topic of debate, in part owing to varied interpretation of manic-like symptoms. We examined how expert academic clinicians participating in the pediatric bipolar biobank varied in their interpretation and application of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and diagnoses. Study co-investigators reviewed 12 standardized narratives and for each marked a visual analog scale with their confidence in the presence of manic episodes and criteria. We analyzed raters' confidence and inter-rater agreement using interclass correlation (ICC). Symptoms with good ICC ranging from 0.60 to 0.74 included inflated self-esteem/grandiosity and decreased need for sleep. Diagnoses and episodes with poor ICCs (< 0.4) included Hypomania and Bipolar Not Elsewhere Classified/Not Otherwise Specified. Despite efforts made to refine BD criteria with DSM-5, there was substantive variation in diagnostic interpretation among investigators working with children presenting with manic-like symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01797-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in young children has been a topic of debate, in part owing to varied interpretation of manic-like symptoms. We examined how expert academic clinicians participating in the pediatric bipolar biobank varied in their interpretation and application of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria and diagnoses. Study co-investigators reviewed 12 standardized narratives and for each marked a visual analog scale with their confidence in the presence of manic episodes and criteria. We analyzed raters' confidence and inter-rater agreement using interclass correlation (ICC). Symptoms with good ICC ranging from 0.60 to 0.74 included inflated self-esteem/grandiosity and decreased need for sleep. Diagnoses and episodes with poor ICCs (< 0.4) included Hypomania and Bipolar Not Elsewhere Classified/Not Otherwise Specified. Despite efforts made to refine BD criteria with DSM-5, there was substantive variation in diagnostic interpretation among investigators working with children presenting with manic-like symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年双相情感障碍的症状和诊断专家评分协议。
幼儿双相情感障碍(BD)的诊断一直是一个有争议的话题,部分原因是对躁狂样症状的不同解释。我们研究了参与儿童双相生物库的专家学术临床医生在他们对精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM)标准和诊断的解释和应用方面的差异。研究人员回顾了12种标准化的叙述,并为每一种叙述标记了视觉模拟量表,表明他们对躁狂发作的存在和标准的信心。我们使用类间相关性(ICC)分析了评级者的置信度和评级者之间的一致性。ICC在0.60到0.74之间的良好症状包括自尊膨胀/浮夸和睡眠需求减少。不良icc的诊断和发作(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Predictive Value of Preadolescent Suicidal Ideation Reporter Discrepancies in the ABCD Study. Expert Rater Agreement for Symptoms and Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in Youth. Heterogeneity in Developmental Trajectories of Internalizing and Externalizing Symptomatology: Associations with Risk and Protective Factors. Impact of Positive Childhood Experiences (PCEs): A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. Training Community Clinicians in Implementing CBT-ERP for Youth with OCD: A Pilot Study in Australian Community Mental Health Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1