Trends in Cervical Laminoplasty Incidence in the United States: A Comparison of Commercial Insurance, Medicare, and Device Manufacturer Databases.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001729
Prashant V Rajan, Kevin Heo, John G Heller, Sangwook Tim Yoon
{"title":"Trends in Cervical Laminoplasty Incidence in the United States: A Comparison of Commercial Insurance, Medicare, and Device Manufacturer Databases.","authors":"Prashant V Rajan, Kevin Heo, John G Heller, Sangwook Tim Yoon","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective database study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To leverage a commercial insurance claims database to explore trends in laminoplasty utilization and reimbursement in the United States. Secondarily, volume estimates were compared with data from the industry and from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>With purported benefits of motion preservation and lower complication rates than fusion, cervical laminoplasty is an important surgical technique. However, current commercial database studies suggest that laminoplasty adoption in the United States has been slow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was the total volume of laminoplasty procedures performed in the United States per year. Truven, a large commercial insurance claims database, was used to estimate laminoplasty volume from 2009 to 2019. Volume estimates for posterior cervical fusions were also generated as a comparator. Reimbursement data for laminoplasty adjusted for inflation were also generated. Trends in national procedural volumes and reimbursement over time were assessed with the Pearson correlation test. CMS Part B national summary statistics from 2000 to 2022 and market data from laminoplasty device manufacturers from 2017 to 2024 were qualitatively compared with volume estimates from Truven.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Truven volume of laminoplasty remained stable throughout the study period with an estimated annual volume of 944-1590 cases. Posterior cervical fusion volume was much higher, ranging from 7930 to 11,874 cases with increased trend. When compared qualitatively, Truven volume estimates were similar to those from CMS data, although industry volume estimates were comparatively higher (estimated total volume of 8352-11,428 cases). There was no statistically significant trend in Truven reimbursement values for laminoplasty from 2009 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Industry market data suggest more laminoplasty procedures are being performed nationally than what is estimated by commercial/CMS databases. This suggests possible growth in laminoplasty usage, given purported advantages to fusion in the properly indicated patient, and possibly calls into question the epidemiological accuracy of commercial claims databases.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV-Retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective database study.

Objective: To leverage a commercial insurance claims database to explore trends in laminoplasty utilization and reimbursement in the United States. Secondarily, volume estimates were compared with data from the industry and from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS).

Summary of background data: With purported benefits of motion preservation and lower complication rates than fusion, cervical laminoplasty is an important surgical technique. However, current commercial database studies suggest that laminoplasty adoption in the United States has been slow.

Methods: The primary outcome was the total volume of laminoplasty procedures performed in the United States per year. Truven, a large commercial insurance claims database, was used to estimate laminoplasty volume from 2009 to 2019. Volume estimates for posterior cervical fusions were also generated as a comparator. Reimbursement data for laminoplasty adjusted for inflation were also generated. Trends in national procedural volumes and reimbursement over time were assessed with the Pearson correlation test. CMS Part B national summary statistics from 2000 to 2022 and market data from laminoplasty device manufacturers from 2017 to 2024 were qualitatively compared with volume estimates from Truven.

Results: Truven volume of laminoplasty remained stable throughout the study period with an estimated annual volume of 944-1590 cases. Posterior cervical fusion volume was much higher, ranging from 7930 to 11,874 cases with increased trend. When compared qualitatively, Truven volume estimates were similar to those from CMS data, although industry volume estimates were comparatively higher (estimated total volume of 8352-11,428 cases). There was no statistically significant trend in Truven reimbursement values for laminoplasty from 2009 to 2019.

Conclusions: Industry market data suggest more laminoplasty procedures are being performed nationally than what is estimated by commercial/CMS databases. This suggests possible growth in laminoplasty usage, given purported advantages to fusion in the properly indicated patient, and possibly calls into question the epidemiological accuracy of commercial claims databases.

Level of evidence: IV-Retrospective study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国颈椎椎板成形术发生率的趋势:商业保险、医疗保险和器械制造商数据库的比较。
研究设计:回顾性数据库研究。目的:利用商业保险索赔数据库探讨椎板成形术在美国的应用和报销趋势。其次,将数量估计值与行业以及医疗保险和医疗补助中心(CMS)的数据进行比较。背景资料总结:颈椎椎板成形术是一项重要的手术技术,具有运动保持和比融合低并发症的优点。然而,目前的商业数据库研究表明,椎板成形术在美国的应用进展缓慢。方法:主要结果是每年在美国进行的椎板成形术的总量。Truven是一个大型商业保险索赔数据库,用于估计2009年至2019年的椎板成形术量。后颈椎融合的体积估计也作为比较。还生成了经通货膨胀调整的椎板成形术的报销数据。使用Pearson相关检验评估了国家手术量和报销随时间的趋势。CMS B部分2000年至2022年的国家汇总统计数据和2017年至2024年椎板成形术设备制造商的市场数据与Truven的数量估计进行了定性比较。结果:椎板成形术的真实体积在整个研究期间保持稳定,估计每年的体积为944-1590例。颈椎后路融合量高得多,有增加趋势的病例从7930例到11874例不等。定性比较时,Truven的数量估计值与CMS数据的估计值相似,尽管行业数量估计值相对较高(估计总量为8352- 11428例)。从2009年到2019年,椎板成形术的Truven报销值没有统计学上的显著趋势。结论:行业市场数据显示,全国范围内椎板成形术的实施比商业/CMS数据库估计的要多。这表明椎板成形术的使用可能会增加,因为在适当指示的患者中融合具有据称的优势,并且可能引起对商业索赔数据库的流行病学准确性的质疑。证据等级:iv级回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Single-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability, a 2-year Follow-up Study. Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Hip Displacement Following Spinal Fusion in Nonambulant Patients With Spastic Neuromuscular Scoliosis. A Correlation Among the Most Classic Axis Injuries Classification and the New AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System. Fusion Outcomes of GLP-1 Agonist Therapy in Multilevel Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1