The association between HALP score and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2451079
Taha Koray Sahin, Deniz Can Guven, Mert Durukan, Onur Baş, Yunus Kaygusuz, Zafer Arik, Omer Dizdar, Mustafa Erman, Suayib Yalcin, Sercan Aksoy
{"title":"The association between HALP score and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Taha Koray Sahin, Deniz Can Guven, Mert Durukan, Onur Baş, Yunus Kaygusuz, Zafer Arik, Omer Dizdar, Mustafa Erman, Suayib Yalcin, Sercan Aksoy","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2451079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancer as a reflector of nutritional and inflammatory status, although the data is limited in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we sought to investigate the relationship between HALP score and survival in ICI-treated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included adult patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs between June 2016 and January 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to identify the optimal HALP score cutoff point for survival prediction. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to create survival curves, and Cox regression was employed for multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 456 patients were included. The median age was 62 years, and 64.7% were male. The optimal HALP cutoff value for survival prediction was 22.8 in ROC analyses (AUC: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.570-0.679, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with low HALP scores had significantly shorter OS (HR: 1.394, 95% CI: 1.077-1.805, <i>p</i> = 0.012) and PFS (HR: 1.388, 95% CI: 1.129-1.706, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results pointed out the possible use of the HALP score as a prognostic marker in ICI-treated patients. If validated in prospective cohorts, the HALP score could enhance prognosis prediction in ICI-treated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2451079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancer as a reflector of nutritional and inflammatory status, although the data is limited in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we sought to investigate the relationship between HALP score and survival in ICI-treated patients.

Methods: We included adult patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs between June 2016 and January 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to identify the optimal HALP score cutoff point for survival prediction. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to create survival curves, and Cox regression was employed for multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 456 patients were included. The median age was 62 years, and 64.7% were male. The optimal HALP cutoff value for survival prediction was 22.8 in ROC analyses (AUC: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.570-0.679, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with low HALP scores had significantly shorter OS (HR: 1.394, 95% CI: 1.077-1.805, p = 0.012) and PFS (HR: 1.388, 95% CI: 1.129-1.706, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Our study results pointed out the possible use of the HALP score as a prognostic marker in ICI-treated patients. If validated in prospective cohorts, the HALP score could enhance prognosis prediction in ICI-treated patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Practical insights into bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma. Anticancer properties of histone deacetylase inhibitors - what is their potential? Current and emerging treatment options for BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. The association between HALP score and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Role of locoregional therapy including liver transplantation in liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer: a review paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1