Jack C Shapiro, Jonathan D Casey, Edward T Qian, Kevin P Seitz, Li Wang, Bradley D Lloyd, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Wesley H Self, Todd W Rice, Jonathan P Wanderer, Matthew W Semler
{"title":"Oxygen Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Adults with Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial.","authors":"Jack C Shapiro, Jonathan D Casey, Edward T Qian, Kevin P Seitz, Li Wang, Bradley D Lloyd, Joanna L Stollings, Robert E Freundlich, Wesley H Self, Todd W Rice, Jonathan P Wanderer, Matthew W Semler","doi":"10.1177/08850666241299378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with sepsis frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation. How oxygenation during mechanical ventilation affects clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different oxygen saturation targets on clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis receiving mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of the <u>P</u>ragmatic <u>I</u>nvestigation of optima<u>L</u> <u>O</u>xygen <u>T</u>argets (PILOT) trial dataset among patients who met criteria for sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definition at the time of enrollment. We compared patients randomized to a lower oxygen saturation target (90%; range, 88-92%), an intermediate target (94%; range, 92-96%), and a higher target (98%; range, 96-100%) with regard to the outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days to study day 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2541 patients in the PILOT dataset, 805 patients with sepsis were included in the current analysis. In-hospital mortality by day 28 did not differ significantly between the lower target group (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 54%), the intermediate target group (50%; 95% CI, 43% to 56%), and the higher target group (51%; 95% CI, 45% to 56%) (P = 0.83). The number of ventilator-free days to day 28 did not significantly differ between the trial groups, with a mean of 9.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.8) in the lower oxygen saturation target group, 9.5 (SD, 11.2) in the intermediate group, and 9.4 (SD, 11.4) in the higher group (P = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis in a large, randomized trial, the incidence of 28-day in-hospital mortality was not statistically significantly different between the use of a lower, intermediate, or higher oxygen target. However, the confidence intervals included treatment effects that would be clinically meaningfully and further randomized trials of oxygen targets in sepsis are required.</p><p><strong>Referenced trial name: </strong>Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial (PILOT)ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241299378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241299378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with sepsis frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation. How oxygenation during mechanical ventilation affects clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis remains uncertain.
Research question: To evaluate the effects of different oxygen saturation targets on clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis receiving mechanical ventilation.
Study design and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Investigation of optimaLOxygen Targets (PILOT) trial dataset among patients who met criteria for sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definition at the time of enrollment. We compared patients randomized to a lower oxygen saturation target (90%; range, 88-92%), an intermediate target (94%; range, 92-96%), and a higher target (98%; range, 96-100%) with regard to the outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days to study day 28.
Results: Of 2541 patients in the PILOT dataset, 805 patients with sepsis were included in the current analysis. In-hospital mortality by day 28 did not differ significantly between the lower target group (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 54%), the intermediate target group (50%; 95% CI, 43% to 56%), and the higher target group (51%; 95% CI, 45% to 56%) (P = 0.83). The number of ventilator-free days to day 28 did not significantly differ between the trial groups, with a mean of 9.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.8) in the lower oxygen saturation target group, 9.5 (SD, 11.2) in the intermediate group, and 9.4 (SD, 11.4) in the higher group (P = 0.65).
Interpretation: Among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis in a large, randomized trial, the incidence of 28-day in-hospital mortality was not statistically significantly different between the use of a lower, intermediate, or higher oxygen target. However, the confidence intervals included treatment effects that would be clinically meaningfully and further randomized trials of oxygen targets in sepsis are required.
Referenced trial name: Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial (PILOT)ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.