Effect of Buspirone on Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.5056/jnm24115
Zahra Mohamedali, Gehanjali Amarasinghe, Christopher W P Hopkins, Calum D Moulton
{"title":"Effect of Buspirone on Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zahra Mohamedali, Gehanjali Amarasinghe, Christopher W P Hopkins, Calum D Moulton","doi":"10.5056/jnm24115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; <i>P</i> = 0.39; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; N<sub>studies</sub> = 3). Of individual symptoms, buspirone improved bloating severity more than placebo (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; <i>P</i> = 0.03; N<sub>studies</sub> = 2) but did not improve post-prandial fullness (<i>P</i> = 0.24, N<sub>studies</sub> = 2) or nausea (<i>P</i> = 0.75, N<sub>studies</sub> = 2). All RCTs included in the meta-analysis were good quality but most treated for only 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"31 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm24115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed.

Methods: We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale.

Results: Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; P = 0.39; I2 = 0%; Nstudies = 3). Of individual symptoms, buspirone improved bloating severity more than placebo (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; P = 0.03; Nstudies = 2) but did not improve post-prandial fullness (P = 0.24, Nstudies = 2) or nausea (P = 0.75, Nstudies = 2). All RCTs included in the meta-analysis were good quality but most treated for only 4 weeks.

Conclusions: We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁螺环酮对肠-脑相互作用的上消化道疾病的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景/目的:丁螺环酮在治疗肠脑相互作用障碍(DGBIs),特别是功能性消化不良方面显示出前景。然而,调查结果喜忧参半。方法:我们系统地检索了4个数据库(Cochrane、PubMed、Scopus和PsycInfo)中检测丁螺环酮治疗上消化道DGBI的前瞻性研究。主要终点是胃肠道症状的任何有效测量。焦虑、抑郁和不良事件是次要结局。对于随机对照试验(RCTs),我们对丁螺环酮组和对照组治疗后评分的标准化平均差异(SMD)进行了随机效应荟萃分析。采用Cochrane常见精神障碍、抑郁、焦虑和神经症组(CCDAN)量表评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。结果:10项研究(n = 283)符合纳入标准,包括5项随机对照试验、1项n -of-1试验、1项队列研究、1项病例系列研究和2份病例报告。丁螺环酮耐受性良好。在荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,丁螺环酮对功能性消化不良/胃轻瘫症状的改善不显著(SMD = -0.14;95% CI, -0.44 ~ 0.17;P = 0.39;I2 = 0%;在个体症状中,丁螺环酮比安慰剂更能改善腹胀严重程度(SMD = -0.41;95% CI, -0.77 ~ -0.04;P = 0.03;n研究= 2),但没有改善餐后饱腹感(P = 0.24, n研究= 2)或恶心(P = 0.75, n研究= 2)。meta分析中纳入的所有rct质量都很好,但大多数只治疗了4周。结论:我们发现丁螺环酮改善功能性消化不良症状的效果并不比安慰剂好,尽管研究规模较小。丁螺环酮显示出对腹胀严重程度的好处,尽管这是基于很少的研究。对丁螺环酮进行更大规模、更长期的试验,针对更明确的人群,如腹胀患者,是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
期刊最新文献
Randomized Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan According to the Timing of Dosing in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis. Incidence and Clinical Course of Post-infectious Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Patients Admitted to University Hospitals: 1-year Prospective Follow-up Study. Association Between Functional Dyspepsia and Binge Eating Disorder: A Frequent, Often Overlooked Overlap Clinical Presentation. Baseline Impedance via Manometry Predicts Pathological Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance in Isolated Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms. Delayed Gastric Emptying Correlates With Decreased Post-prandial Motility in Children: A Single-center Retrospective Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1