Validation of Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) Scores to Predict Critical Events in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1177/08850666241307630
Colleen M Badke, Austin Wang, Latasha A Daniels, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
{"title":"Validation of Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) Scores to Predict Critical Events in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Colleen M Badke, Austin Wang, Latasha A Daniels, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto","doi":"10.1177/08850666241307630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prognostic value of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) to discriminate critical events, including code events and intubations, in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational cohort study of all critical events in a quaternary care PICU between 5/2020 and 4/2023. Critical events were extracted from our hospital communications platform and from the electronic health record (EHR). The pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) scores were prospectively calculated in real-time in our EHR every 15 min during the study period for data-driven situational awareness and were retrospectively analyzed for this study. Each encounter was divided into 6-h time blocks and we assessed the performance of the highest pSOFA score in each block at discriminating the occurrence of a critical event in the subsequent block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5687 unique patient encounters included in the analysis. Critical events were identified in 578 out of 169 486 time blocks (prevalence 0.3%), which included 103 code events and 498 intubation events, in 392 unique PICU encounters. The total pSOFA score in a 6-h time block was significantly associated with a subsequent code event (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.13-1.24) or intubation (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10-1.15). Several organ-specific pSOFA subscores were also significantly associated with the outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the total pSOFA score was 0.67 for a code event and 0.65 for intubation. Using a pSOFA score cutoff of ≥8, the positive predictive value was 0.8% and the negative predictive value was 99.7% for any critical event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pSOFA score is significantly associated with critical events in the PICU, however, it does not have adequate performance to be used for situational awareness by itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241307630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241307630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prognostic value of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) to discriminate critical events, including code events and intubations, in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Methods: We performed an observational cohort study of all critical events in a quaternary care PICU between 5/2020 and 4/2023. Critical events were extracted from our hospital communications platform and from the electronic health record (EHR). The pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) scores were prospectively calculated in real-time in our EHR every 15 min during the study period for data-driven situational awareness and were retrospectively analyzed for this study. Each encounter was divided into 6-h time blocks and we assessed the performance of the highest pSOFA score in each block at discriminating the occurrence of a critical event in the subsequent block.

Results: There were 5687 unique patient encounters included in the analysis. Critical events were identified in 578 out of 169 486 time blocks (prevalence 0.3%), which included 103 code events and 498 intubation events, in 392 unique PICU encounters. The total pSOFA score in a 6-h time block was significantly associated with a subsequent code event (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.13-1.24) or intubation (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10-1.15). Several organ-specific pSOFA subscores were also significantly associated with the outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the total pSOFA score was 0.67 for a code event and 0.65 for intubation. Using a pSOFA score cutoff of ≥8, the positive predictive value was 0.8% and the negative predictive value was 99.7% for any critical event.

Conclusions: The pSOFA score is significantly associated with critical events in the PICU, however, it does not have adequate performance to be used for situational awareness by itself.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童顺序器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)评分预测儿科重症监护病房关键事件的有效性验证。
目的:确定儿童序贯器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中区分关键事件(包括代码事件和插管)的预后价值。方法:我们在2020年5月至2023年4月期间进行了一项观察性队列研究,研究了第四期护理PICU的所有关键事件。从我们的医院通信平台和电子健康记录(EHR)中提取关键事件。在研究期间,我们每隔15分钟在电子病历中前瞻性地实时计算儿童顺序器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)评分,以获得数据驱动的态势感知,并对该研究进行回顾性分析。每次遭遇被划分为6小时的时间段,我们评估了每个时间段中最高pSOFA评分的表现,以区分随后时间段中关键事件的发生。结果:有5687例独特的患者遭遇纳入分析。在169 486个时间块中,有578个确定了关键事件(患病率0.3%),其中包括392次PICU独特就诊中的103个编码事件和498个插管事件。6小时内的pSOFA总评分与随后的编码事件(比值比[OR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.13-1.24)或插管(OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10-1.15)显著相关。几个器官特异性pSOFA评分也与结果显著相关。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)的总pSOFA评分为0.67编码事件和0.65插管。采用≥8分的pSOFA评分截止值,任何关键事件的阳性预测值为0.8%,阴性预测值为99.7%。结论:pSOFA评分与PICU中的关键事件显著相关,然而,它本身没有足够的性能用于态势感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
A Practical Guide to Biostatistics Used in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1