Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Research Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s13550-024-01190-7
Jan Heilinger, Katrin Sabine Roth, Henning Weis, Antonis Fink, Jasmin Weindler, Felix Dietlein, Philipp Krapf, Klaus Schomäcker, Bernd Neumaier, Markus Dietlein, Alexander Drzezga, Carsten Kobe
{"title":"Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy.","authors":"Jan Heilinger, Katrin Sabine Roth, Henning Weis, Antonis Fink, Jasmin Weindler, Felix Dietlein, Philipp Krapf, Klaus Schomäcker, Bernd Neumaier, Markus Dietlein, Alexander Drzezga, Carsten Kobe","doi":"10.1186/s13550-024-01190-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, several radiopharmaceuticals are used for PSMA-PET imaging, each with distinct biodistribution patterns. This may impact treatment decisions and outcomes, as eligibility for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is usually assessed by comparing tumoral uptake to normal liver uptake as a reference. In this study, we aimed to compare tracer uptake intraindividually in various reference regions including liver, parotid gland and spleen as well as the respective tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of different <sup>18</sup>F-labeled PSMA ligands to today's standard radiopharmaceutical <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 in a series of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who underwent a dual PSMA-PET examination as part of an individualized diagnostic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in background activity among different PSMA-PET tracers lead to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). In [<sup>18</sup>F]F-DCFPyL-PET, TBR with the liver as the reference organ (TBR<sub>liver</sub>) was comparable to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET, while [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [<sup>18</sup>F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET showed significantly lower values. Using the parotid gland as the reference (TBR<sub>parotidgland</sub>), [<sup>18</sup>F]F-DCFPyL-PET exhibited significantly higher values, whereas [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [<sup>18</sup>F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET were comparable. For the spleen (TBR<sub>spleen</sub>), [<sup>18</sup>F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET was comparable, but [<sup>18</sup>F]F-DCFPyL-PET and [<sup>18</sup>F]F-PSMA-1007-PET showed significantly higher and lower values, respectively. An additional Bland-Altman analyses revealed low bias for [<sup>18</sup>F]F-DCFPyL-PET in TBR<sub>parotidgland</sub>, whereas significant differences in TBR<sub>liver</sub> and TBR<sub>spleen</sub> for the other tracers resulted in higher bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different PSMA-PET tracers exhibit distinct biodistribution patterns, leading to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) in reference organs such as the liver, parotid gland, and spleen. Patient selection for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is currently based on a semiquantitative approach using the liver as a reference region in [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET. Thus, the use of alternative [<sup>18</sup>F]-labeled tracers may result in under- or overestimation of a patient's suitability for therapy. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the differences in tracer-specific uptake behavior for accurate decisions regarding PSMA-expression levels. However, as the patient cohort in this study is at earlier disease stages, the generalizability of these findings to later-stage patients remains unclear and requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01190-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, several radiopharmaceuticals are used for PSMA-PET imaging, each with distinct biodistribution patterns. This may impact treatment decisions and outcomes, as eligibility for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is usually assessed by comparing tumoral uptake to normal liver uptake as a reference. In this study, we aimed to compare tracer uptake intraindividually in various reference regions including liver, parotid gland and spleen as well as the respective tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of different 18F-labeled PSMA ligands to today's standard radiopharmaceutical 68Ga-PSMA-11 in a series of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who underwent a dual PSMA-PET examination as part of an individualized diagnostic approach.

Results: Differences in background activity among different PSMA-PET tracers lead to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). In [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET, TBR with the liver as the reference organ (TBRliver) was comparable to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET, while [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET showed significantly lower values. Using the parotid gland as the reference (TBRparotidgland), [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET exhibited significantly higher values, whereas [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET were comparable. For the spleen (TBRspleen), [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET was comparable, but [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET and [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET showed significantly higher and lower values, respectively. An additional Bland-Altman analyses revealed low bias for [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET in TBRparotidgland, whereas significant differences in TBRliver and TBRspleen for the other tracers resulted in higher bias.

Conclusion: Different PSMA-PET tracers exhibit distinct biodistribution patterns, leading to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) in reference organs such as the liver, parotid gland, and spleen. Patient selection for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is currently based on a semiquantitative approach using the liver as a reference region in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET. Thus, the use of alternative [18F]-labeled tracers may result in under- or overestimation of a patient's suitability for therapy. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the differences in tracer-specific uptake behavior for accurate decisions regarding PSMA-expression levels. However, as the patient cohort in this study is at earlier disease stages, the generalizability of these findings to later-stage patients remains unclear and requires further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你知道你的psma示踪剂吗?不同PSMA配体生物分布的可变性及其对PSMA靶向治疗前确定PSMA阳性的潜在影响。
背景:在临床实践中,几种放射性药物被用于PSMA-PET成像,每种药物都有不同的生物分布模式。这可能会影响治疗决策和结果,因为psma定向放射配体治疗的资格通常是通过比较肿瘤摄取和正常肝脏摄取作为参考来评估的。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较不同参考区域(包括肝脏、腮腺和脾脏)的个体内示踪剂摄取,以及不同18f标记的PSMA配体与当今标准放射性药物68Ga-PSMA-11的各自肿瘤与背景比(TBR),这些患者接受了双重PSMA- pet检查,作为个体化诊断方法的一部分。结果:不同PSMA-PET示踪剂的背景活性差异导致肿瘤与背景比(TBR)的变化。在[18F]F-DCFPyL-PET中,以肝脏为参比器官的TBR (TBRliver)与[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET相当,而[18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET和[18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET值明显低于[18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET。以腮腺为参照(tbrpartidgland), [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET的值明显高于[18F] f - pma -1007- pet和[18F] f - jk - pma -7- pet。对于脾脏(tbr脾脏),[18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET具有可比性,但[18F]F-DCFPyL-PET和[18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET分别具有显著的高、低值。另一项Bland-Altman分析显示,[18F]F-DCFPyL-PET在tbrpartidgland中的偏倚较低,而其他示踪剂在TBRliver和tbr脾脏中的显著差异导致偏倚较高。结论:不同的PSMA-PET示踪剂表现出不同的生物分布模式,导致参考器官(如肝脏、腮腺和脾脏)肿瘤与背景比(TBR)的变化。目前,psma定向放射配体治疗的患者选择基于半定量方法,使用肝脏作为[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET的参考区域。因此,使用替代[18F]标记的示踪剂可能会导致对患者治疗适用性的低估或高估。这突出了全面了解示踪剂特异性摄取行为的差异对于准确决定psma表达水平的重要性。然而,由于本研究的患者队列处于早期疾病阶段,这些发现是否适用于晚期患者尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
期刊最新文献
Venous blood sampling for less invasive in vivo quantification of synaptic density with constant infusion of [18F]SynVesT-1 and PET. Value of multi-parameter 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. 68Ga-NOTA-RM26 PET/CT in the evaluation of glioma: a pilot prospective study. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for the assessment of therapeutic outcomes following superselective adrenal arterial embolization in patients with primary aldosteronism. Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1