Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4761
Katelyn A Berg, Jack H Noble, Benoit M Dawant, Linsey W Sunderhaus, Andrea J DeFreese, Robert F Labadie, René H Gifford
{"title":"Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception.","authors":"Katelyn A Berg, Jack H Noble, Benoit M Dawant, Linsey W Sunderhaus, Andrea J DeFreese, Robert F Labadie, René H Gifford","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain variable. Image-guided cochlear implant programming has emerged as a potential programming strategy for increasing the quality of spectral information delivered through the cochlear implant to improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform 2 experiments, the first of which modeled the variance in music perception scores as a function of electrode positioning factors, and the second of which evaluated image-guided cochlear implant programming as a strategy to improve music perception with a cochlear implant.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This single-center, prospective study recruited 50 adult patients with at least 6 months of cochlear implant listening experience and normal cochlear anatomy to participate in experiment 1 from 2013 to 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January to February 2024. Thirty-four of the 50 patients from experiment 1 also completed experiment 2.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Cochlear implant programming using a computed tomography-guided electrode selection strategy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music score, including subtests of pitch discrimination thresholds, isochronous familiar melody recognition, and timbre recognition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50 participants, 20 (40%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 57.7 (16.4) years. Experiment 1 suggested that better music perception abilities in the 50 participants were associated with patients who were younger and had a postlingual onset of deafness, as well as electrode arrays with a full scala tympani insertion, higher modiolar distance, and shallower insertion depth. Experiment 2 suggested improvements in melody recognition in the 34 participants using the image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Patients with apical electrodes that were deactivated were more likely to demonstrate an improvement in their pitch perception thresholds with the image-guided strategy, likely due to the low-frequency stimuli used in the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study identified patient and device factors that were associated with music perception outcomes with a cochlear implant. These findings suggest that a personalized, image-guided approach to programming may improve music perception abilities for patients with cochlear implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain variable. Image-guided cochlear implant programming has emerged as a potential programming strategy for increasing the quality of spectral information delivered through the cochlear implant to improve outcomes.

Objectives: To perform 2 experiments, the first of which modeled the variance in music perception scores as a function of electrode positioning factors, and the second of which evaluated image-guided cochlear implant programming as a strategy to improve music perception with a cochlear implant.

Design, setting, and participants: This single-center, prospective study recruited 50 adult patients with at least 6 months of cochlear implant listening experience and normal cochlear anatomy to participate in experiment 1 from 2013 to 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January to February 2024. Thirty-four of the 50 patients from experiment 1 also completed experiment 2.

Interventions: Cochlear implant programming using a computed tomography-guided electrode selection strategy.

Main outcomes and measures: University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music score, including subtests of pitch discrimination thresholds, isochronous familiar melody recognition, and timbre recognition.

Results: Of 50 participants, 20 (40%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 57.7 (16.4) years. Experiment 1 suggested that better music perception abilities in the 50 participants were associated with patients who were younger and had a postlingual onset of deafness, as well as electrode arrays with a full scala tympani insertion, higher modiolar distance, and shallower insertion depth. Experiment 2 suggested improvements in melody recognition in the 34 participants using the image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy. Patients with apical electrodes that were deactivated were more likely to demonstrate an improvement in their pitch perception thresholds with the image-guided strategy, likely due to the low-frequency stimuli used in the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music.

Conclusions and relevance: This study identified patient and device factors that were associated with music perception outcomes with a cochlear implant. These findings suggest that a personalized, image-guided approach to programming may improve music perception abilities for patients with cochlear implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工耳蜗电极放置与音乐感知。
重要性:人工耳蜗可以改善语音感知,但音乐感知的结果仍然是可变的。图像引导人工耳蜗编程已成为一种潜在的编程策略,用于提高通过人工耳蜗传递的频谱信息的质量,以改善结果。目的:进行两个实验,第一个实验将音乐感知得分的方差建模为电极定位因素的函数,第二个实验评估图像引导人工耳蜗编程作为一种改善人工耳蜗音乐感知的策略。设计、环境和参与者:这项单中心前瞻性研究招募了50名具有至少6个月人工耳蜗听力经验且耳蜗解剖正常的成年患者,于2013年至2023年参加实验1。数据分析时间为2024年1 - 2月。实验1的50名患者中有34人也完成了实验2。干预:人工耳蜗植入程序使用计算机断层扫描引导电极选择策略。主要结果和测量:华盛顿大学音乐评分临床评估,包括音高辨别阈值、等时熟悉旋律识别和音色识别的子测试。结果:50例患者中,女性20例(40%),平均(SD)年龄为57.7(16.4)岁。实验1表明,50名参与者中较好的音乐感知能力与年龄更小、语后耳聋的患者有关,也与全阶鼓室插入、高模摩尔距离和浅插入深度的电极阵列有关。实验2表明,使用图像引导人工耳蜗编程策略,34名参与者的旋律识别能力有所提高。在华盛顿大学临床音乐评估中,使用低频刺激的患者在使用图像引导策略时,顶端电极被停用的患者更有可能在音高感知阈值方面表现出改善。结论和相关性:本研究确定了与人工耳蜗音乐感知结果相关的患者和设备因素。这些发现表明,个性化的、图像引导的编程方法可能会提高人工耳蜗患者的音乐感知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
期刊最新文献
Back to the Workforce-An Important Marker of Survivorship. Concerns Regarding Mouth Closure and Airflow in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Concerns Regarding Mouth Closure and Airflow in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Reply. Errors in Table and Figures. Manual Therapy for Fibrosis-Related Late Effect Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: The MANTLE Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1