Skiing quality analysis of recreational skiers based on IMU data and self-assessment.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1495176
Christina Kranzinger, Stefan Kranzinger, Eva Hollauf, Harald Rieser, Thomas Stöggl
{"title":"Skiing quality analysis of recreational skiers based on IMU data and self-assessment.","authors":"Christina Kranzinger, Stefan Kranzinger, Eva Hollauf, Harald Rieser, Thomas Stöggl","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1495176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alpine skiing is a popular sport in many countries and holds benefits in terms of health and well-being. At the same time alpine skiing is associated with a certain risk of accidents caused, among other things, by overestimating one's own skiing skills. Self-assessment of skiing skills is not trivial. Therefore, feedback modalities can be assistive. One feasible option to provide skiers with feedback on their skiing ability are Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). The aim of this study was to analyse the skiing quality of recreational skiers based on IMU data, collected with the Connected Boot sensor system with a living lab approach to investigate whether the skiing quality score delivers reasonable results for recreational skiers. The system has been developed with expert skiers and so far has not been validated with recreational skiers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether the objective skiing quality score of the Connected Boot corresponds to the self-assessed carving ability and to analyse changes in the assessment before and after the study. In total, data from 62 participants who skied with the sensor system were analysed. At the beginning and the end of the study the participants additionally received questionnaires to assess their skiing skills. The results show that there was a strong correlation between the self-reported carving ability and the skiing quality score of the Connected Boot and that the self-reported carving ability before the study was around 1.71 points higher than the algorithm-based skiing quality score. Interestingly, the correlation was higher for female compared to male participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1495176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1495176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alpine skiing is a popular sport in many countries and holds benefits in terms of health and well-being. At the same time alpine skiing is associated with a certain risk of accidents caused, among other things, by overestimating one's own skiing skills. Self-assessment of skiing skills is not trivial. Therefore, feedback modalities can be assistive. One feasible option to provide skiers with feedback on their skiing ability are Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). The aim of this study was to analyse the skiing quality of recreational skiers based on IMU data, collected with the Connected Boot sensor system with a living lab approach to investigate whether the skiing quality score delivers reasonable results for recreational skiers. The system has been developed with expert skiers and so far has not been validated with recreational skiers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether the objective skiing quality score of the Connected Boot corresponds to the self-assessed carving ability and to analyse changes in the assessment before and after the study. In total, data from 62 participants who skied with the sensor system were analysed. At the beginning and the end of the study the participants additionally received questionnaires to assess their skiing skills. The results show that there was a strong correlation between the self-reported carving ability and the skiing quality score of the Connected Boot and that the self-reported carving ability before the study was around 1.71 points higher than the algorithm-based skiing quality score. Interestingly, the correlation was higher for female compared to male participants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于IMU数据和自我评价的休闲滑雪者滑雪质量分析。
高山滑雪在许多国家都是一项很受欢迎的运动,对健康和幸福都有好处。与此同时,高山滑雪有一定的事故风险,其中包括高估自己的滑雪技术。对滑雪技能的自我评估并非微不足道。因此,反馈模式可以是辅助的。为滑雪者提供滑雪能力反馈的一个可行选择是惯性测量单元(imu)。本研究的目的是基于IMU数据分析休闲滑雪者的滑雪质量,这些数据是由Connected Boot传感器系统收集的,采用生活实验室的方法来调查滑雪质量评分是否为休闲滑雪者提供了合理的结果。该系统是由专业滑雪者开发的,到目前为止还没有经过休闲滑雪者的验证。因此,我们的目的是调查Connected Boot的客观滑雪质量评分是否与自我评估的雕刻能力相对应,并分析研究前后评估的变化。总共分析了62名使用传感器系统滑雪的参与者的数据。在研究开始和结束时,参与者还收到了评估他们滑雪技能的问卷。结果表明,自我报告的雕刻能力与Connected Boot的滑雪质量得分之间存在很强的相关性,研究前的自我报告雕刻能力比基于算法的滑雪质量得分高出1.71分左右。有趣的是,与男性参与者相比,女性参与者的相关性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting small to feel big: the psychology of weight cutting in combat sports. Strength and dynamic balance performance in soccer players in the United States: age, sex, and bilateral differences. An 8-week physical exercise intervention for e'athletes improves physical performance rather than short-term esports performance parameters - a randomized controlled trial. The effects of weather on physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults. Editorial: Physical activity, sports and health: reflections and challenges based on sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1