Lucia Perez-Lamas, Jose Sandoval-Sus, Julio C Chavez
{"title":"Should CAR-T cell therapy be considered a standard of care for patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in second line treatment?","authors":"Lucia Perez-Lamas, Jose Sandoval-Sus, Julio C Chavez","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2451888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CAR-T therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article reviews the existing evidence for using CAR-T therapy as a second-line treatment. Two major phase 3 trials, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM, have shown that axi-cel and liso-cel, respectively, offer superior outcomes compared to historical standard chemoimmunotherapy and consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Additionally, two promising phase 2 trials, PILOT and ALYCANTE, demonstrated the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients who are ineligible for auto-HCT. We also reviewed the potential biological factors behind these results.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Several factors support the use of CAR-T therapy in earlier treatment lines: better T-cell fitness in the infused product, reduced systemic inflammation in patients, and a more favorable tumor microenvironment. Although real-world data for second-line CAR-T therapy is still early, it is expected that CAR-T will be used more widely. Additional focus highlights the need for defining suitable patient populations and the efforts to enhance accessibility and cost-effectiveness of this groundbreaking treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2451888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: CAR-T therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL).
Areas covered: This article reviews the existing evidence for using CAR-T therapy as a second-line treatment. Two major phase 3 trials, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM, have shown that axi-cel and liso-cel, respectively, offer superior outcomes compared to historical standard chemoimmunotherapy and consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Additionally, two promising phase 2 trials, PILOT and ALYCANTE, demonstrated the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients who are ineligible for auto-HCT. We also reviewed the potential biological factors behind these results.
Expert opinion: Several factors support the use of CAR-T therapy in earlier treatment lines: better T-cell fitness in the infused product, reduced systemic inflammation in patients, and a more favorable tumor microenvironment. Although real-world data for second-line CAR-T therapy is still early, it is expected that CAR-T will be used more widely. Additional focus highlights the need for defining suitable patient populations and the efforts to enhance accessibility and cost-effectiveness of this groundbreaking treatment approach.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.