Oxygen Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1177/08850666241299378
Jack C Shapiro, Jonathan D Casey, Edward T Qian, Kevin P Seitz, Li Wang, Bradley D Lloyd, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Wesley H Self, Todd W Rice, Jonathan P Wanderer, Matthew W Semler
{"title":"Oxygen Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial.","authors":"Jack C Shapiro, Jonathan D Casey, Edward T Qian, Kevin P Seitz, Li Wang, Bradley D Lloyd, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Wesley H Self, Todd W Rice, Jonathan P Wanderer, Matthew W Semler","doi":"10.1177/08850666241299378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with sepsis frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation. How oxygenation during mechanical ventilation affects clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different oxygen saturation targets on clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis receiving mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of the <u>P</u>ragmatic <u>I</u>nvestigation of optima<u>L</u> <u>O</u>xygen <u>T</u>argets (PILOT) trial dataset among patients who met criteria for sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definition at the time of enrollment. We compared patients randomized to a lower oxygen saturation target (90%; range, 88-92%), an intermediate target (94%; range, 92-96%), and a higher target (98%; range, 96-100%) with regard to the outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days to study day 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2541 patients in the PILOT dataset, 805 patients with sepsis were included in the current analysis. In-hospital mortality by day 28 did not differ significantly between the lower target group (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 54%), the intermediate target group (50%; 95% CI, 43% to 56%), and the higher target group (51%; 95% CI, 45% to 56%) (P = 0.83). The number of ventilator-free days to day 28 did not significantly differ between the trial groups, with a mean of 9.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.8) in the lower oxygen saturation target group, 9.5 (SD, 11.2) in the intermediate group, and 9.4 (SD, 11.4) in the higher group (P = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis in a large, randomized trial, the incidence of 28-day in-hospital mortality was not statistically significantly different between the use of a lower, intermediate, or higher oxygen target. However, the confidence intervals included treatment effects that would be clinically meaningfully and further randomized trials of oxygen targets in sepsis are required.</p><p><strong>Referenced trial name: </strong>Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial (PILOT)ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241299378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241299378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with sepsis frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation. How oxygenation during mechanical ventilation affects clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis remains uncertain.

Research question: To evaluate the effects of different oxygen saturation targets on clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis receiving mechanical ventilation.

Study design and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets (PILOT) trial dataset among patients who met criteria for sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definition at the time of enrollment. We compared patients randomized to a lower oxygen saturation target (90%; range, 88-92%), an intermediate target (94%; range, 92-96%), and a higher target (98%; range, 96-100%) with regard to the outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days to study day 28.

Results: Of 2541 patients in the PILOT dataset, 805 patients with sepsis were included in the current analysis. In-hospital mortality by day 28 did not differ significantly between the lower target group (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 54%), the intermediate target group (50%; 95% CI, 43% to 56%), and the higher target group (51%; 95% CI, 45% to 56%) (P = 0.83). The number of ventilator-free days to day 28 did not significantly differ between the trial groups, with a mean of 9.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.8) in the lower oxygen saturation target group, 9.5 (SD, 11.2) in the intermediate group, and 9.4 (SD, 11.4) in the higher group (P = 0.65).

Interpretation: Among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis in a large, randomized trial, the incidence of 28-day in-hospital mortality was not statistically significantly different between the use of a lower, intermediate, or higher oxygen target. However, the confidence intervals included treatment effects that would be clinically meaningfully and further randomized trials of oxygen targets in sepsis are required.

Referenced trial name: Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial (PILOT)ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气成人脓毒症患者的氧靶:PILOT试验的二次分析。
背景:脓毒症患者经常需要有创机械通气。机械通气期间的氧合如何影响脓毒症患者的临床结果仍不确定。研究问题:评价不同血氧饱和度指标对脓毒症机械通气患者临床结局的影响。研究设计和方法:我们对在入组时符合脓毒症-3定义的脓毒症标准的患者进行了最佳氧靶实用性调查(PILOT)试验数据集的二次分析。我们比较了随机分配到较低氧饱和度目标(90%;范围,88-92%),中间目标(94%;范围,92-96%),以及更高的目标(98%;范围,96% -100%)关于28天住院死亡率和研究第28天无呼吸机天数的结果。结果:在PILOT数据集中的2541例患者中,805例脓毒症患者被纳入当前的分析。第28天的住院死亡率在低目标组之间没有显著差异(48%;95%可信区间[CI], 42% ~ 54%),中间目标组(50%;95% CI, 43%至56%),以及更高的目标群体(51%;95% CI, 45% ~ 56%) (P = 0.83)。各组无呼吸机天数至第28天无呼吸机天数无显著差异,低氧饱和度目标组平均9.9天(标准差[SD], 11.8),中等氧饱和度目标组平均9.5天(SD, 11.2),高氧饱和度目标组平均9.4天(SD, 11.4) (P = 0.65)。解释:在一项大型随机试验中,在机械通气的脓毒症患者中,使用较低、中等或较高氧靶的28天住院死亡率发生率无统计学显著差异。然而,置信区间包括具有临床意义的治疗效果,需要进一步的脓毒症氧靶点随机试验。临床试验网站:ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
A Practical Guide to Biostatistics Used in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1