Should CAR-T cell therapy be considered a standard of care for patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in second line treatment?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2451888
Lucia Perez-Lamas, Jose Sandoval-Sus, Julio C Chavez
{"title":"Should CAR-T cell therapy be considered a standard of care for patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in second line treatment?","authors":"Lucia Perez-Lamas, Jose Sandoval-Sus, Julio C Chavez","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2451888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CAR-T therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article reviews the existing evidence for using CAR-T therapy as a second-line treatment. Two major phase 3 trials, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM, have shown that axi-cel and liso-cel, respectively, offer superior outcomes compared to historical standard chemoimmunotherapy and consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Additionally, two promising phase 2 trials, PILOT and ALYCANTE, demonstrated the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients who are ineligible for auto-HCT. We also reviewed the potential biological factors behind these results.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Several factors support the use of CAR-T therapy in earlier treatment lines: better T-cell fitness in the infused product, reduced systemic inflammation in patients, and a more favorable tumor microenvironment. Although real-world data for second-line CAR-T therapy is still early, it is expected that CAR-T will be used more widely. Additional focus highlights the need for defining suitable patient populations and the efforts to enhance accessibility and cost-effectiveness of this groundbreaking treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2451888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: CAR-T therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL).

Areas covered: This article reviews the existing evidence for using CAR-T therapy as a second-line treatment. Two major phase 3 trials, ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM, have shown that axi-cel and liso-cel, respectively, offer superior outcomes compared to historical standard chemoimmunotherapy and consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Additionally, two promising phase 2 trials, PILOT and ALYCANTE, demonstrated the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients who are ineligible for auto-HCT. We also reviewed the potential biological factors behind these results.

Expert opinion: Several factors support the use of CAR-T therapy in earlier treatment lines: better T-cell fitness in the infused product, reduced systemic inflammation in patients, and a more favorable tumor microenvironment. Although real-world data for second-line CAR-T therapy is still early, it is expected that CAR-T will be used more widely. Additional focus highlights the need for defining suitable patient populations and the efforts to enhance accessibility and cost-effectiveness of this groundbreaking treatment approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAR-T细胞疗法应该被认为是难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤二线治疗的标准治疗吗?
CAR-T疗法已经改变了复发/难治性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗前景。涵盖领域:本文回顾了将CAR-T疗法作为二线治疗的现有证据。两项主要的3期试验,ZUMA-7和TRANSFORM,分别表明,与历史标准的化学免疫治疗和自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HCT)巩固相比,轴细胞和liso- cell提供了更好的结果。此外,两项有前景的2期试验PILOT和ALYCANTE证明了CAR-T疗法对不符合auto-HCT条件的患者的疗效。我们还回顾了这些结果背后的潜在生物学因素。专家意见:有几个因素支持在早期治疗中使用CAR-T疗法:输注产品中更好的t细胞适应性,减少患者的全身炎症,以及更有利的肿瘤微环境。尽管二线CAR-T疗法的实际数据仍处于早期阶段,但预计CAR-T疗法将得到更广泛的应用。另外,重点强调需要确定合适的患者群体,并努力提高这种突破性治疗方法的可及性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
How should we approach salvage therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma after first-line immunotherapy combinations? An evaluation of mepolizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma. Treating episodic migraine with precision: the evolving landscape of targeted therapies driven by insights in disease biology. Should CAR-T cell therapy be considered a standard of care for patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in second line treatment? The potential of antibody-drug conjugates for effective therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1