Amend the Mental Health Care Act 2017: A Survey of Indian psychiatrists (Part 2).

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Indian Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-16 DOI:10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_812_24
Savita Malhotra, Shruti Srivastava, K P Jayaprakashan, Mahesh R Gowda, Nidhi Sharma, Mohan R Gopalan, Vidyadhar G Watve, Imon Paul
{"title":"Amend the Mental Health Care Act 2017: A Survey of Indian psychiatrists (Part 2).","authors":"Savita Malhotra, Shruti Srivastava, K P Jayaprakashan, Mahesh R Gowda, Nidhi Sharma, Mohan R Gopalan, Vidyadhar G Watve, Imon Paul","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_812_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information about the experience of practicing psychiatrists with the use of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA), 2017, India, after 5 years of its promulgation has not been available.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study was carried out to understand the experience of the practicing psychiatrists in using and complying with the MHCA 2017 and to bring out the problems and suggested reforms, if any, in various provisions of the MHCA 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey by practicing psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society on the various sections and provisions of the MHCA 17 was carried out through structured and open-ended responses. This paper presents the qualitative analysis of the open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 600 respondents, who gave a total of 1239 (range 116-154) responses to eight open-ended questions about various provisions of the MHCA. Qualitative analysis revealed that most respondents opined for keeping the General Hospital Psychiatry units exempted from inclusion as the mental health establishment, thus treating physical illness at par with the mental illness; a separate stand-alone law for mental illness perpetuates stigma, asked for a larger representation of psychiatrists in the State Mental Health Authority and Mental Health Review Boards. Most respondents opined that the provisions of capacity assessment, nominated representative, and advance directive are a hinderance in treatment and should be amended; treating psychiatrists and family/caregiver's consent should suffice for supported admission, just like in other disciplines of medicine; and MHCA 2017 needs major amendments/repeal to make it convenient for patient care. Any unauthorized places/centers where persons with mental illness are kept should come under regulatory control of the state mental health authorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey has highlighted several deficiencies and operational difficulties in the current Act that hinder the delivery of mental health care to patients with mental illness in the country and need amendments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"66 11","pages":"1024-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11708964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_812_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Information about the experience of practicing psychiatrists with the use of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA), 2017, India, after 5 years of its promulgation has not been available.

Aim: The present study was carried out to understand the experience of the practicing psychiatrists in using and complying with the MHCA 2017 and to bring out the problems and suggested reforms, if any, in various provisions of the MHCA 2017.

Methods: An online survey by practicing psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society on the various sections and provisions of the MHCA 17 was carried out through structured and open-ended responses. This paper presents the qualitative analysis of the open-ended responses.

Results: There were 600 respondents, who gave a total of 1239 (range 116-154) responses to eight open-ended questions about various provisions of the MHCA. Qualitative analysis revealed that most respondents opined for keeping the General Hospital Psychiatry units exempted from inclusion as the mental health establishment, thus treating physical illness at par with the mental illness; a separate stand-alone law for mental illness perpetuates stigma, asked for a larger representation of psychiatrists in the State Mental Health Authority and Mental Health Review Boards. Most respondents opined that the provisions of capacity assessment, nominated representative, and advance directive are a hinderance in treatment and should be amended; treating psychiatrists and family/caregiver's consent should suffice for supported admission, just like in other disciplines of medicine; and MHCA 2017 needs major amendments/repeal to make it convenient for patient care. Any unauthorized places/centers where persons with mental illness are kept should come under regulatory control of the state mental health authorities.

Conclusion: The survey has highlighted several deficiencies and operational difficulties in the current Act that hinder the delivery of mental health care to patients with mental illness in the country and need amendments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订《2017年精神保健法》:印度精神科医生调查(第二部分)。
背景:在印度2017年《精神卫生保健法》(MHCA)颁布5年后,关于精神科医生使用该法的经验的信息尚未获得。目的:本研究旨在了解执业精神科医生在使用和遵守MHCA 2017方面的经验,并提出MHCA 2017各条款中存在的问题和改革建议。方法:印度精神病学学会的执业精神科医生通过结构化和开放式的回答对mhca17的各个部分和条款进行了在线调查。本文对开放式回答进行了定性分析。结果:有600名受访者,他们对有关MHCA各种规定的八个开放式问题给出了总共1239个(范围116-154)个回答。定性分析显示,大多数答复者认为应将综合医院精神病科排除在精神卫生机构之外,从而将身体疾病与精神疾病同等对待;一项针对精神疾病的独立法律使耻辱永久化,要求精神病医生在国家精神卫生管理局和精神卫生审查委员会中有更多的代表。大多数被调查者认为能力评估、指定代表和预先指示的规定是对治疗的阻碍,应予以修改;就像其他医学学科一样,治疗精神科医生和家人/照顾者的同意应该足以支持住院;MHCA 2017需要进行重大修订/废除,以方便患者护理。任何未经批准关押精神病患者的场所/中心都应受到州精神卫生当局的监管。结论:调查突出了现行法案中的一些缺陷和操作困难,这些缺陷和困难阻碍了向国内精神病患者提供精神保健,需要进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.
期刊最新文献
Amend the Mental Health Care Act 2017: A Survey of Indian psychiatrists (Part 2). Amisulpride-induced myoclonus: A unique tardive syndrome. Diagnostic overshadowing in psychiatry: A case report. Effects of aerobic training on brain architecture, hippocampal volume, cardiorespiratory parameters, and health-related quality of life among patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review. Efficacy of brief cognitive behavior therapy in improving symptoms, functioning, and adherence to treatment in patients with bipolar disorder in remission: A randomized control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1